Ultrason & Radyofrekans ve Kavitasyonel Ultraporasyon Yöntemlerinin Bölgesel İncelme ve Vücut Kompozisyonuna Etkisi

Amaç: Bu çalışma, abdominal adipoziteyi azaltmak isteği ile Ultrason & Radyofrekans ve Kavitasyonel Ultraporasyon yöntemlerine başvuran bireylerde, bu yöntemlerin adipozite ve vücut kompozisyonuna etkisini değerlendirmek amacı ile yürütülmüştür.Materyal-Metod: Araştırmaya abdominal adipoziteyi azaltmak isteyen toplam 87 birey katılmıştır. Hekim kararı Ultrason&Radyofrekans yöntemi (RF) (Exilis-2011, BTL Medikal Cihazlar), %70'ine Kavitasyonel yöntem (KWT) (Ultrasound Kavitasyon Eximia -2010, 1065 DJ Cosmo Plus) uygulanmıştır. Katılımcıların, biyoelektrik impedans analizi ile (BIA) (Tanita BC-418) vücut kompozisyonları iki kez ölçülmüştür. İlk ve son ölçümler arasında, uygulanan yöntem, seans sayısı ve diyet yapma durumuna göre bir farklılık olup olmadığı değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Vücut kompozisyon parametrelerinden sadece kalça çevresinde, uygulanan yönteme göre ilk ve son ölçümlerindeki farklılığın anlamlı olduğu bulunmuştur (F= 4.728, p=0.03). KWT yöntemi uygulananlarda, kalça çevresindeki azalma RF yöntemi uygulananlardan daha fazla olmuştur. Seans sayısına göre, sadece bel çevresinde (F=3769, p=0.028) ve Beden Kütle İndeksinde (BKİ) anlamlı bir farklılık (F=3660, p=0.030) saptanmıştır. On bir seans ve üzerinde uygulama yapılanlarda (yöntem farklılığı önemli olmaksızın) bel çevresindeki incelmenin daha fazla olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bireylerin zayıflama diyeti uygulama durumlarına göre, kalça çevresi dışında tüm vücut kompozisyon parametrelerinde anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur (p

The Effect of Ultrasound & Radiofrequency and Cavitational Ultraporation Methods Upon Local Slimming and Body Composition

Objective: This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of Ultrasound & Radiofrequency and Cavitational Ultraporation methods upon adiposity and body composition in individuals applied to these methods through the desire of decreasing abdominal adiposity. Material-Method: Totally 87 individuals aiming to reduce abdominal adiposity participated into the research. In accordance with the physician's decision, 30% of the participants were administered with Ultrasound& Radiofrequency method (RF) (Exilis-2011, BTL Medical Devices) and 70% of the participants were administered with the Cavitational method (KWT) (Ultrasound Cavitation Eximia -2010, 1065 DJ Cosmo Plus). Body compositions of the participants were measured twice with bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) (Tanita BC-418). Whether there was a difference between the first and last measurements according to the number of sessions and dietary status was evaluated. Results: It was found that the difference between the first and last measurements according to the applied method was significant only in hip circumference among the body composition parameters (F; 4.728, p=0.03). The decrease in hip circumference was more in individuals administered with KWT method rather than the ones administered with RF method. According to the number of sessions, a significant difference was only determined in waist circumference (F;3769, p; 0.028) and Body Mass Index (BMI) (F;3660, p;0.030). In individuals administered with eleven and over sessions (regardless of the method difference), thinning in waist circumference was determined to be more. According to the dietary status of the individuals, significant differences were found in whole body composition parameters apart from the hip circumference (p<0.05).Conclusion: Although no significant difference was found in abdominal fat and total body fat composition depending upon the administered method difference, decrease at waist circumference and BMI values was determined depending upon the number of sessions in both methods. Although no significant difference was found in abdominal fat and total total body, left leg, and body adipose tissue were determined to be more in participants administered with weight-reducing diet.

