Bodur kiraz bahçelerinde damla ve mikro yağmurlama sulama yöntemlerinin yatırım ve işletme masrafları yönünden karşılaştırılması

Comparison of drip and micro sprinkler irrigation methods for dwarf cherry orchards in the aspect of investment and operational costs

Abstract: This study was conducted in the field of Tekirdag Viticulture Research Institute. Drip and micro sprinkler irrigation methods were compared in respect to irrigation water requirements, establishment cost, running cost, energy cost and annual total cost in the cherry orchard of 27.3 da. For this purpose, soil characteristics were determined, irrigation water requirements of cherry was calculated, and then, irrigation systems were planned, system capacities were determined, system components were designed and project estimated costs were prepared according to prices of year of 2006. The cost of establishment, capital, fixed, energy, maintenance, labour of irrigation and annual total costs were calculated by economic analysis. As a result, seasonal irrigation water requirements were found 397 mm and 482 mm for drip and micro sprinkler irrigation methods, respectively. System capacities were determined as 3.56 L/s in drip irrigation method and 5.12 L/s in micro sprinkler irrigation method. Annual total capital cost and annual total cost were found as upper at the level of 17% and 13%, respectively, in drip irrigation method than micro sprinkler irrigation method. According to the this results, it has been suggested that, when irrigation water has been taken from the wells with low dynamic head, if water source has been adequate micro sprinkler irrigation method can be applied, but if water is scarce drip irrigation method should be preferred.

___

  • Anonim 2006. 2006 Yıl ıİnşaat İşleri Birim Fiyat Cetveli. Köy Hiz. Gen. Müd. Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Ayyıldız, M. 1990. Sulama Suyu Kalitesi ve Tuzluluk Problemleri. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayınları 1196, Ankara.
  • Baddeley, J.A. and C.A Watson. 2004. Influences of root diameter, tree age, soil depth and season on fine root survivorship in Prunus avium. Plant and Soil Sci. 276, 15-22.
  • Balaban, A. 1986. Su Kaynaklarının Planlanması. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayınları 972, 263s, Ankara.
  • Benami, A. and M.H. Diskin. 1965. Design of Sprinkling Irrigation, Lowdermilk Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Publication 23, Technicon, Israel Institute of Tecnology, 1 -165, Haifa, Israel.
  • Blake, G.R. 1965. Bulk density methods of soil analysis. Part I., Am. Soc. Agron. 9, 374 - 390, Soil Science Society of America, Madison.
  • Burt, C.M., A.J. Clemmens, R. Bliesner, J.L. Merriam and L. Hardy. 2000. Selection of Irrigation Methods for Agriculture. American Society of Civil Engineers.
  • Criddle, W.D., S. Davis, C.H. Pair and D.G. Shockley. 1956. Methods for Evaluation of Irrigation Systems. USDA Agric. Handbook, 82 pp., Washington D.C.
  • Çetin, B., T. Tipi, H. Özer and S. Yazgan. 2003. Economics of drip irrigation for peach (Prunus Persica) orchards in Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horti. Sci. 31, 85-90.
  • Çetin, B., S. Yazgan, and T. Tipi. 2004. Economics of drip irrigation of olives in Turkey. Agric. Wat. Manage 66: 145-151.
  • Doorenbos, J. and W.O. Pruit. 1984. Guidelines for Predicting Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrig. and Drain. Paper 24, Rome.
  • Güngör, Y. ve O. Yıldırım. 1989. Tarla Sulama Sistemleri. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayınlar ı155, 371 s, Ankara.
  • Güngör, Y., Z. Erözel ve O. Yıldırım. 1996. Sulama. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayınları, Ders Kitabı No: 1443/424, Ankara.
  • Kanber, R. 1997. Sulama. Çukurova Üniv. Zir. Fak. Ders Kitabı, Genel Yayın No: 174, Ders Kitapları Yayın No: 52, 530s, Adana.
  • Kay, M. and, N. Hatcho. 1992. Small - Scale Pumped Irrigation: Energy and Cost Irrigation Water Management Training Manuel, (Provisional Edition), FAO, Rome.
  • Kaya, L. ve O. Yıldırım. 1999. Meyve bahçelerinde mikro sulama sistem maliyetlerinin karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 5(1): 59-65, Ankara.
  • Korukçu, A. ve H. Büyükcangaz 2003. Su ve sulama yönetimine bütünsel yaklaşım. 2. Ulusal Sulama Kongresi, Bildiriler Kitabı, s:19 - 32, Aydın.
  • Nunez-Elisea, R. 2004. Tree water use, irrigation scheduling and water management systems in sweet cherry. Research Report, Mid-Columbia Agricultural Research and Extension Center Oregon State University Sweet Cherry Research Program.
  • Orta, A.H. 1997. Bağ Sulamasında Damla ve Karık Yöntemlerinin Ekonomik Yönden Karşılaştırılması. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araş. Gen. Müd. Bağcılık Araş. Enst. Müd. Yayınları 151, Tekirdağ.
  • Papazafiriou, Z.G. 1980. A Compact Procedure for Trickle Irrigation System Design. ICID Bulletin 19(1): 28 - 45.
  • Romero, P., J. Garcia and, P. Botia. 2006. Cost - benefit analysis of a regulated deficit - irrigated almond orchard under subsurface drip irrigation conditions in Southeastern Spain. Irrig. Sci. 24: 175-184.
  • Smith, M. 1992. CROPWAT a Computer Program for Irrigation Planning and Management. FAO Irrig. and Drain. Paper 46, 126 pp., Rome.
  • Thadchayini, T. and S. Thiruchelvam. 2005. An Economic Evaluation of a Drip Irrigation Project for Banana Cultivation in Jaffna District. Water Professionals' Day Symposium, Sri Lanka.
  • Yıldırım, O. 1994. Meyve Ağaçlarının Sulanmasında Damla, Yağmurlama ve Karık Yöntemlerinin Ekonomik Yönden Karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayınları 1347, 47s, Ankara.
  • Yıldırım, O. 2005. Sulama Sistemlerinin Tasarımı. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayınları 1542, Ders Kitabı No: 495, Ankara.
  • http://www.icid.org