ANALYSIS OF THE RELATION BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION LEVELS AND ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS OF ACADEMICIANS
ANALYSIS OF THE RELATION BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION LEVELS AND ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS OF ACADEMICIANS
The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between the organizational justice and organizational identificationperceptions of the academicians in terms of some variables. The descriptive review model was used in the study as the method. As thedata collection tool, the “Organizational Justice Perception Scale”, which was developed by Colquitt (2001) whose Turkish adaptationwas performed by Özmen, Arnak and Özeri (2007), and the “Organizational Identification Scale”, which was developed by Mael andAshforth (1992) whose Turkish adaptation was performed by Polat (2009), were used in the study. The study group consisted of 207volunteering participants (152 male, 55 female) who worked at Sports Sciences Faculties of universities and who were selected accordingto the simple random sampling method The Multilinear Regression Analysis was used to examine the effect of organizational justicescores of the academicians who worked at Sports Sciences Faculties of universities on organizational identification levels. For the purposeof determining the difference between the organizational justice and organizational identification levels of the academicians according togender and marital status, the Independent Samples t-test was applied; and the One-Way ANOVA test was applied to determine thedifference according to service years and the department worked at. The significance level was determined as 0.05.As a result, it was determined that there is a positive and significant relation between the procedural justice, distributional justice andinterpersonal justice levels, which are among the sub-dimensions of organizational justice of academicians who worked at sport sciencesfaculties, and their organizational identification levels; the organizational identification levels of the participants were high; their organizationaljustice perceptions were above the medium level, and the service years, which is one of the demographical variables, increased,it had a positive effect on these levels.
___
- Adams JS (1963): Toward an understanding of inequity.
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
67, 422.
- Akduman G, Hatipoğlu Z, Yüksekbilgili Z (2015):
Medeni durumuna göre örgütsel adalet algısı. Uluslararası
Akademik Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1),
1-13.
- Akyel Y (2017): Yönetim bağlamında adalet ve güven.
Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Alexander S, Ruderman M (1987): The role of procedural
and distributive justice in organizational behavior.
Social Justice Research, 1: 177-98.
- Ambrose ML, Schminke M (2009): The role of
overall justice judgments in organizational justice
research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491–
500.
- Aytaç KY (2017): Investigating the working life
quality and organizational commitment behaviors of
academicians carrying on duties in faculties of
sports science. European Journal of Education
Studies, 3(11), 603-628.
- Bamber EM, Iyer VM (2002): Big 5 auditors’ professional
and organizational identification: Consistency
or conflict? Auditing: A Journal of Practice
& Theory, 21(2), 21-38.
- Başar U (2011): Örgütsel adalet algısı, örgütsel özdeşleşme
ve iş tatmini arasındaki ilişkilere yönelik
görgül bir araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kara Harp
Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
- Biçkes DM, Yılmaz C (2017): Çalışanların örgütsel
güven algılamalarının özdeşleşme düzeyleri üzerindeki
etkisi: amprik bir çalışma. Kahramanmaraş
Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,
14(2), 301-322.
- Bies RJ, Moag JF (1986): Interactional justice:
Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki,
B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research
on negotiations in organizations, 1, 43-55, Greenwich,
CT: JAI Press.
- Brewer MB, Kramer RM (1986): Choice behavior
in social dilemmas: effects of social identity, group size and decision framing. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
- Büyüköztürk Ş (2011): Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi
el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Candan H (2014): Çalışanların örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel
güven algılamalarının örgütsel bağlılığa etkisi:
bir kamu kurumu üzerinde araştırma. Gaziantep
University Journal of Social Sciences,
13(4):889-917.
- Cheney G (1983): On the various changing meanings
of organization membership: A field study of
organizational identification, Communication Monographs,
50, 342-362.
- Chernyak-Hai L, Tziner A (2012): Organizational
citizenship behaviors (OCBS): Socio- psychological
antecedents and consequences. International Review
of Social Psychology, 25(3/4), 53–92.
- Cheung MF, Law MC (2008). Relationships of organizational
justice and organizational identification:
The mediating effects of perceived organizational
support in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Business
Review, 14(2), 213-231.
- Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE (2001): The role of
justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
86(2): 278-321.
- Colquitt JA (2001): On the dimensionality of organizational
justice: a construct validation of a measure.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
- Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter CO, Ng
KY (2001): Justice at the millenium: A meta analytic
review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-
445.
- Cremer D (2005): Procedural and distributive justice
effects moderated by organizational identification.
Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(1), 4-13.
- Cropanzano R, Folger R (1991): “Procedural justice
and worker motivation” in R. Steers & L. Porter
(Ed.), Motivation and Work Behavior, New York:
McGraw–Hill, 131–143.
- Cropanzano R, Prehar CA, Chen PY (2002): Using
social exchange theory to distinguish procedural
from interactional justice. Group and Organization
Management, 27, 324–351.
- Cüce H, Güney S, Tayfur Ö (2013): Örgütsel adalet
algılarının örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisini
belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,
31(1): 1-30.
- Çakar ND (2015): Toplumsal cinsiyet temelinde örgütsel
adalet algısı: etik iklimin rolü. KADEM Kadın
Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 79-94.
- Çetinkaya M, Çimenci S (2014): Örgütsel adalet algısının
örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi
ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü: Yapısal
eşitlik modeli çalışması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi,
12(23), 237-278.
- Çokluk Ö, Şekerc?oğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş (2010):
Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS
ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Dailey RC, Kirk DJ (1992): Distributive and procedural
justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction
and intent to turnover. Human Relations, 45(3): 305-
317.
- Deutsch M (1975): Equity, equality, and need: What
determines which value will be used as the basis for
distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31,
137-149.
- Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV (1994): Organizational
images and member identification. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
- Edwards MR (2005): Organizational identification:
A conceptual and operational review. International
Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 207-230.
- Foley S, Kıdder DL, Powell GN (2002): The perceived
glass ceiling and justice perceptions: An investigation
of hispanic law associates. Journal of
Management, 28(4), 471-496.
- Folger R, Konovsky MA (1989): Effects of procedural
and distributive justice on reactions to pay
raise decisions, Academic Management Journal,
32(1), 115– 30.
- Greenberg J (1987): A taxonomy of organizational
justice theories. Academy of Management Review,
1987, 9-22.
- Greenberg J (1990a): Organizational justice: yesterday,
today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management,
16, 399-432.
- Greenberg J (1990b): Looking fair us being fair:
Managing impressions of organizational justice. Research
in Organizational Behavior, 12(1), 111-157.
- Greenberg J (1993): “The social side of fairness: interpersonal
and informational classes of organizational
justice” Cropanzano (eds.) Justice in the
Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource
Management, Hillsale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
- Homans GC (1961): Social behavior: Its elementary
forms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- İşcan ÖF (2006): Dönüştürücü/etkileşimci liderlik
algısı ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisinde bireysel
farklılıkların rolü. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 11(6),
160-177.
- Karabey CN, İşcan ÖF (2007): Örgütsel özdeşleşme,
örgütsel imaj ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı
ilişkisi: bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi
ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 231-241.
- Karasar N (2005): Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara:
Nobel Yayın & Dağıtım.
- Konovsky, MA (2000): Understanding procedural
justice and its ımpact on business organizations.
Journal of Management, 26(3), 489-511.
- Korkut H (1990): Üniversitelerde akademik olmayan
personelin iş doyumu ve örgütle özdeşleşmesi.
Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu Matbaası.
- Leventhal GS (1976): The distribution of rewards
and resources in groups and organizations. In L.
Berkowitz & W. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental
social psychology, 9, 91-131, New York:
Academic Press.
- Leventhal, GS (1980): What should be done with
equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness
in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg,
& R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances
in theory and research, 27-55, New York: Plenum
Press.
- Lipponen J, Wisse B, Perala J (2011): Perceived justice
and group identification: The moderating role of
previous identification. Journal of personnel psychology,
10(1), 13.
- Lovelace K, Rosen B (1996): Differences in achieving
person-organization fit among diverse groups of
managers. Journal of Management, 22, 703-722.
- Mael F, Ashforth BE (1992): Alumni and their alma
mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of
organizational identification. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
- Moorman, RH (1991): Relationship between organizational
justice and organizational citizenship behaviors:
Do fairness perceptions influence employee
citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology,
76, 845-855.
- Mowday RT (1987): Equity theory predictions of
behavior in organizations, in Steers M.R. Porter,
L.W. (Ed), Motivation and Work Behavior (4. Ed),
New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 89-110.
- Mueller CW, Iverson RD, Jo DG (1999): Justice
evaluations in two cultural contexts: A comparison
of the US and South Korea. Human Relations, 52,
869–893.
- Nartgün ŞS, Kalay M (2014): Öğretmenlerin örgütsel
destek, örgütsel özdeşleşme ile örgütsel sinizm
düzeylerine ilişkin görüşleri, Turkish Studies, 2014;
9(2): 1361-1376.
- . Olkkonen ME, Lipponen J (2006): Relationships between
organizational justice, identification with organization
and work unit, and group-related outcomes.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 100(2), 202-215.
- Özdemir A (2010): Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin algılanan
örgütsel destek, cinsiyet ve kıdem değişkenlerine
göre incelenmesi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar
Dergisi, 14(1), 237-250.
- Özmen ÖN, Arbak Y, Özer Süral P (2007): Adalete
verilen değerin adalet algıları üzerindeki etkisinin
sorgulanmasına ilişkin bir araştırma. Ege Akademik
Bakış, 7(1), 17-33.
- Polat M (2009): Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin öncülleri
ve ardılları üzerine bir saha araştırması, Yayınlanmamış
Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa.
- Polat M, Meydan CH (2010): Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin
sinizm ve işten ayrılma niyeti ile ilişkisi üzerine
bir araştırma. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 145-
172.
- Sarıkoyuncu EŞ, Ağca A (2018): Örgütsel adaletin
muhasebecilerin iş memnuniyeti üzerine etkisi: Kütahya
örneği. Muhasebe ve Finans Dergisi, 77, 27-
44.
- Scott C, Corman S, Cheney G (1988): Development
of a structurational model of ıdentification in the organization”,
Communication Theory, 8(3), 298-336.
- Tolukan E, Şahin MY, Koç M (2016): Cimnastik
antrenörlerinin örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeyleri ve işten
ayrılma niyeti ilişkisi, Turkish Studies, 11(8):
377-398.
- Tompkins PK, Cheney G (1985): Communication
and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations.
Organizational communication: Traditional
themes and new directions, 13, 179-210.
- Turunç Ö (2011): Örgütsel adaletin çalışanların örgütsel
özdeşleşme ve işten ayrılma niyetine etkisi:
örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü. “İş, güç” Endüstrı̇
İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 13(1),
143-166.
- Turunç Ö, Çelik M (2010): Çalışanların algıladıkları
örgütsel destek ve iş stresinin örgütsel özdeşleşme
ve iş performansına etkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi:
Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler
Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 183-206.
- Tyler TR, Blader SL (2003): The group engagement
model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative
behavior. Personality and Social Psychology
Review, 7(4), 349-361.
- Yazıcıoğlu İ, Topaloğlu IG (2009): Örgütsel adalet
ve bağlılık ilişkisi: konaklama işletmelerinde bir uygulama.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi. 1(1): 3-16.