BEDENSEL ENGELLİ SPORCULARIN DOPİNGE İLİŞKİN GÖRÜ

Bu çalışmada bedensel engelli sporcuların doping kullanımına ilişkin olan görüşleri incelenmiştir. Çalışma grububedensel engelli spor branşlarında faal olan yirmisporcudan oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden, maksimum çeşitlilikörneklemesi tercih edilmiştir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Görüşmeler ve elde edilen veriler not alınarak kaydedilmiştir ve daha sonra bilgisayar ortamında hızlı bir şekilde aktarılarak tematik analiz yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucu yedi tema altında elde edilen bulgular değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan tematik analiz ile, bedensel engelli sporcuların doping kullanma nedenleri, dopingin nasıl önlenebileceğine dair düşünceleri, dopingin sağlığa olan olumsuz etkileri, spor etiği ve doping ilişkisi, doping kullanımından sakınan ve dopingin karşısında olan ideal sporcu profili, yasal süreç ve yaptırımların etkilerine ilişkin temalar elde edilmiştir. Doping kullanım nedenleri ve dopingin zararlarına ilişkin görüşleralanyazınile örtüşmektedir. Katılımcıların bazıları, Türkiye’deki bedensel engelli sporcuların çevre baskısı ve ödüller nedeniyle doping kullanma gereği duyduklarını, sporcu kişiliğinin de sporcuları doping kullanımına yönelten etkenler arasında olduğunu ifade etmişlerdir. Katılımcılar, dopingin asıl kullanım amacının, kazanma hırsı ve sporcunun performansını arttırma isteği olduğunubelirtmişlerdir.

PHYSICALLY DISABLED ATHLETES' VIEWS ON DOPING

In thi sstudy, theopinions of thephysicallydisabledathletesabouttheuse of doping wereexamined. Thestudygroupconsists of twentyathletesactive in thebranches of physicaldisabilities. Inthestudy, maximumdiversitysamplingwaspreferredfrompurposivesamplingmethods. Semi-structuredinterview form wasused as data collectiontool. Theinterviewsandthe data obtainedwererecordedwith a note, andthentheyweretransferredtothecomputer in a fastmannerand a thematicanalysiswasmade. As a result of theanalysis, thefindingsobtainedunder seven themeswereevaluated. With the thematic analysis, the reasons of the use of doping by athletes with disabilities, their thoughts on how to prevent doping, the negative effects of doping on health, the relationship between sports ethics and doping, the use of doping, and the ideal athlete profile against doping, the effects of legal process and sanctions have been obtained. Thereasonsfortheuse of doping andtheconsequences of doping areconsistentwiththeliterature. Some of theparticipants, thephysicallydisabledathletes in Turkeybecause of environmentalpressureandtherewardstheyneedtouse doping of athletespersonalityathletesalsostatedthatamongthefactorsthatledto doping. Participantsexpressedthe main purpose of doping as thedesiretowinandthedesiretoincreasetheperformance of theathlete.

