Su ürünlerinde tazelik ve kalite belirlemede klasik yöntemler

Kaliteli ürünlerin kaliteli kaynaktan ve en yüksek düzeyde sağlık koşullarına uyarak üretilmesi gerekir. Su ürünleri kolay bozulur gıdalar grubunda yer alır. Gıda endüstrisinin mamul madde üretiminde hammadde olarak su ürünleri de kullanılmaktadır. Tüketici sağlığının korunması için, üretim işlem basamaklarına geçilmeden uygun yöntemlerle hammaddenin kalite ve tazeliğinin kontrol ve denetimi gerekir. Bu kontrol ve denetim uluslar arası ticaret için de önemlidir. Bu çalışmada su ürünlerinin tazelik ve kalite denetimlerinde geçmişten bugüne kullanılmakta olan fiziksel, kimyasal, mikrobiyolojik ve duyusal yöntemler incelenmiştir.

Clasical methods on the seafood freshness and quality determination

Quality products must be made by complying with the quality products and the highest level of quality resources for health conditions. Seafood is located in perishable food group. Seafood is also used in production of manufactured goods of the food industry as a raw material. For the protection of consumer health, the control of the quality and freshness of raw materials must be provided with appropriate methods before the production process steps. This control process is important to international trade, also. In this study, the physical, chemical, microbiological and sensory methods, being used in fressness and quality control of seafood from the past to present have been investigated.

