0,05). Statik denge değerlerine bakıldığında; deney ve kontrol gruplarının ortalama basınç merkezi x, ortalama basınç merkezi y, ortalama ileri-geri hız, ortalama sağa-sola hız, kullanılan çevre değerleri için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Deney grubu için sağa-sola salınım sapması ve kullanılan alan değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,01). Kontrol grubu için sağa-sola salınım sapması ve kullanılan alan değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir (p>0,05). Deney ve kontrol gruplarının öne-arkaya salınım sapması değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,01), (p<0,05). Proprioseptif duyu bulguları incelendiğinde; deney ve kontrol gruplarının stabilite göstergesi, ortalama kuvvet varyansı, ortalama takip hatası değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir (p>0,05). Araştırmanın sonucunda; dinamik ısınmanın, esnekliğe olumlu yönde etki ettiği, statik dengeye az düzeyde olumlu etki ettiği ve Proprioseptif duyuya etki etmediği tespit edilmiştir. This research was aimed to determine the acute effects of dynamic warm up on static balance and proprioceptive sense in young soccer players. 41 young licenced soccer player training regularly and did not have any surgical operations in the last one year (with an average age of 16.46 ± 0.66 for the experimental group, and 16,50 ± 0,70 for the control group) participated in this research. 41 soccer players were randomly divided into two groups as the experimental group (n:23) and the control group (n:18). The Pro-Kin, Technobody equipment was used for the participants' balance and proprioceptive sense measurements. After performing the initial measurements, the experimental group participated in the warm-up exercise. Meanwhile, the control group rested. The study finished after the post-tests were implemented. The data obtained from this study were analysed on the SPSS 22 package programme at the p<0.01 and p<0.05 significance levels by using the "Descriptive" and the "Wilcoxon signed rank test". The result obtained from study before and after dynamic warm ups showed that, the flexibility values were found statistically significant in the experimental group (p<0.01) in contrast to the control group's flexibility values (p>0.05). In terms of static balance values, the experimental group and the control groups' centre of pressure in the x-axis, centre of pressure in the y-axis, average forward-backward speed, average medium-lateral speed, perimeter values were not found significantly different (p>0.05). In addition, for the experimental group, it was found that pre and post dynamic warm ups' medium lateral standard deviation and ellipse area values were significantly different (p<0.05). Control groups' medium lateral standard deviation and ellipse area values were not found significantly different (p>0.05). The pre and post dynamic warm ups' forward-backward standard deviation values were found to be significant in both experimental and control groups (p<0.01) (p<0.05). The results of the proprioceptive senses assessment indicated that the experimental and the control groups' stabile index, average force variance, average track error were not statistically significant (p>0.05). As a result, dynamic warm up has a higher positive effect on flexibility than static balance, and has no effect on proprioceptive senses."> [PDF] GENÇ FUTBOLCULARDA DİNAMİK ISINMANIN STATİK DENGE VE PROPRİOSEPTİF DUYUYA AKUT ETKİSİ | [PDF] THE ACUTE EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC WARM UP ON STATIC BALANCE AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE SENSE IN YOUNG SOCCER PLAYERS 0,05). Statik denge değerlerine bakıldığında; deney ve kontrol gruplarının ortalama basınç merkezi x, ortalama basınç merkezi y, ortalama ileri-geri hız, ortalama sağa-sola hız, kullanılan çevre değerleri için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Deney grubu için sağa-sola salınım sapması ve kullanılan alan değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,01). Kontrol grubu için sağa-sola salınım sapması ve kullanılan alan değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir (p>0,05). Deney ve kontrol gruplarının öne-arkaya salınım sapması değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,01), (p<0,05). Proprioseptif duyu bulguları incelendiğinde; deney ve kontrol gruplarının stabilite göstergesi, ortalama kuvvet varyansı, ortalama takip hatası değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir (p>0,05). Araştırmanın sonucunda; dinamik ısınmanın, esnekliğe olumlu yönde etki ettiği, statik dengeye az düzeyde olumlu etki ettiği ve Proprioseptif duyuya etki etmediği tespit edilmiştir."> 0,05). Statik denge değerlerine bakıldığında; deney ve kontrol gruplarının ortalama basınç merkezi x, ortalama basınç merkezi y, ortalama ileri-geri hız, ortalama sağa-sola hız, kullanılan çevre değerleri için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Deney grubu için sağa-sola salınım sapması ve kullanılan alan değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,01). Kontrol grubu için sağa-sola salınım sapması ve kullanılan alan değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir (p>0,05). Deney ve kontrol gruplarının öne-arkaya salınım sapması değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,01), (p<0,05). Proprioseptif duyu bulguları incelendiğinde; deney ve kontrol gruplarının stabilite göstergesi, ortalama kuvvet varyansı, ortalama takip hatası değerlerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir (p>0,05). Araştırmanın sonucunda; dinamik ısınmanın, esnekliğe olumlu yönde etki ettiği, statik dengeye az düzeyde olumlu etki ettiği ve Proprioseptif duyuya etki etmediği tespit edilmiştir. This research was aimed to determine the acute effects of dynamic warm up on static balance and proprioceptive sense in young soccer players. 