PDF

___

Andy M. (2004). Genetically Modified Athletes–Biomedical Ethics, Gene Doping, AndSport. Routledge, London
Ajzen I. (1991). Thetheory of planned behavior. Organizationa lBehavior And Human Decision Processes 50, 179-211.
Ajzen I. (2005). Attitudes, Personality And Behavior (2nd. Edition). Mcgraw- Hill, Milton- Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Angela J. Theodore F. (2006). Gene doping insports: the science and ethics of genetically modified athletes. Adv Genet, 51:1-110.
Archer J.R. Dargan P.I., Lostia A.M., Van Der Walt J., Henderson K., Drake N., Kicman A.T. (2015). Running an unknown risk: a marathon death associated with the use of 1, 3-dimethylamylamine (dmaa). Drug Testing And Analysis, 7(5), 433-438.
AssociatedPress. (2017). 10 visually impaired russian athletes banned for doping. Erişim: [http://olympics.nbcsports.com/2017/07/07/blind-athletes-russian-doping-powerlifters/]. Erişim Tarihi: 30.01.2018
Backhouse S.H., Whitaker L., Patterson L., Erickson K., Mckenna J. (2016). Social Psychology of Doping in Sport: A Mixed Studies Narrative Synthesis. Leed Beckett University Institute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure. [https://www.wada- ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/literature_review_update__final_2016.pdf]. Erişim Tarihi: 30.01.2018.
Bavlı Ö., Erkan E. (2007). Sporda ani ölüm, Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 21 (3), 149-152.
Bhambhani Y., Mactavish J., Warren S., ThompsonWr., Webborn A., Bressan E., De MelloMt., Tweedy S., Malone L., Frojd K., Van De Vliet P., Vanlandewijck Y. (2010). Boosting in athletes with high-level spinal cordinjury: knowledge, incidence and attitudes of athletes in paralympic sport. Disability And Rehabilitation, 32, 2172– 2190.
Bourdon P.C.,Cardinale M., Murray A., Gastin P., Kellmann M., Varley M.C., Gabbett T.J., Coutts A.J., Burgess J. D, Gregson W, Cable N. T. (2017). Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement. International Journal Of Sports Physicology And Performance, 12(2), 2-161.
Börjesson A., Gårevik N., Dahl M., Rane E., Kström L. (2016). Recruitment To Doping And Help-Seeking Behavior Of Eight Female AAS Users. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 11: 11.
Braun V., Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis inpsychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Crookers Del. (2015). What does ‘doping’ mean in athletics and why do athletes take banned substances? Erişim: [http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33755488/what-does-doping-mean-in-athletics-and-why-do-athletes-take-banned-substances]. Erişim Tarihi: 30. Ocak. 2018
Çınar V., Şebin K., Öztürk M.E. (2005). Doping ve sporcularda kullanımı, Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(4). 27-31.
Demirbilek Celal. (2013). ‘Dinamit’le ölüme. Erişim: [http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dinamitle-olume-24940541]. Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2018
Dinçer N. (2010). Elit sporcuların doping hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerinin belirlenmesi (Doktora Tezi), Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Donovan R.J., Egger G.,Kapernick V., Mendoza J. (2002). A conceptual framework for achieving performance enhancing drug compliance in sport. Sports Medicine, 32(4), 269-284.
Efverström A., Bäckström Å., Ahmadi N., Hoff D. (2016). Contexts and conditions for a level playing field: elite athletes’ perspectives on anti-doping in practice. Performance Enhancement &Health, 5(2), 77-85.
Erkiner K. (2004). Dünya’da Spor Hukuku Ve Dopingin Yeri, TFF Yayınları. s.137-163
Ferraresi C., Bertucci R. D. (2016). Strength Training: Methods, Health Benefits And Doping. Nova Science Publisher, USA.
Flaherty G., O'connor R., Johnston N. (2016). Altitude training for elite endurance athletes: a review for the travel medicine practitioner. Travel Medicine And infectious Disease, 1(3), 200-211.
Ghobain M A. (2017). Theuse of performance enhancing substances (doping) by athletes in saudi arabia. J Family Community Med. 24(3), 151-155.
Güner R. (2004). Doping Madde Ve Yöntemlerinin Etki Ve Yan Etkileri. Doping Ve Futbolda Performans Artırma Yöntemleri, Ed.: T. Atasü, İ. Yücesir, Form Reklam Hizmetleri. 413-423.
Hon O., Bottenburg M. (2017). True dopers or negligent athletes? an analysis of anti-doping rule violations reported to the world anti-doping agency 2010–2012, Substance Use And Misuse, 52(14), 1932-1936.
Jayaseelan G., Bennett P.N., Bradshaw W., Wang W., Rawson H. (2018). Exercise benefits and barriers: the perceptions of people receiving hemodialysis. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2), 185-219.
