Comparisons of Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Eggs Obtained using Hens Reared in Deep Litter and Free-Range Systems

This study was designed to compare the physical and chemical qualities of eggs obtained using hens reared in free-rangeand deep-litter systems. A total of 300 Lohmann Brown hens (150 for each housing system) were used. In the free-rangesystem, 4 m2 grazing area was allocated for each hen. The hens were taken into layer house at 16 weeks of age. Hen eggproduction reached up to 50%, produced eggs were randomly sampled once every 4 weeks until 52 weeks of age andphysical characteristics of eggs from each housing system were measured. Results revealed that there was no significantdifference in egg shell color, egg weight, breaking strength, shell thickness, shape index, specific gravity, yolk color,albumen index, haugh unit, meat and blood spots of eggs from two housing systems. However, there was a significantdifference in yolk index. It was determined that housing systems effected the chemical content of the egg and the eggsobtained from free-range system were significantly richer in essential amino acids, vitamin D3 and biotin.

PDF

___

Altan Ö (2015). Yumurta Oluşumu, Kalitesi ve Biyoaktif Komponentleri. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, Bornova, İzmir ISBN:978-605-84400-0-5
Anderson K E (2009). Overview of natural and organic production: Looking back to the future. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 348-354
Angelovičová M, Ševčíková V, Angelovič M & Bučko O (2014). Comparison of two different breeding systems of laying hens in relation to egg shell quality. Animal Science Biotechnology 47(2): 166-171
Anonymous (2010). Minitab, version 16. Minitab Inc., State College, PA
Clerici F, Casiraghi E, Hidalgo A & Rossi M (2006). Evaluation of eggshell quality characteristics in relation to the housing system of laying hens. EPC 2006 - 12th European Poultry Conference, 10-14 September, Verona, Italy, pp. 277
Dikmen B Y, İpek A, Şahan Ü, Sözcü A & Baycan S C (2017). Impacat of different housing systems and age of layers on egg quality characteristics. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science 41: 77-84
Doley S, Barua N & Kalita N (2010). Effect of rearing systems on meat and egg qualities in indigenous fowls. Indian Veterinary Journal 87: 168-170
Galis A M, Van I & Théwis A (2012). Organoleptic, chemical and microbiological quality of table eggs obtained in different exploitation systems for laying hens in Romania. Scientific Paper, Series D, Animal Science 55: 162-166
Hanusová E, Hrnčár C, Hanus A & Oravcová M (2015). Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica 18: 20- 24
Haugh R (1937). The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg Poultry Magazine 43: 552-555
Hidalgo A, Rossi M, Clerici F & Ratti S (2008). A market study on the quality characteristics of eggs from different housing systems. Journal of Food Chemistry 106: 1031-1038
Krawczyk J & Calik J (2006). Quality of table eggs from hens of conservation breeds kept in confinement or on free range. Polish Journal of Natural Science 3: 433-438
Krawczyk J & Gornowicz E (2010). Quality of eggs from hens kept in two different free-range systems in comparison with a barn system. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 74: 151-157
Küçükyılmaz K, Bozkurt M, Herken E N, Çınar M, Çatlı A U, Bintaş E & Çöven F (2012). Effect of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two-layer hen genotype. Asian- Australian Journal of Animal Science 25(4): 559-568 Lerner I M, Taylor L W & Lowry D C (1951). Selection for increased incidence of blood spots in white leghorns. Poultry Science 30: 748-757
Lewko L & Gornowicz E (2011). Effect of housing system on egg quality in laying hens. Annal of Animal Science 11(4): 607-616
Leyendecker M, Hamann H, Hartung J, Kamphues J, Ring C, Glünder G, Ahlers C, Sander I, Neumann U & Distl O (2001). Analysis of genotype-environment interactions between layer lines and hen housing systems for performance traits, egg quality and bone breaking strength. 2nd communication: egg quality traits. Züchtungskunde 73: 308-323
Nistor L I, Albu A & Usturoi M G (2014). Knowledge of chemical indicators of eggs from hens reared in conventional and free-range system. Food Science and Technology 71: 119-124
Nistor L I, Albu A, Nistor A C & Usturoi M G (2015). Aspects of eggs quality provided from free range and conventional systems. Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology and Food Science 5: 186-189
NRC (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, Ninth Revised Edition, National Academy Pres, Washington D.C
Ozcelik M (2002). The phenotypic correlations among some external and internal quality characteristics in Japanese quail eggs. Veterinary Journal of Ankara University 49: 67-72
Pavlovski Z, Mašic B, Josipovic´ S & Hopic S (1992). The effect of the system of housing on the laying performance of hens in small flocks. Biotechnologija u Stočarstvu 8: 57-63
Pavlovski Z, Hopic´ S & Lukic M (2001). Housing systems for layers and egg quality. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 17: 197-201
Pavlovski Z, S̆ krbic Z & Lukic M (2004). Influence of housing type on internal and external quality of eggs in small flocks of hens. Živinarstvo 39: 9-23
Radu-Rusu R M, Usturoi M G, Leahu A, Amariei S, Radu-Rusu C G & Vacaru-Opriş I (2014). Chemical features, cholesterol and energy content of table hen eggs from conventional and alternative farming systems. South African Journal of Animal Science 44: 3-42
Samiullah S, Roberts J R & Chousalkar K K (2014). Effect of production system and flock age on egg quality and total bacterial load in commercial laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 23: 59-70
Sekeroglu A, Sari̇ca M, Demi̇r E, Ulutas Z, Ti̇lki̇ M, Saatci̇ M & Omed H (2010). Effects of different housing systems on some performance traits and egg qualities of laying hens. Journal of Veterinary Advances 9: 1739-1744
Senčic Đ & Butko D (2006). Productivity of layers and egg quality in free range and cage system of housing. Poljoprivreda 12: 48-51
Senčic Đ, Antunovic Z, Domac´inovic M, Šperanda M & Steiner Z (2006). Egg quality from free range and cage system of keeping layers. Stočarstvo 60: 173- 179
Torges G & Matthes S (1975). Investigations on the effect of type of management of laying hens (free-range, on the floor or in cages) on egg quality characters. Kleintierzucht in Forschung und Lehre Celler Jahrbuch 23: 18
Torges H G, Matthes S & Harnisch S (1976). Comparative studies on eggs from commercial poultry farms with free-range, deep litter or cage management. Archiv fur Lebensmittel-hygiene 27: 107-112
Wegner R M (1982). Investigation of production systems for laying hens with regard to ethological aspects. Landbauforsch Volkunde 32: 162-166
Yang H M, Yang Z, Wang W, Wang Z Y, Sun H N, Ju X J & Qi X M (2014). Effects of different housing systems on visceral organs, serum biochemical proportions, immune performance and egg quality of laying hens. European Poultry Science 78: DOI:10.1399/ eps.2014.48