41 young licenced soccer player training regularly and did not have any surgical operations in the last one year (with an average age of 16.46 ± 0.66 for the experimental group, and 16,50 ± 0,70 for the control group) participated in this research. 41 soccer players were randomly divided into two groups as the experimental group (n:23) and the control group (n:18). The Pro-Kin, Technobody equipment was used for the participants' balance and proprioceptive sense measurements. After performing the initial measurements, the experimental group participated in the warm-up exercise. Meanwhile, the control group rested. The study finished after the post-tests were implemented. The data obtained from this study were analysed on the SPSS 22 package programme at the p<0.01 and p<0.05 significance levels by using the "Descriptive" and the "Wilcoxon signed rank test". The result obtained from study before and after dynamic warm ups showed that, the flexibility values were found statistically significant in the experimental group (p<0.01) in contrast to the control group's flexibility values (p>0.05). In terms of static balance values, the experimental group and the control groups' centre of pressure in the x-axis, centre of pressure in the y-axis, average forward-backward speed, average medium-lateral speed, perimeter values were not found significantly different (p>0.05). In addition, for the experimental group, it was found that pre and post dynamic warm ups' medium lateral standard deviation and ellipse area values were significantly different (p<0.05). Control groups' medium lateral standard deviation and ellipse area values were not found significantly different (p>0.05). The pre and post dynamic warm ups' forward-backward standard deviation values were found to be significant in both experimental and control groups (p<0.01) (p<0.05). The results of the proprioceptive senses assessment indicated that the experimental and the control groups' stabile index, average force variance, average track error were not statistically significant (p>0.05). As a result, dynamic warm up has a higher positive effect on flexibility than static balance, and has no effect on proprioceptive senses.">

GENÇ FUTBOLCULARDA DİNAMİK ISINMANIN STATİK DENGE VE PROPRİOSEPTİF DUYUYA AKUT ETKİSİ

Bu araştırmada, genç futbolcularda dinamik ısınmanın, denge ve propriosetif duyuya akut etkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Çalışmaya, lisanslı olarak futbol oynayan, yaş ortalamaları deney grubu için: 16,46 ± 0,66 ve kontrol grubu için: 16,50 ± 0,70 olan 41 genç futbolcu katıldı. Futbolcular randomize olarak 23 kişi deney ve 18 kişi kontrol grubunda olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. Denge ve proprioseptif duyu ölçümleri için Pro-Kin, Tecnobody cihazı kullanıldı. İlk ölçümler yapıldıktan sonra, dinamik ısınma egzersizleri deney grubuna yaptırıldı. Kontrol grubundan ise bu esnada dinlenmeleri istendi. Daha sonra son testler uygulandıktan sonra çalışma sonlandırıldı. Araştırmadan elde edilen veriler; SPSS 22 paket programında, "Descriptives", "Wilcoxon İşaretli Sıra Testi" kullanılarak p

THE ACUTE EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC WARM UP ON STATIC BALANCE AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE SENSE IN YOUNG SOCCER PLAYERS

This research was aimed to determine the acute effects of dynamic warm up on static balance and proprioceptive sense in young soccer players. 41 young licenced soccer player training regularly and did not have any surgical operations in the last one year (with an average age of 16.46 ± 0.66 for the experimental group, and 16,50 ± 0,70 for the control group) participated in this research. 41 soccer players were randomly divided into two groups as the experimental group (n:23) and the control group (n:18). The Pro-Kin, Technobody equipment was used for the participants' balance and proprioceptive sense measurements. After performing the initial measurements, the experimental group participated in the warm-up exercise. Meanwhile, the control group rested. The study finished after the post-tests were implemented. The data obtained from this study were analysed on the SPSS 22 package programme at the p<0.01 and p<0.05 significance levels by using the "Descriptive" and the "Wilcoxon signed rank test". The result obtained from study before and after dynamic warm ups showed that, the flexibility values were found statistically significant in the experimental group (p<0.01) in contrast to the control group's flexibility values (p>0.05). In terms of static balance values, the experimental group and the control groups' centre of pressure in the x-axis, centre of pressure in the y-axis, average forward-backward speed, average medium-lateral speed, perimeter values were not found significantly different (p>0.05). In addition, for the experimental group, it was found that pre and post dynamic warm ups' medium lateral standard deviation and ellipse area values were significantly different (p<0.05). Control groups' medium lateral standard deviation and ellipse area values were not found significantly different (p>0.05). The pre and post dynamic warm ups' forward-backward standard deviation values were found to be significant in both experimental and control groups (p<0.01) (p<0.05). The results of the proprioceptive senses assessment indicated that the experimental and the control groups' stabile index, average force variance, average track error were not statistically significant (p>0.05). As a result, dynamic warm up has a higher positive effect on flexibility than static balance, and has no effect on proprioceptive senses.

