Eski Bir Arpa Koleksiyonundaki Fenotipik Varyasyon

Arpa, günümüzde olduğu gibi geçmişte de Türkiye’nin tarım sistemi içinde önemli bir yere sahip olmuştur. Türkiye’de arpa ıslah ve toplama çalışmaları XX. yüzyılın ilk dönemlerinde başlamıştır. O günden günümüze değin toplama çalışmaları ve materyal değişimi yoluyla tohum bankalarında ve bitki ıslahı yapan enstitülerin koleksiyonlarında çok sayıda arpa örneği birikmiştir. Bu çalışmada Eskişehir Geçit Kuşağı Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü stoklarındaki 3.500 civarında arpa örnekleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma materyali 1950 yılından günümüze kadar dünyanın 5 kıtasındaki 44 ülkeden (Asya 14, Avrupa 19, Amerika 6, Afrika 4 ve Avustralya) ve iki uluslararası tarımsal araştırma enstitüsünden temin edilmiştir. Burada sadece 2 sıralı arpaların yer aldığı 2.517 örneğe ait sonuçlar verilmiştir. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre, örnekler arasında arpa ıslah programlarına iyi bir kaynak oluşturabilecek önemli derecede çeşitlilik olduğunu belirlenmiştir.

Agro-Morphological Variation Among an Ancient World Barley Collection

Historically barley has been a very important crop in agriculture system of Turkey as it is now. Barley breeding and collecting activities started at the beginning of 20th century in Turkey. During that time huge amount of material piled up at the seed banks and collections of plant breeding institutions through collecting missions and material exchange. We characterized around 3.500 barley accessions of Eskisehir Transition Zone Agricultural Research Institute. Characterized populations have been obtained from 44 countries (Asia 14, Europe 19, Americas 6, Africa 4 and Australia) of 5 continents and two international agricultural research institutes since 1950’s up to date. We are presenting only the result of 2.517 two row barley accessions with this paper. Results of the study reveal a series of phenotypic similarities and differences between the materials of several countries. Results also show the existence of a significant amount of diversity between the populations which can be used as a source for breeding programs.