Karataş M., Karataş Ö., Çevrim H. (2012). Beden eğitimi ve spor yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin doping kullanımına bakışları ve etik. Düzce Tıp Dergisi, 14(3). 28-31.
Khan B, Ahmed A, Abid G. (2016). Using the ‘Big-Five’for Assessing Personality Traits of the Champions: An Insinuation for the Sports Industry.
Khing T. (2014). Performance-EnhancingDrugs in Sports. Abdo Publishing Company. USA.
Küçük E. (2011). Planlanmış davranış teorisi çerçevesinde mali müşavir (smmm) olma niyetinin altında yatan faktörlerin analizi, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(14), 145-162.
López B. (2014). CreatingFear: The ‘Doping Deaths’, Risk Communication And The Anti-Doping Campaign. International Journal of Sport Policy And Politics, 6(2), 213-225.
Loland S., Hopeller, H. (2012). Justifiying anti-doping: thefairopportunityprincipleandthebiology of performanceenhancement, EuropeanJournal of SportScience, 12(4), 347-353.
Malcolm D., Waddington I. (2008). No systematic doping doping in football: A CiriticalReview, Soccer Society, 9(2), 198-214.
Mandarić S., Delibašić, V. (2014). Sanctionsfor doping in sport, PhysicalCulture, 68(1), 39-49.
Maquirriain J. (2010). Epidemiologic alanalysis of doping offences in the Professional tenis circuit, Journal Of Occupational Medicine And Toxicology, 5(30), 1-6.
Maquirriain J., Baglione R. (2016). Doping offences in male professional tennis: how does sanction affect players’ career?,SpringerPlus 5(1), 1-4.
Menicucci P. (2005). Judge investigates fiorentina deaths. Erişim: [https://www.theguardian. com/football/2005/mar/03/europeanfootball.sport]. Erişim Tarihi: 30.06. 2018.
Mcrae D. (2010). Ben Johson: ‘My revelations will shock the sporting world’. Erişim: [https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2010/oct/05/ben-johnson-drugs-olympics]. Erişim Tarihi: 30.06. 2018.
Mcnamee M., Olivier S., Wainwright P. (2006). Research Ethics in Exercise, HealthAnd Sports Sciences. Routledge, s, 8, 135, 130.
Morentin B., Callado L.F., Garcia Hernández S., Bodegas A., Lucena J. (2018). The role of toxic substances in sudden cardiac death. Spanish Journal Of Legal Medicine. 44(1), 18-23.
Møller V. (2009). The Ethics Of Doping And Anti-Doping: Redeeming The Soul Of Sport? Routledge, London.
Montalvo A.M., Shaefer H., Rodriguez Li.T., Epnere K., Myer G.D. (2017). Retrospective injury epidemiology and risk factors for injury in crossfit. Journal Of Sports Science&Medicine, 16(1), 53.
Morente-Sánchez J., Leruit M., Mateo-March M., Zabala M. (2013). Attitudestowards doping Morente in spanish competitive female cyclists vs. triathletes. Journal Of ScienceandCycling, 2(2), 40-48.
Özbek O. (1999). Sporda etik dışı davranış alanları ve etik ilkeler, Gazi Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 4, 38-50.
Özbek, O., Doğaner, S. (2017). “Sporda Doping Kullanımına ve Etkilerine İlişkin Görüşlerin İncelenmesi” Sözel Bildiri, 15. Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi, 15-18 Kasım, Antalya.
Petróczi A., Aidman E. (2008). Psychological Drivers in Doping: The Life-Cycle Model of Performance Enhancement. SubstanceAbuseTreatment, Prevention, andPolicy, 3(7), 1-12.
Petróczi A. (2003). Exploringthe doping dilemma in elite sport: can athletes' attitudes be responsible for doping. (doctoratethesis)University Of Northern Colorado, The Graduate School, UMI Number: 3071864. Erişim: [https://search.proquest.com/]. Erişim Tarihi:30.06.2018
Ring C., Kavussanu, M., Simms M., Mazanov J. (2018). Effects of situational costs and benefits on projected doping likelihood. Psychology Of Sport And Exercise, 34, 88-94.
Selenoğlu Murat. (2014). ‘Kas’ıtlı ölüm. Erişim: [https://www.aksam.com.tr/guncel/kasitli-olum/haber-305922]. Erişim Tarihi: 30. Haziran. 2018
Strelan P, Boeckmann R J (2003). A new model for understanding performance – enhancing druguse by elite athletes. Journal of applied spor psychology, 15(2), 176-183.
World Anti Doping Agency. (2013). Anti-doping testing figures testing authority report 2013.
World Anti Doping Agency. (2014). Antidoping testingfigures testing authority report 2014.
World Anti Doping Agency. (2015). Anti-doping testing figures testing authority report 2015.
World Anti Doping Agency. (2018). Who we are. Erişim: [https://www.wada-ama.org/en/who-we-are]. Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2018
World Anti Doping Agency. (2018). What we do. Erişim: [https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do]. Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2018.
Wright H. (2009). Steroids in sports: the rise and fall of great athletes. Erişim: [https://bleacherreport.com/articles/209217-steroids-in-sports-the-rise-and-fall-of-great-athletes]. Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2018.
Yıldırım A., Şimşek H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara.