The Impact of Soil Conditioners on Some Chemical Properties of Soil and Grain Yield of Corn (Zea Mays L.)

The Impact of Soil Conditioners on Some Chemical Properties of Soil and Grain Yield of Corn (Zea Mays L.)

The goal of this study was to explore the effects of various soil conditioners on selected properties (pH; organic matter,OM; electrical conductivity, EC; cation exchange capacity, CEC) of a Xerofluvent soil and corn yield. During theexperiment, four amendments were applied in an experimental set of plots: tobacco waste compost (TWC), poultrymanure (PM), bio-humus (BH), and chemical fertilizer (NPK). Soils were treated with TWC at the rate 50 t ha-1, PMat the rate 4 t ha-1, BH at the rate 10 t ha-1 and NPK at the rate 300 kg ha-1, respectively. All organic conditioners wereincreased soil pH, OM, CEC, EC and corn yield when compared with the control soil and these parameters have beenchanged from 5.7% to 333%. The most effective soil conditioners were determined as tobacco waste compost, biohumus,and poultry manure. The findings of current study suggest that 50 t ha-1 TWC should be added to soil as a priorityfor improving properties of a Typic Xerofluvent soil and crop yield.

___

  • Ayoola O T & Makinde E A (2009). Maize growth, yield and soil nutrient changes with N enriched. organic fertilizers. African Journal of Food Agricultural and Nutritional Development 9(1): 580-592
  • Barral M T, Paradelo R, Moldes A B, Dominguez M & Diaz-Fierros F (2009). Utilization of MSW compost for organic matter conservation in agricultural soils of NW Spain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53(9): 529-534
  • Batlle-Bayer L, Batjes N H & Bindraban P S (2010). Changes in organic carbon stocks upon land use conversion in the Brazilian Cerrado: A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 137: 47-58
  • Bouyoucos G J (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal 54(5): 464-465
  • Candemir F & Gulser C (2011). Effects of different agricultural wastes on some soil quality indexes in clay and loamy sand fields. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42(1): 13-28
  • Cercioglu M (2017). The role of organic soil amendments on soil physical properties and yield of maize (Zea Mays L.). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 48(6): 683-691
  • Cercioglu M, Okur B, Delibacak S & Ongun A R (2012). Effects of tobacco waste and farmyard manure on soil properties and yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43(6): 875-886
  • Danielson R E & Sutherland P L (1986). Porosity. In: A. Klute (Ed), Methods of Soil Analysis Part I: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, ASA-SSA 2nd Ed., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 443-461
  • Di Serio M G, Lanza B, Mucciarella M R, Russi F, Iannucci E, Marfisi P & Madeo A (2008). Effects of olive mill wastewater spreading on the physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of soil. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 62(4): 403-407
  • Garg S & Bahla G S (2008). Phosphorus availability to maize as influenced by organic manures and fertilizer P associated phosphatase activity in soils. Bioresource Technology 99(13): 5773-5777
  • Giannakis G V, Kourgialas N N, Paranychianakis N V, Nikolaidis N P & Kalogerakis N (2014). Effects of municipal solid waste compost on soil properties and vegetables growth. Compost Science & Utilization 22(3): 116-131
  • Heal O W, Anderson J M & Swift J M (1997). Plant litter quality and decomposition: a historical overview. In: G Cadisch & K E Giller (Eds.), Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 3-30
  • Hepperly Y P, Lotter D, Ulsh C Z, Siedel R & Reider C (2009). Compost, manure and synthetic fertilizer influences crop yields, soil properties, nitrate leaching and crop nutrient content. Compost Science & Utilization 17(2): 117-126
  • Herencia J F, Garcia-Galavis P A & Maqueda C (2011). Long-term effect of organic and mineral fertilization on soil physical properties under greenhouse and outdoor management practices. Pedosphere 21(4): 443-453
  • Jackson M L (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice- Hall of India, Private Limited, New Delhi, India Jakubus M & Czekala J (2002). The utilization of tobacco dust as a source of nitrogen for plants and of carbon for the formation of humus compounds in the soil. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the RAMIRAN Network, 14-18 May, Hlinkova– Kos˘ice, Slovak Republic: University of Veterinary Medicine, Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, pp. 195-196
  • Jien S H & Wang C S (2013). Effects of biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a highly weathered soil. Catena 110: 225-233
  • Kacar B (1995). Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri III: Toprak Analizleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Eğitim Araştırma ve Gelişme Vakfı Yayınları, No: 3, 705 s
  • Kayıkçıoğlu H H & Okur N (2011). Evolution of enzyme activities during composting of tobacco waste. Waste Management and Research 29(11): 1124-1133
  • Lal R (2007). Anthropogenic influences on world soils and implications to global food security. Advances in Agronomy 93: 69-93
  • Li L J & Han X Z (2016). Changes of soil properties and carbon fractions after long-term application of organic amendments in Mollisols. Catena 143: 140-144
  • Lindsay W L & Norvell W A (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42(3): 421- 428
  • Mabuhay J A, Nakagoshi N & Isagi Y (2006). Microbial responses to organic and inorganic amendments in eroded soil. Land Degradation and Development 17(3): 321-332
  • Mechri B, Echbili A, Issaoui M, Braham M, Elhadj S B & Hammami M (2007). Short-term effects in soil microbial community following agronomic application of olive mill wastewaters in a field of olive trees. Applied Soil Ecology 36(2-3): 216-223
  • Morugan-Coronado A, Garcia-Orenes F, Mataix-Solera J, Arcenegui V & Mataix-Beneyto J (2011). Shortterm effects of treated wastewater irrigation on Mediterranean calcareous soil. Soil & Tillage Research 112(1): 18-26
  • Nastri A, Triberti L, Giordani G, Comellini F & Baldoni G (2009). Direct and residual effects of manure on soil chemical properties. Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 11, EUG2009-4488-1
  • Nelson D W & Sommers L E (1982). Organic matter. In: Methods of Soil Analysis Part II: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd Edition, Agronomy, No: 9, pp. 574-579
  • Obire O & Akinde S B (2006). Comparative study of the efficiency of cow dung and poultry manure as nutrient sources in bioremediation of oil polluted soil. Niger Delta Biologia 5(2): 82-91
  • Odedina J N, Odedina S A & Ojeniyi S O (2011). Effect of types of manure on growth and yield of cassav
  • Odlare M, Arthurson V, Pell M, Svensson K, Nehrenheim E & Abubaker J (2011). Land application of organic waste: Effects on the soil ecosystem. Applied Energy 88(6): 2210-2218
  • Ojeniyi S O (2000). Effect of goat manure on soil nutrients content and okra yield in rainforest area of Nigeria. Applied Tropical Agricultural Journal 5: 20-23
  • Ojeniyi S O & Adeniyan N O (1999). Effect of poultry manure and NPK fertilizer on soil fertility nutrients content and yield of maize at Akure. Southwest Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of Soil Science Society of Nigeria, 21-25 November, Benin City, Nigeria, pp. 185-191
  • Okur N, Kayikcioglu H H, Okur B & Delibacak S (2008). Organic amendment based on tobacco waste compost and farmyard manure: Influence of soil biological properties and butter-head lettuce yield. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 32: 91-99
  • Olsen S R & Sommers E L (1982). Phosphorous availability indices, phosporus soluble in sodium bicarbonate. In: A L Page, P H Miller & D R Keeney (Eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edition, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 404-430
  • Ozores-Hampton M, Stansly P A & Salame T P (2011). Soil chemical, physical, and biological properties of a sandy soil subjected to long-term organic amendments. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35(3): 243-259
  • Peverill K I, Sparrow L A & Reuter D J (1999). Soil Analysis: An Interpretation Manual. CSIRO Publishing, Melborne
  • Piotrowska-Cyplik A, Olejnik A, Cyplik P, Dach J & Czarnecki Z (2009). The kinetics of nicotine degradation, enzyme activities and genotoxic potential in the characterization of tobacco waste composting. Bioresource Technology 100: 5037-5044
  • Qian P, Schoenau J J & Mooleki P (2004). Phosphorus amount and distribution in a Saskatchewan soil after five years of swine and cattle manure application. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 84(3): 275-281
  • Rhoades J D (1982a). Cation exchange capacity. In: Methods of Soil Analysis Part II: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd Edition, Agronomy, No: 9, pp. 149-157
  • Rhoades J D (1996). Salinity: Electrical conductivity and dissolved soilds. In: Methods of Soil Analysis Part III: Chemical Methods, 2nd Edition, Agronomy, No: 15, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 417-436
  • Saha S, Mina B L, Gopinath K A, Kundu S & Gupta H S (2008). Organic amendments affect biochemical properties of a subtemperate soil of the Indian Himalayas. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 80(3): 233-242
  • Schoebitz M & Vidal G (2016). Microbial consortium and pig slurry to improve chemical properties of degraded soil and nutrient plant uptake. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 16(1): 226-236
  • Soil Survey Staff (2006). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 10th Edition, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C
  • TUIK (2017). Turkish Statistical Institute data basisagriculture. http://www.tuik.gov.tr (Date of access: 25.12.2017)
  • Tüzüner A (1990). Toprak ve Su Analiz Laboratuvarları El Kitabı. Tarım Orman ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Yayın No: 279, Ankara
  • Wang P, Changa C M, Watson M E, Dick W A, Chen Y & Hoitink H A J (2004). Maturity indices for composted dairy and pig manures. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36: 767-776
  • Warren J G, Phillips S B, Mullins G L, Keahey D & Penn C J (2006). Environmental and production consequences of using alum-amended poultry litter as a nutrient source for corn. Journal of Environmental Quality 35: 172-183
Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Halit APAYDIN