___

  • Vavilov N I (1951). The Origin, Variation, Immunity and Breeding Cultivated Plants (Translated by: K.S. Chester). Waltham, Mass. Chronica Botanica, New York
  • Toker C & Çağırgan M I (2010). Comparison of double haploid barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) lines and native cultivars in semi-arid environment. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 5(1): 1-6
  • Zhukovsky P (1951). Agricultural Structure of Turkey (Translated by: Kıpçak C, Nouruzhan H & Türkistanlı S). Türkiye Şeker Fabrikası Neşriyatı, No: 20
  • Yong-Bi F & Horbach C (2012). Genetic diversity in a core subset of wild barley germplasm. Diversity 4: 239-257
  • Yahiaoui S, Igartua E, Moralejo M, Ramsay L, MolinaCano J L, Ciudad F J, Lasa J M, Gracia M P & Casas A M (2008). Patterns of genetic and eco-geographical diversity in Spanish barleys. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116: 271-282
  • van Zeist W & de Roller G J (1995). Plant remains from Asikli Höyük, a pre-pottery site in Central Anatolia. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 4: 179-185
  • Toker C, Gorham J & Çağırgan M I (2009). Certain ion accumulations in barley mutants exposed drought and salinity. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 14(2): 162- 169
  • Thorne G N (1965). Photosynthesis of ears and flag leaves of wheat and barley. Annals of Botany 29(3): 317-329
  • Rao V R & Hodgkin T (2002). Genetic diversity and conservation of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 68: 1-9
  • Park T I, Han O K, Seo J H, Choi J S, Park K H & Kim J G (2008). New barley cultivars with improved morphological characteristics for whole crop forage in South Korea. In: Ceccarelli S & Grando S (Eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Barley Genetics Symposium, 5-10 April 2008, Alexandria, Egypt, pp. 657-665
  • Özpınar H, Soya H & Acar Z (2007). The effect of barley ratio (Hordeum vulgare L.) as a companion crop on seed yield and yield components of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) sown at different rates. 6th International Herbage Seed Conference, GjennestadNorway, 17-20 June, pp. 131-135
  • Özkan H, Kafkas S, Özer M S & Brandolini A (2005). Genetic relationships among South-East Turkey wild barley populations and sampling strategies of Hordeum spontaneum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112(1): 12-20
  • Onal-Asci Ö, Acar Z, Basaran U, Ayan İ & Mut H (2010). Barley companion crop management in red clover establishment. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(1): 45-54
  • Muhe K & Assefa A (2011). Diversity and agronomic potential of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces under variable production system in Ethiopia. International Research Journal of Plant Science 2(10): 305-310
  • Maskato Y, Talal S, Keasar T & Gefen E (2014). Red foliage color reliably indicates low host quality and increased metabolic load for development of an herbivorous insect. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 8: 285-292
  • Loskutov I G (2010). Genetic resources and main directions and results of barley and oat breeding in Russia. Agronomy Research 8(3): 673-680
  • Lasa J M, Igartua E, Ciudad F J, Codesal P, Garcia E V, Gracia M P, Medina B, Romagosa I, MolinaCano J L & Montoya J L (2001). Morphological and agronomical diversity patterns in the Spanish barley core collection. Hereditas 135: 217-225
  • Koçer A & Albayrak S (2012). Determination of forage yield and quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.) mixtures with oat and barley. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17(1): 96-99
  • Karagöz A, Zencirci N, Tan A, Taşkin T, Köksel H, Sürek M, Toker C & Özbek K (2010). Bitki genetik kaynaklarının korunması ve kullanımı. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VII. Teknik Kongresi. Bildiriler Kitabi(I): 11-15 Ocak, Ankara, s. 155-177
  • Karagöz A & Zencirci N (2005). Variation in wheat (Triticum spp.) landraces from different altitudes of three regions of Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 775-785
  • Kara B (2008). Effects of different tillage practices on the trait association in barley. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 13: 32-43
  • Kandemir N (2004). Search for high yielding, lodging resistant barley cultivars with satisfactory straw yields for a fertile production area of Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 7(6): 971-976
  • Jones G, Jones H, Charles M P, Jones M K, Colledge S, Leigh F J, Lister D A, Smith L J M, Powell W & Brown T A (2012). Phylogeographic analysis of barley DNA as evidence for the spread of Neolithic agriculture through Europe, Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 3230-3238
  • Igartua E, Gracia M P, Lasa J M, Yahiaoui S, Casao C, Molina-Cano J L, Moralejo M, Montaya J L, Ciudad F J, Kopahnke D, Ordon F, Karsai I, Szücs P & Casas A M (2008). Barley adaptation to Mediterranean conditions: Lessons learned from the Spanish landraces. Proceedings of the 10th International Barley Genetics Symposium (IBGS), 5-10 April, Alexandria, Egypt, pp. 205-214
  • ICARDA (1998). Barley Germplasm Catalog. Aleppo, Syria
  • IBPGR (1982). Barley Descriptors. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy
  • Hübner S, Torsten G, Flavell A, Fridman E, Graner A, Korol A & Schmid K J (2012). Islands and streams: Clusters and gene flow in wild barley populations from the Levant. Molecular Ecology 21: 1115-1129
  • Hawkes J G (1983). The Diversity of Crop Plants. Harward University Press, Cambridge, Massachusets