___

  • 1. Aksu S (1994): Denge Eğitiminin Etkilerinin Postural Stres Testi ile Değerlendirilmesi, Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • 2. Alp E (2008): Kısa Ve Uzun Dönemde Farklı Germe Egzersizlerinin Proprioseptif Duyuya Etkisi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Ögretimi Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Burdur.
  • 3. Alter MJ (2004): Science of Flexibility. 3. Edition, USA; Human Kinetics,
  • 4. Aydin T, Yildiz Y, Yildiz C, Atesalp S, Kalyon, TA (2002): Proprioception of the ankle: a comparison between female teenaged gymnasts and controls. Foot & ankle international, 23(2), 123-129.
  • 5. Barrack R, Skinner H, Brunet M (1983): Joint Laxity and Proprioception in the Knee. Physician Sports Med.11:130-135.
  • 6. Barrack R, Skinner H, Brunet M (1984): Joint Kinesthesia in the Highly Trained Knee. J Sports Med. 24:18-20.
  • 7. Bartlett MJ, Warren PJ (2002): Effect of warming up on knee proprioception before sporting activity. British journal of sports medicine, 36(2), 132-134.
  • 8. Behm DG, Bambury A, Cahill F, Power K (2004): Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 36, 1397-1402.
  • 9. Bereket K, Tülin A (2015): Farklı Isınma Yöntemlerinin Esnekliğe, Sıçramaya Ve Dengeye Etkisi. Niğde Beden Egitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1).
  • 10. Bressel E, Yonker JC, Kras J, Heath EM (2007): Comparison of static and dynamic balance in female collegiate soccer, basketball, and gymnastics athletes. Journal of athletic training, 42(1), 42.
  • 11. Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J (2009): Sensory impairments in quiet standing in subjects with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 15(1):59-67.
  • 12. Costa PB, Graves BS, Whitehurst M, Jacobs PL (2009): The acute effects of different durations of static stretching on dynamic balance performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 23(1), 141-147.
  • 13. Çoknaz H, Yıldırım NÜ, Özengin N (2008): Artistik cimnastikçilerde farklı germe sürelerin performansa etkisi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi; 6: 151-157.
  • 14. Denerel HN (2011): Statik Ve Dinamik Germe Egzersizlerinin Dinamik Denge Üzerine Etkisi'' Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Spor Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, [In Turkish]
  • 15. Erdem R, Ulu D (2004): Futbol Takımı Taraftarlığının Hastane Çalışanları Üzerine Etkisi. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt:7, Sayı:1 (2004)
  • 16. Erkmen N, Suveren S, Göktepe S, Yazıcıoğlu K (2007): Farklı Branşlardaki Sporcuların Denge Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması, Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, (3):115-122.
  • 17. Evans RK, Knight KL, Draper DO, Parcell AC (2002): Effects of warm-up before eccentric exercise on indirect markers of muscle damage. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 34(12), 1892-1899.
  • 18. Fletcher IM, Jones B (2004): The effect of different warm-up stretch protocols on 20 meter sprint performance in trained rugby union players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 18(4), 885-888.
  • 19. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, Swain DP (2011): American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 43(7), 1334-1359.
  • 20. Güngör G (2010): Gemi Zabitleri - Zabit Adayları İle Kürek Sporcularının Karşılaştırmalı Denge Analizleri, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Deniz Ulaştırma Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
  • 21. Göktepe M, Şenel Ö, Özkan A (2015): Bazı Raket Sporlarıyla Uğraşan Sporcuların Reaksiyon Zamanları Ve El Kavrama Kuvvetleri İle Denge Ve Proprioseptif Duyularının İlişkisi. Sstb International Refereed Academic Journal Of Sports, Health & Medical Sciences, 17.
  • 22. Handrakis JP, Southard VN, Abreu JM, Aloisa M, Doyen MR., Echevarria LM, Douris PC (2010): Static stretching does not impair performance in active middle-aged adults. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(3), 825-830.
  • 23. Hands B, Larkin D (2006): Physical fitness differences in children with and without motor learning difficulties. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(4), 447-456.
