George Bernard Shaw’un “Bayan Warren’ın Mesleği” Eserinin Liberal Feminist Bir Analizi

Ataerkil toplum, kadınların erkeklere tabi olması ve özel alanda hapsedilmesi için sadece erkeklere yasal haklar ve ekonomik güç verir. Sadece eş ve anne rolü verilen kadınlar özgürlük ve yasal haklar talep etmeye başlayınca feminizmin temeli atılmış olur. Bu çalışma, liberal feminist yaklaşımını George Bernard Shaw’un "Bayan Warren'ın Mesleği" (1893) adlı eserine uygulayarak ayrı alanların ataerkil ideolojisi açısından toplumsal cinsiyet rollerini analiz eder. Ataerkil toplumda iyi bir eğitim alamayan Bayan Kitty Warren, bir fahişe ve ardından bir genelev patroniçesi olur. Düşmüş bir kadın olarak, kamusal alanda ekonomik güç kazanmak için hemcinslerini sömürür. Özel alandaki kadınlar gibi özünde gelenekseldir çünkü kızı Vivie'nin kamusal alanda çalışmasını değil, genelevlerde iş ortağı olan zengin, orta yaşlı Crofts ile evlenmesini ister. Yatılı okullarda yetişen ve ‘Yeni Kadın’ tipini temsil eden Vivie Warren, erkeklerle el sıkışır, sigara içer, matematik bilgisine sahiptir, Cambridge mezunudur ve kamusal alanda çalışacak fiziksel güce ve zekaya sahiptir. Bu nedenle, özel alanda kadınlara sadece eş ve anne olma rolü tanıyan ataerkil toplumda evlilik tekliflerini ve annesinin parasını reddeder. Dolayısıyla kadın ve erkeğin zihinsel kapasite açısından doğuştan bir farkı yoktur, fakat kadınlar ataerkil toplum tarafından dayatılan önyargılarla karşı karşıyadır çünkü kadınların erkeklerle aynı eğitimi almalarına izin verilmez.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Liberal feminizm, kadının konumu, ayrı alanlar, George Bernard Shaw, "Bayan Warren'ın Mesleği"

A Liberal Feminist Analysis of George Bernard Shaw’s "Mrs Warren’s Profession"

Patriarchal society gives legal rights and economic power to men only so that women are subject to men and imprisoned in private sphere. When women who are given only the role of a wife and mother begin to demand freedom and legal rights, the basis of feminism appears. This study applies liberal feminist approach to George Bernard Shaw’s "Mrs Warren’s Profession" (1893) to analyse the gender roles in terms of patriarchal ideology of separate spheres. Not receiving proper education in patriarchal society, Mrs Kitty Warren becomes a prostitute and then a brothel mistress. As a fallen woman, she exploits her fellow creatures to gain economic power in public sphere. She is conventional at heart like women in private sphere because she wants her daughter Vivie not to work in public sphere but to marry the rich, middle-aged Crofts who is her business-partner of brothels. Being grown up in boarding schools, Vivie Warren, representing the ‘New Woman’ type, shakes hands with men, smokes cigarettes, has knowledge of mathematics, graduates from Cambridge, and has the physical strength and intelligence to work in public sphere. Therefore, she refuses her mother’s money, and marriage proposals in patriarchal society in which women are allowed only the role of being a wife and a mother in private sphere. Thus, women and men have no innate difference for mental capacity, but women face prejudices imposed by patriarchal society because it does not allow women to take the same education as men.

Keywords:

Liberal feminism, women’s position, separate spheres, George Bernard Shaw, "Mrs Warren's Profession",