___

  • Agemura, T., Joy, D. C., 2002. Fish-Eye Optics for the Scanning Electron Microscope. Microsc. Microanal, 8 (02): 716-717
  • Alasalvar, C., Taylor, K. D. A., Öksüz, A., Gartwaite, T., Alexis, M. N., Grigorakis, K., 2001. Freshness Assessment of Cultured Sea Bream (Sparus auratus) by Chemical, Physical and Sensory Methods. Food Chemistry, 72: 33-40. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00196-5
  • Altuğ, T., Elmacı, Y., 2005. Gıdalarda Duyusal Değerlendirme. Meta Basım Matbacılık Hizmetleri, İzmir. 130 s.
  • Barbosa, A., Vaz-Pires, P. 2004. Quality Index Method (QIM): Development of a Sensorial Scheme for Commmon Octopus Optopus vulgaris). Food Control, 15: 161-168. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00027-6
  • Benedito, J., Carcel, J. A., Rossello, C., Mulet, A., 2001. Composition Assessment of Raw Meat Mixtures Using Ultrasonics. Meat Science, 57(4): 365-370. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00113-3
  • Berkel, B. M., Boogaard, B., Heijnen, C., 2004. Preservation of Fish and Meat Agrodok 12. Agromisa Foundation, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 86 p.
  • Careche, M., Barroso, M., 2009. Instrumental Texture Measurement. In: Quality of Fish From Catch to Consumer, Luten, J. B., Oehlenschlager, J., Olafsdotttir (Eds.), Wageningen Academic Publishers, Netherlands. pp. 214-239.
  • Coppes, Z., Pavlisko, A., Vecchi, S. 2002. Texture Measurements in Fish and Fish Products. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 11 (1): 89- 105. doi: 10.1300/J030v11n01_08
  • Çaklı, Ş. 2007. Su Ürünleri İşleme Teknolojisi. Cilt 1. Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları. No:76. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, Bornova, İzmir. 696 s. Gülyavuz, H., Ünlüsayın, M., 1999. Su Ürünleri İşleme Teknolojisi, Süleyman
  • Demirel Üniversitesi Eğirdir Su Ürünleri Fak. Ders Kitabı, Şahin Matbaası, Ankara. 366 s.
  • Huss, H. H., 1995. Quality and Quality Changes in Fresh Fish. Fao Fisheries Technical Paper- 348, Rome. 172 p.
  • Johnston, W. A., Nicholson, F. J., Roger, A., Stroud, G. D., 1994. Freezing and Refrigerated Storage in Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No 340, Rome, FAO. 143 p.
  • Jorgensen, B. M., Oehlenschlager, J., Olafsdottir, G., Tryggvadottir, S. V., Careche, M., Heia, K., Nesvadba, P., Nunes, M. L., Poli, B. M., Di Natale, C., Perez-Villareal, B., Ballo, H., Luten, J., Smelt, A, Denton, W., Bossier, P., Hattula, T., Akesson, G., 2003. A study of the attitudes of the European fish sector towards quality monitoring and labelling. In: Quality of Fish From Catch to Consumer, Luten, J. B., Oehlenschlager, J., Olafsdotttir (Eds.), Wageningen Academic Publishers, Netherlands. pp. 57-74.
  • Larmond, E., 1977. Laboratory Methods for Seonsory Evaluation of Food. Research Branch. Canadian Government Publishing Centre. Ottawa, Canada. 74 p.
  • Lawless, H. T., Hildegarde, H., 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food Principles and Practices. Springer, NY, USA. 596 p. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5
  • Martinsdottir, E., Luten, J. B., Schelvis-Smit, A. A. M., Hyldig, G., 2003. Developments of QIM- Past and Future. In: Quality of Fish From Catch to Consumer, Luten, J. B., Oehlenschlager, J., Olafsdotttir (Eds.), Wageningen Academic Publishers, Netherlands. pp. 265-272.
  • Martinsdottir, E., Schelvis, R., Hyldig, G., Sveinsdottir, K., 2009a. Sensory evaluation of seafood: general principles and guidelines. In: Fishery Products Quality, Safety and Authenticity, Rehbein, H., Oehlenschlager, J. (Eds). Wiley-Blackwell, USA. pp. 411- 424. doi: 10.1002/9781444322668.ch19
  • Martinsdottir, E., Schelvis, R., Hyldig, G., Sveinsdottir, K. 2009b. Sensory evaluation of seafood: general principles and guidelines. In: Fishery Products Quality, Safety and Authenticity, Rehbein, H., Oehlenschlager, J. (Eds). Wıley-Blackwell, USA. pp. 425 - 443. doi: 10.1002/9781444322668.ch19
  • Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. V., Carr, B. T., 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Bocan Raton, FA, USA. 364 p.
  • Morzel, M., Sheehan, E. M., Delahunty, C. M., Aredt, E. K., 1999. Sensory Evaluation of Lightly Preserved Salmon Using Free-Choise Profilling. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 34: 115-123. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2621.1999.00239.x
  • Murray, J., Burt, J. R., 2001. The Composition of Fish. Ministry of Technology. Torry Research Station. Torry Advisory Note: 38 http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/tan/x5916e/x5916e00.htm#Accompanying% 20Notes Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2014.
  • Nesheim, N. M., Yaktine, A. L., 2007. Seafood Choices Balancing Benefits and Risks. The National Academies Pres, Washington, USA. 722 p.
  • Nicholas, T. A., 1992. Antimicrobial Use of Native and Enzymatically Degraded Chitosans for Seafood Aplications. The University of Maine, The Graduate School, Master Thesis, Maine. 130 p.
  • Olafsdottir, G., Martinsdottir, E., Oehlenschlager, J., Dalgaard, P., Jensen, B., Undeland, I., Mackie, İ. M., Henehan, G., Nielsen, J., Nilsen, H., 1997. Methods to Evaluate Fish Freshness in Research and Industry. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 28: 258-265. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01049-2
  • Omurtag, A. C., 1961. Balıkların Tazeliğini Tayin İçin Bildirilen Mekanik Bir Metod Üzerinde Araştırma. 1961. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 8 (4) http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/11/640/8196.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2014.
  • Serdaroğlu, M., Deniz, E. E., 2001. Balıklarda ve Bazı Su Ürünlerinde Trimetilamin (TMA) ve Dimetilamin (DMA) Oluşumunu Etkileyen Koşullar. Ege J Fish Aqua Sci, 18 (3-4): 575-581.
  • Serdaroğlu, M., Purma, Ç., 2006. Su Ürünlerinde Kalitenin Saptanmasında Kullanılan Hızlı Teknikler. Ege J Fish Aqua Sci 23 (1/3): 495-496.
  • Sveinsdottir, S., Hyldig, G., Martinsdottir, E. Jorgensen, B., Kristbergsson, K., 2003. Quality Index Method (QIM) Scheme Developed For Farmed Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Food Quality and Preference, 14: 237- 245. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00081-2
  • Triqui, R., 2006. Sensory and Flavor Profiles As A Means of Assessing Freshness of Hake (Merluccius merluccius) During Ice Storage. Eur Food Res Technol, 222: 41-47. doi: 10.1007/s00217-005-0078-y
  • Vaclavik, V. A., Christian, E. W., 2008. Essentials of Food Science. Springer, New York, USA. 571 p.
  • Varlık, C., Özden, Ö., Erkan, N., Alakavuk, D. Ü., 2007. Su Ürünlerinde Temel Kalite Kontrol. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayın No. 4662. Fakülte Yayın No:8, İstanbul Üniversitesi Basım ve Yayınevi Müdürlüğü, İstanbul. 202 s.
  • Verrez-Bagnis, V., Ladrat, C., Morzel, M., Noel, J., Fleurence, J., 2001. Protein Changes in Post Mortem Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Muscle Monitored by One-and Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 22: 1539-1544. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(200105)22:8_____1539::AID-ELPS1539>3.0.CO;2-K
  • Volpe, G., Mascini, M., 1996. Enzyme Sensors for Determination of Fish Freshness. Talanta, 43 (1996): 283-289. doi: 10.1016/0039-9140(95)01758-5
  • Yapar, A., Yetim, H., 1998. Determination of anchovy freshness by refractive index of eye fluid. Food Research International, 31(10): 693-695. doi: 10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00047-2