  • 24. Holcomb WR (2000): Stretching and warmup. In: Essentials of Strength and Conditioning. Baechle T, Earle R eds. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  • 25. Irrgang JJ, Whitney SL, Cox ED (2010): Balance and proprioceptive training for rehabilitation of the lower extremity. JSR, 3(1).
  • 26. Karadenizli ZI, Erkut O, Ramazanoglu N, Uzun S, Camlıguney AF, Bozkurt S, Sırmen B (2014): Comparision of dynamic and static balance in adolescents handball and soccer players. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 16(1), 47-54.
  • 27. Karakaş F (2012): Çoklu Reaksiyon Zamanı İle İzokinetik Denge Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Samsun.
  • 28. Kokkonen J, Nelson AG, Kornwell A (1998): Acute stretching exercises inhibit maximal strength performance. Res Q Exerc Sport; 69: 411-5.
  • 29. Köklü Y, Özkan A, Alemdaroğlu U, Ersöz G (2009): Genç Futbolcuların Bazı Fiziksel Uygunluk ve Somatotip Özelliklerinin Oynadıkları Mevkilere Göre Karşılaştırılması" Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, VII (2) 61-68.
  • 30. Köse B (2014): Farklı Isınma Yöntemlerinin Esnekliğe Sıçramaya Ve Dengeye Etkisi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Samsun.
  • 31. Lephart SM, Fu FH (2000): Proprioception and Neuromuscular Control in Joint Stability, Human Kinetics. 237-244.
  • 32. Lephart SM, Giraldo JL, Borsa PA, Fu FH (1996): Knee joint proprioception: a comparison between female intercollegiate gymnasts and controls. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 4(2), 121-124.
  • 33. Lephart SM, Pincivero DM, Giraido JL, Fu FH (1997): The role of proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries. The American journal of sports medicine, 25(1), 130-137.
  • 34. McHugh MP, Cosgrave CH (2010): To stretch or not to stretch: the role of stretching in injury prevention and performance. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 20(2), 169- 181.
  • 35. Moran GT, McGlynn G (1997): Dynamics of Training and Conditioning. Second Edition. USA: WBC/McGraw-Hill.
  • 36. Norris JM, Langefeld CD, Scherzinger AL, Rich SS, Bookman E, Beck SR, Saad MF, Haffner SM, Bergman RN, Bowden DW, Wagenknecht LE (2005): Quantitative trait loci for abdominal fat and BMI in hispanicamericans and African-Americans: The IRAS family study, International Journal of Obesity, 29: 67-77
  • 37. Özkaptan BM (2006): Çocuklarda farklı ısınma germe protokollerinin sürat performansına etkisi, Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya.
  • 38. Prosperini L, Fortuna D, Giannì C, et al. (2013): The diagnostic accuracy of static posturography in predicting accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27:45-52.
  • 39. Saal JA (1991): Common American football injuries. Sports medicine, 12(2), 132-147.
  • 40. Sharma L (1999): Proprioceptive impairment in knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, 25(2), 299-314.
  • 41. Shellock FG, Prentice WE (1985): Warming-up and stretching for improved physical performance and prevention of sports-related injuries. Sports Medicine, 2(4), 267-278.
  • 42. Song J, Nı, C, Zhang K (2013): A comparative study on proprioception between lower limbs of unaffected side of hemiplegic patients after stroke and lower limbs of normal person. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1, 009.
  • 43. South M, George KP (2007): The effect of peroneal muscle fatigue on ankle joint position sense. Physical Therapy in sport, 8(2), 82-87.
  • 44. Taylor RW, Keil D, Gold EJ, Williams SM, Goulding A (1998): Body mass index, waist girth and waist-to-hip ratio as indexes of total and regional adiposity in woman: Evalution using receiver operating characteristics curves, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 67:44-49.
  • 45. Tessalina SG, Herrington RJ, Taylor RN, Sundblad K, Maslennikov VV, Orgeval JJ (2016): Lead isotopic systematics of massive sulphide deposits in the Urals: Applications for geodynamic setting and metal sources. Ore Geology Reviews, 72, 22-36.
  • 46. Unick J, Kieffer HS, Cheesman W, Feeney A (2005): The acute effects of static and ballistic stretching on vertical jump performance in trained women. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 19(1), 206-212.
  • 47. Url 1 (2016): http://www.tecnobody.it (last access date: 10 January 2016).
  • 48. Young W, Elliott S (2001): Acute effects of static stretching, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching, and maximum voluntary contractions on explosive force production and jumping performance. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 72(3), 273-279.
  • 49. Walker B (2007): The Anatomy of Stretching. 1. Edition, UK; Lotus Publishing.
  • 50. Wang S, Yang J, Zhu Y (2011): Reliability and validity of static balance measures in hemiplegic patients using balance feedback training equipment. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 11, 013.