___

• Ariel BG. (1968). ARIEL Performance Analysis System (APAS) [Bilgisayar yazılımı]. Ariel Dynamics, San Diego: USA.
• Aggarwal JK, Cai, Q. (1999). Human motion analysis: a review. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 73, 428–440,
• Alexander RMc. (2003). Modelling approach- es in biomechanics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond, 358, 1429-1435.
• Bokman L, Syungkwon R, Park FC. (2005). 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation: Movement primitives, principal component analysis, and the efficient generation of natural motions. Barcelona, Spain.
• Boyle RD. (1998). Scaling additional contri- butions to principal component analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett, 31, 2047–2053.
• Chen CY, Lee RCT. (1995). A near pattern- matching scheme based upon principal components analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett, 16, 339–345. Medicine Congress: Using PCA for data reduction in different movement pattern. Bulgaristan: Albena Resort.
• Çilli M, Arıtan, S. (2005). 10th Annual Con- gress European College of Sport Sci- ence: PCA application for modeling and simulation of running patterns. Sirbistan: Belgrade.
• Daffertshofer A, Lamoth CJC, Meijer DG, Beek PJ. (2004) . PCA in studying coor- dination and variability: a tutorial. Clinical Biomechanics, 19, 415-428.
• Deluzio KJ, Wyss UP, Costigan PA, Zee B. (2000). Canadian Society for Biomechan- ics. Biomechanical factors in gait of knee osteoarthritis patients, Montreal: QC
• Gavrila DM. (1999). The visual analysis of hu- man movement: A survey. Computer Vi- sion and Understanding, 73, 82-98.
• Hatze H. (1980). A mathematical model for the computational determination of param- eter values of anthropomorphic segments.
• Journal of Biomechanics, 13, 833-843.
• Hollands K, Wing A, Daffertshofer A. (2004). 3rd IEEE EMBSS UK &RI PostGraduate Conference in Biomedical Engineering & Medical Physics: Principal components analysis of contemporary dance kinemat- ics. Southampton: University of South- ampton.
• Jackson JE. (1991). A User Guide to Principle Component. New York: John Wily & Sons Inc.
• Johansson G. (1973). Visual perception of bio- logical motion and a model for its analy- sis. Perceptionand Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
• Johansson G. (1975). Visual motion perception. Scientific American, 232, 76–88.
• Karhunen J, Joutsensalo J. (1995). General- izations of principal component analysis, optimization problems, and neural net- works. Neural Networks, 8, 549–562.
• Khalaf KA, Parnianpour M, Sparto PJ, Barin K. (1999). Feature extraction and quan- tification of the variability of dynamic performance profiles due to the different sagittal lift characteristics. IEEE Trans- actions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 7, 278–288.
• Kudoh S. (2004). Balance maintenance for human-like models with whole body mo- tion. (Doctral Thesis, 2005) . The Depart- ment of Computer Science the Graduate School of Information Science and Tech- nology the University of Tokyo.
• Manly BFJ. (1992). Multivariate Statistical Methods A Premier. London: Chapman & Hall.
• MATLAB [Bilgisayar Yazılımı] , Mathworks Inc., Natick: Ma, USA
• Murase H, Nayar SK. (1993). In: Fall Sym- posium: Machine Learning In Computer
• Vision: Learning and recognition of 3-D
• objects from brightness images. Raleigh:
• North Carolina, Fall.
• Nayar SK, Poggio T. (1996). Early Visual Learn- ing. New York: Oxford University Press,
• Neagoe VE, Iatan IF., Grunwald S. (2003). AMIA
• Annu Symp Proc: A neuro-fuzzy approach
• to classification of ECG signals for isch
• emic heart disease diagnosis, 494–498.
• Perez MA, Nussbaum MA. (2003) . Principal component analysis as an evaluation and classification tool for lower torso sEMG data. Journal of Biomechanics, (36), 1225 –1229.
• Pinkowski B. (1997). Principal component analysis of speech spectrogram images. Pattern Recogn, 30, 777–787.
• Ramsay JO, Munhall KG, Gracco VL, Ostry DJ. (1996). Functional data analyses of lip mo- tion. J Acoust Soc Am., 99, 3718-3727.
• Rodtook S, Rangsanseri Y. (2001). International Conference of information technology cod- ing and computing: Adaptive thresholding of document images based on Laplacian sign. Las Vegas: Nevada.
• Rosales R, Scarloff S. (2000). IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Human Motion: Specialized mappings and the estimation of human body pose from a single image, Austin: TX.
• Sanger TD. (2000). Human arm movements described by a low-dimensional superpo- sition of principal components. The Jour- nal of Neuroscience, 20, 1066–1072
• Sanjeev D, Nandedkar D, Sanders B. (1989). Principal component analysis of the fea- tures of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. Muscle&Nerve, 288-293.
• Santello M, Flanders M and Soechting JF. (1998) . Postural hand synergies for tool use. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 10105–10115.
• Sidenbladh H, Black MJ, Sigal L. (2002). Eu- ropean Conference On Computer Vision: Implict probabalistic models of human motion for synthesis and tracking. Co- penhagen.
• Troje FN. (2002a). Decomposing biological motion: A frame work for analysis and synthesis of human gait pattern. Journal of Vision, 2, 371-387.
• Troje FN. (2002b). In: R. P. Würtz, M. Lappe (Eds.), Dynamic Perception: The little dif- ference: Fourier based synthesis of gen- derspecific biological motion. Berlin: AKA Press, 115-120.
• Yamato J, Ohya J, Ishii K. (1992) . Proc. IEEE Conf. CVPR: Recognizing human action in time sequential images using Hidden Markov Model. Champaign: IL, 379–385.
• Yeadon MR. (1990). The simulation of aerial movement-II. A mathematical inertia model of the human body. Journal of Bio- mechanics, 23, 67-74.