  • Harlan J R (1995). Crops and Man. American Society of Agronomy-Crop Science Society of America, pp. 284
  • Hair J F Jr, Anderson R E & Tatham R L (1987). Multivariate data analysis with readings. MacMillan Publ. Co., New York
  • Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M & Babaç M T (2012). Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyigit Botanik Bahcesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını. NAMAŞ Yayın, Istanbul
  • Gökgöl M & Taşan R (1978). Yeşilköy Zirai Araştırma Enstitüsü (Marmara-Trakya Bölge Zirai Araştırma Enstitüsü) 1926-1976. Çelikcilt Matbaası, Istanbul
  • Gökgöl M (1939). Türkiye Buğdayları, Tom: II, Yeşilköy Tohum Islah Enstitüsü Yayın No: 14, Tan Matbaası, İstanbul
  • Gould K S , Kuhn D N, Lee D W & Oberbauer S F (1995). Why leaves are sometimes red. Nature 378: 241-242
  • Ghaffaripour S, Karimzadeh R, Mohammadi M, Suq H S, Shefezadeh M K & Mohammadi N (2011). Karyotypes and evaluation of studies in some genotypes of hullless barley. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 16(2): 245-250
  • Gepts P (2004). Crop domestication as a long-term selection experiment. Plant Breeding Reviews 24: 1-44
  • Everson E H & Schaller C W (1955). The genetics of yield differences associated with awn barbing in the barley hybrid (Lion x Atlas10) x Atlas. Agronomy Journal 47: 276-280
  • Dotlacil L, Hermuth J, Stehno Z & Manev M (2000). Diversity in European winter wheat landraces and obsolete cultivars. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 16: 29-36
  • DeLacy I H, Skowmand B & Huerta J (2000). Characterization of Mexican landraces using agronomically useful attributes. Genetics Resources and Crop Evolution 47: 591-602
  • Davis P H, Mill R R & Tan K (1985). Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. V9. Edinbourgh Univ. Press, England. pp. 262-269
  • Comeau A & Jedlinski H (1987). Successful breeding for barley yellow dwarf resistance or tolerance: A systematic approach related to other agronomic characteristics. In: Burnett P A (Ed), World Perspectives on Barley Yellow Dwarf. CIMMYT, Proceedings of the International Workshop, Italy, pp. 441-451
  • Comadran J, Russell J R, Thomas W T B, van Eeuwijk F A, Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Baum M, Stanca A M, Pecchioni N, Akar T, Al-Yassin A, Benbelkacem A & Choumane W (2009). Patterns of genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in a highly structured Hordeum vulgare association-mapping population for the Mediterranean basin. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 119(1): 175-187
  • Cockram J, Jones H, Leigh F J, O’Sullivan D, Powell W, Laurie D A & Greenland A J (2007). Control of flowering time in temperate cereals: Genes, domestication, and sustainable productivity. Journal of Experimental Botany 58(6): 1231-1244
  • Chen W Y, Liu Z M, Deng G B, Pan Z F, Liang J J, Zeng X O, Tashi N M, Long H & Yu M Q (2014). Genetic relationship between lodging and lodging components in barley (Hordeum vulgare) based on unconditional and conditional quantitative trait locus analyses. Genetics and Molecular Research 13(1): 1909-1925
  • Chen Z W, Lu R J, Zou L, Du Z Z, Gao R H, He T & Huang J H (2012). Genetic diversity analysis of barley landraces and cultivars in the Shanghai region of China. Genetics and Molecular Research 11(1): 644-650
  • Chalker-Scott L (1999). Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochemistry and Photobiology 70(1): 1-9
  • Chabane J C K & Valkoun J (2004). Characterization of genetic diversity in ICARDA core collection of cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 40: 134-136
  • Ceccarelli S & Grando S (2000). Barley landraces from the Fertile Crescent: A lesson for plant breeders. In: Brush S B (Ed), Genes in the Field: On Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity, IPGRI, IDRC, Lewis Publishers, pp. 51-76
  • Bhatty R S (1999). The potential of hull-less barley. Cereal Chemistry 76: 589-599 Bhatty R S & Rossnagel B G (1997). Zero amylase lines of hull-less barley. Cereal Chemistry 74: 190-191
  • Bhatty R S (1997). Milling of regular and waxy starch hull-less barleys for the production of bran and flour. Cereal Chemistry 74: 693-699
  • Badr A & El-Shazly H (2012). Molecular approaches to origin, ancestry and domestication history of crop plants: Barley and clover as examples. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 10: 1-12
  • Backes G, Hatz B, Jahoor A & Fischbeck G (2003). RFLP diversity within and between major groups of barley in Europe. Plant Breeding 122: 291-299
  • Asfaw Z (2000). The barleys of Ethiopia. In: Brush S B (Ed), Genes in the Field: On Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity. IPGRI, IDRC, Lewis Publishers, pp. 77-108
  • Alqudah A M & Schnurbusch T (2014). Awn primordium to tipping is the most decisive developmental phase for spikelet survival in barley. Functional Plant Biology 41: 424-436
  • Akar T, Avcı M & Düşünceli F (2004). Barley: Post-harvest operations. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ inpho/docs/Post_Harvest_Compendium_BARLEY. pdf (Accessed date: 12 October, 2014)
  • Acevedo E, Craufurd P Q, Austina R B & Pérez-Marco P (1991). Traits associated with high yield in barley in low-rainfall environments. The Journal of Agricultural Science 116: 23-36
  • Abera K T (2009). Agronomic evaluation of Ethiopian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landrace populations under drought stress conditions in low-rainfall areas of Ethiopia. International Master Programme, Sweedish Biodiversity Center. No: 61, pp. 44