PDF

___

1. Pekcan G. Şişmanlık Belirleyicileri: Bugün ve Gelecek için Olası Senaryolar. Baysal A, Baş M, ed. Yetişkinlerde Ağırlık Yönetimi. 1. Baskı. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyetisyenler Derneği Yayını- Ekspres Baskı; 2008: s.1-10.
2. Özmen S, Demir HY, Yavuzer R, Latifoğlu O. Alternative Aesthetic Applications II - Carboxytherapy and Oxytherapy. Türk Plast Rekonstr Est Cer Derg 2006;14(1):29-34.
3. Proebstle TM. Cellulite. Hautarzt 2010;61(10):864-872.
4. Weiss RA. Noninvasive radiofrequency for skin tightening and body contouring. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2013;32(1):9- 17.
5. Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, Brown DB, Ksenzenko S, Burns J, Kilmer S, Mehregan D, Pope K. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequencybased nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol 2004;140(2):204-209.
6. Franco W, Kothare A, Ronan SJ, Grekin RC, Mc Calmont TH. Hyperthermic injury to adipocyte cells by selective heating of subcutaneous fat with a novel radiofrequency device: feasibility studies. Lasers Surg Med 2010;42(5):361- 370.
7. Lolis MS, Goldberg DJ. Radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology: a review. Dermatol Surg 2012;38(11):1765- 1776.
8. Emilia del Pino M, Rosado RH, Azuela A, Graciela Guzman M, Argülelles D, Rodriquez C, Rosado GM. Effect of controlled volumetric tissue heating with radiofrequency on cellulite and the subcutaneous tissue of the buttocks and thighs. J Drugs Dermatol 2006;5(8):714-722.
9. Kist D, Burns AJ, Sanner R, Counters J, Zelickson B. Ultrastructural evaluation of multiple pass low energy versus single pass high energy radio-frequency treatment. Lasers Surg Med 2006;38(2):150-154.
10. Moreno-Moraga J, Valero-Altes T, Riquelme AM, Isarria-Marcosy MI, de la Torre JR. Body contouring by noninvasive transdermal focused ultrasound. Lasers Surg Med 2007;39(4):315-323.
11. Saedi N, Kaminer M. New waves for fat reduction:high intensity focused ultrasound. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2013;32(1):26-30.
12. Van der Lugt C, Romero C, Ancona D, Al-Zarouni M, Perera J, Trelles MA. A multicenter study of cellulite treatment with a variable emission radio frequency system. Dermatol Ther 2009;22(1):74-84.
13. Kielczewska M, Szymczyk J, Leszczynsk R, Blaszczyk J. The effect of high-frequency current and ultrasonic wave on selected indicators of body weight. Pol Merkur Lekarski 2015;38(225):150-154.
14. Adatto MA, Adatto-Neilson RM, Morren G.Reduction in adipose tissue volume using a new high-power radiofrequency technology combined with infrared light and mechanical manipulation for body contouring. Lasers Med Sci 2014;29(5):1627-1631.
15. Romero C, Caballero N, Herrero M, Ruíz R, Sadick NS, Trelles MA. Effects of cellulite treatment with RF, IR light, mechanical massage and suction treating one buttock with the contralateral as a control. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2008;10(4):193-201.
16. Insel P, Turner RE, Ross D. Nutrition, 2nd ed. Canada: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2004.
17. Ceccarelli M. Ultrasonic Hydrolipoclasis (External Ultrasound). Goldman MP, Bacci PA, Leibaschoff G, Hexell D, Angelini F, ed. Cellulite Pathophysiology and Treatment. NY: USA. Taylor & Francis Group; 2006:242-246.
18. Shek SY, Yeung CK, Chan JC, Chan HH. Efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasonography for noninvasive body sculpting in Chinese patients. Lasers Surg Med 2014;46(4):263-269.
19. Fatemi A.High-intensity focused ultrasound effectively reduces adipose tissue. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2009;28(4):257-262.
20. Anolik R, Chapas AM, Brightman LA, Geronemus RG. Radiofrequency devices for body shaping: a reviewand study of 12 patients. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2009;28(4):236-243.
21. Gadsden E, Aguilar MT, Smoller BR, Jewell ML.Evaluation of a novel high-intensity focused ultrasound device for ablating subcutaneous adipose tissue for noninvasive body contouring: safety studies in human volunteers. Aesthet Surg J 2011;31(4):401-410.
22. Solish N, Lin X, Axford-Gatley RA, Strangman NM, Kane M. A randomized, single blind, post marketing study of multiple energy levels of high intensity focused ultrasound fornoninvasive body sculpting. Dermatol Surg 2012;38(1):58- 67.
23. Jewell ML, Baxter RA, Cox SE, Donofrio LM, Dover JS, Glogau RG, et al. Randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device for noninvasive body sculpting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128(1):253-262.
24. Jewell ML, Solish NJ, Desilets CS.Noninvasive body sculpting technologies with an emphasis on high-intensity focused ultrasound. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011;35(5):901-912.