PDF

___

Alkan, Halit (2018). George Eliot’ın Middlemarch, Sarah Grand’ın Cennetlik İkizler Ve George Moore’un Esther Waters Romanlarında Kadının Konumunun Psikanalitik Liberal Feminizm Yaklaşımıyla İncelenmesi. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Ankara: Ankara University Institute of Social Sciences.
Alkan, Halit (2019). “A Structuralist Analysis of Women’s Position in George Eliot’s Middlemarch.” Academic Studies in Philology-2019/2. Ed. Zehra Göre Cetinje: IVPE. 53-74. http://www.uakb.org/2019-eylul-kitaplari Access 17.08.2021
Alkan, Halit (2020). “A Liberal Feminist Approach to Bobbie Ann Mason’s Shiloh.” Euroasia Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 7 (3), 99-109. Doi:doi.org/10.38064/eurssh.54 Access 15.08.2021
Arat, Necla (1991). Feminizmin ABC’si. İstanbul: Simavi.
Asena, Duygu (2004). Aslında Aşk da Yok. İstanbul: Doğan.
Barker, Hannah (2005). Women’s History: Britain, 1700-1850. London: Routledge.
Beauvoir, Simone de (1962). The Second Sex. Trans. Howard M. Parshley. London: The New English Library.
Boulding, Elise (1976). The Underside of History, A View of Women Through Time. Boulder: Westview Press.
Caine, Barbara (1997). English Feminism 1780-1980. New York: Oxford Univ Press.
Cannon, Christopher. (1999). “The Rights of Medieval English Women: Crime and the Issue of Representation.” Medieval Crime and Social Control. Ed. Barbara A. Hanawalt and David Wallace. Mineapolis: Claredon Press. 156-185.
Comte, Auguste (1853). The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. Trans. Harriet Martineau. London: Chapman.
Çaha, Ömer. (2003). “Feminizm.” Siyaset. Ed. Mümtaz’er Türköne. Ankara: Lotus. 559-589.
Çakır, Serpil (2009). “Feminizm Ataerkil İktidarın Eleştirisi.” 19. Yüzyıldan 20. Yüzyıla Modern Siyasal Düşünceler. Ed. H. Birsen Örs. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi. 413-475.
Dikici, Erkan (2016). Feminizmin Üç Ana Akımı: Liberal, Marxist ve Radikal Feminizm Teorileri. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 43 (1), 523-532.
Doğramacı, Emel (1992). Türkiye’de Kadının Dünü ve Bugünü. Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası.
Donovan, Josephine (1988). Feminist Theory. New York: The Continuum Publications.
French, Marilyn (1983). Beyond Power: On Women, Man, and Morals. New York: Ballantine Books.
Gies, Frances (1980). Women in the Middle Ages. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins (1966). Women and Economics. New York: Harper & Row.
Greceo, Stephen (1967). Vivie Warren’s Profession: A new look at “Mrs Warren's Profession”. The Shaw Review, 10 (3), 93-99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40682482 Access 07.09.2021
Greer, Germaine (1970). The Female Eunuch. London: Mac Gibbon & Kee.
İmançer, Dilek (2002). Feminizm ve Yeni Yönelimler. Doğu Batı: Dünya Neyi Tartışıyor?-2-Yeni Düşünce Hareketleri, 19, 151-171.
James, William (1879). Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.
Kayahan, Fatma (1999). Feminizm. İstanbul: BDS.
Kent, Susan Kingsley (1990). Sex and Suffrage in Britain, 1860-1914. London: Routledge.
Laurence, Dan H. (2004). Victorians Unveiled: Some Thoughts on “Mrs. Warren’s Profession”. SHAW The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 24, 38-45. Doi:10.1353/shaw.2004.0012 Access 08.09.2021
Lerner, Laurence (1979). Love and Marriage: Literature in its Social Context. London: Arnold.
Marker, Frederick Jr (1998). “Shaw’s Early Plays.” The Cambridge Companion to George Bernard Shaw C. Innes. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 103-123.
Michel, Andree. (1993). Feminizm. Trans. Şirin Tekeli. İstanbul: İletişim.
Mill, John Stuart (1869). The Subjection of Women. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
Millett, Kate (1970). Sexual Politics. New York: Doubleday and Company.
Mohl, Ruth (1933). The Three Estates in Medieval and Renaissance Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Öğünç, Banu. (2017). From Mrs Warren’s Profession to Press Cuttings: The Woman Question in George Bernard Shaw’s Plays. Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, (37), 55-66. Doi:10.21497/sefad.328244 Access 09.09.2021
Palmer, John (1837, 1910). Records and Chronicles. London: Courtauld.
Peterson, M. Jeanne (1984). No Angels in the House: The Victorian Myth and the Paget Women. The American Historical Review. 89 (3), 677-708.
Purdom, Charles Benjamin (1966). A Guide to the Plays of Bernard Shaw. London: Methuen.
Ramazanoğlu, Caroline (1998). Feminizm ve Ezilmenin Çelişkileri. Trans. Mefkure Bayatlı. İstanbul: Pencere Yayınları.
Reed, John Robert (1975). Victorian Conventions. Ohio: Ohio University Press.
Rich, Adrienne (1995). Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. New York: Norton.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1987). Emile or On Education. Trans. D. Duranby. London: Estetica.
Schott, Robin May (1996). “The Gender of Enlightment.” What is Enlightment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions. Ed. James Schmidt. California: University of California Press. 471-487.
Schreiner, Olive (1911). Women and Labour. London: Fisher Unwin.
Seiz, Janet A. and Pujol, Michèle A. (2000). Harriet Taylor Mill. The American Economic Review, 90 (2), 476-479.
Shaw, George Bernard (1991). Mrs Warren’s Profession. Ed. William-Alan Landes. CA: Players Press.
Showalter, Elaine (1993). Daughters of Decadence: Women Writers of the Fin-de-Siecle. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP.
Taylor Mill, Harriet (1994). “The Enfranchisement of Women.” Sexual Equality: Writings by John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor Mill and Helen Taylor. Ed. Ann P. Robson and John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 178-203.
Tong, Rosemarie (2006). Feminist Düşünce. Trans. Zafer Cirhinlioğlu. İstanbul: Gündoğan.
Walters, Margaret (2005). Feminzim. Trans. Hakan Gür. Ankara: Dost.
Watson, Barbara Bellow (1964). A Shavian Guide to the Intelligent Woman. London: Chatto and Windus.
Wollstonecraft, Mary (1988). A Vindication of the Rights of Women. Ed. Carol H. Poston. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.