GÖRÜŞMECİ VE CEVAPLAYICI ARASINDAKİ UYUMU OLUŞTURAN FAKTÖRLER: TÜRKİYE’DE KADINA YÖNELİK AİLE İÇİ ŞİDDET ARAŞTIRMASINA DAYALI BULGULAR

Görüşme sürecini görüşmeciler ve cevaplayıcılar açısından incelemek, görüşmeciler ve cevaplayıcıların araştırma tahminleri, iletişim ve cevapsızlık gibi konulara olan etkileri nedeniyle oldukça gereklidir. Görüşmeci ve cevaplayıcı arasındaki uyum, cevapların beyan edilmesi ve kalitesinde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Bu nedenle, görüşmeciler ile cevaplayıcılar arasındaki uyumu oluşturan faktörleri görüşmeciler ve cevaplayıcılar açısından ortaya çıkarmaya ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amaçları, görüşmeciler ile cevaplayıcılar arasındaki uyumu oluşturan faktörleri keşfetmek ve görüşmeleri yüksek uyum ile gerçekleşmiş cevaplayıcılar arasındaki farklılıkları göstermektir. Çalışmada, 2014 yılında gerçekleşen Türkiye’de Kadına Yönelik Aile İçi Şiddet Araştırması ve bu araştırmanın Saha Personeli verileri kullanılmaktadır. Bulgular, ziyaretlerin zamanlaması ve sıklığı, görüşmeci özellikleri ve benzerlik ile dinamik görüşme faktörlerinin uyumu oluşmasında önemli kavramlar olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca sonuçlar, görüşmeleri yüksek uyum ile tamamlanmış kadın grupları arasında sosyo-demografik ve sosyo-ekonomik özellikler ile şiddete maruz kalma ve eş tarafından uygulanan kontrol edici davranışlar gibi hassas değişkenlere göre belirgin farklılıklar olduğunu göstermektedir.

EXPLORING FACTORS TO BUILD RAPPORT BETWEEN INTERVIEWER AND RESPONDENT: INSIGHTS FROM THE NATIONAL RESEARCH ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN TURKEY

Examining interviewing process in terms of interviewers and respondents are crucial due to their major roles on survey estimates, cooperation and non-response. The rapport between interviewers and respondents plays a critical role on disclosure of answers and response quality. Therefore, there is a need to unveil factors behind rapport from interviewers’ and respondents’ perspectives. We aim to explore factors to build rapport and investigate variation among subgroups whose interviews conducted with high rapport. This study utilizes the National Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey (2014) data and Field Staff data to achieve objectives. Our findings suggest that timing and frequency of visits, interviewer characteristics and similarity, and dynamic interview factors are essential when building rapport. The study also points out that there are statistically significant variations among women by socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics as well as sensitive variables such as exposure to violence and controlling behaviors by husbands.

PDF

___

Amos, M. (2018). Interviewer Effects on Patterns of Nonresponse: Evaluating the Impact on the Reasons for Contraceptive Nonuse in the Indonesia and the Philippines DHS. Demographic Research, 39, 415-430.
Bell, K., Fahmy, E., & Gordon, D. (2016). Quantitative Conversations: The Importance of Developing Rapport in Standardized Interviewing. Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 193-212.
Belli, R. F., Lepkowski, J. M., & Kabeto, M. U. (2001). The Respective Roles of Cognitive Processing Difficulty and Conversational Rapport on the Accuracy of Retrospective Reports of Doctor’s Office Visits. ML Cynamon and RA Kulka (Eds.), In Seventh Conference on Health Survey Research Methods, (pp. 197-203), Hyattsville, Maryland: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
Berk, M. L., Bernstein, A. B. (1988). Interviewer Characteristics and Performance on a Complex Health Survey. Social Science Research, 17(3), 239-251.
Biemer, P. P., Lyberg, L. E. (2003). Introduction to Survey Quality (Vol. 335). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
Campanelli, P., Sturgis, P., & Purdon, S. (1997). Can You Hear me Knocking? And Investigation into the Impact of Interviewers on Survey Response Rates. London, GB: National Centre for Social Research.
Cappella, J. N. (1990). On Defining Conversational Coordination and Rapport. Psychological Injury, 1(4), 303-305.
Channon, A. A. R., Padmadas, S. S., & McDonald, J. W. (2011). Measuring Birth Weight in Developing Countries: Does the Method of Reporting in Retrospective Surveys Matter? Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(1), 12-18.
Corsi, D. J., Perkins, J. M., & Subramanian S. V. (2017). Child Anthropometry Data Quality from Demographic and Health Surveys, Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys and National Nutrition Surveys in the West Central Africa Region: Are We Comparing Apples and Oranges? Global Health Action, 10(1), 1328185.
Davis, R. E., Couper, M. P., Janz, N. K., Caldwell, C. H., & Resnicow, K. (2009). Interviewer Effects in the Public Health Surveys. Health Education Research, 25(1), 14-26.
Dijkstra, W. (1987). Interviewing Style and Respondent Behavior: An Experimental Study of Survey-Interview. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(2), 309-334.
Drachman, D., de Carufel, A., & Insko, C.A. (1978). The Extra Credit Effect in Interpersonal Attraction.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 458-467.
Durrant, G. B., D’Arrigo, J. (2014). Doorstep Interactions and Interviewer Effects on the Process Leading to Cooperation or Refusal. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(3), 490-518.
Durrant, G. B., Steele, F. (2009). Multilevel Modelling of Refusal and Non-Contact in Household Surveys: Evidence from Six UK Government Surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 172(2), 361-381.
Durrant, G. B., Groves, R. M., Staetsky, L., & Steele, F. (2010). Effects of Interviewer Attitudes and Behaviors on Refusal in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(1), 1-36.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T. (2011). Exploratory Factor Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., Zamarron, M. D., & Ruiz, M. A. (2001). The Contribution of Socio-Demographic Psychosocial Factors to Life Satisfaction. Ageing & Society, 21(1), 25-43.
Flores-Macias, F., Lawson, C. (2008). Effects of Interviewer Gender on, Survey Responses: Findings from a Household Survey in Mexico. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(1), 100-110.
Foucault Welles, B. (2010). Non-Verbal Correlates of Rapport in Face-to-Face Survey Interviews: An Analysis of Interviewer Behavior (p. 291). Presentation at the American Association Public
Opinion Research Conference. Chicago, Illinois. Retrieved from: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/AAPOR2010ConferenceAbstracts.pdf
Foucault, B., Aguilar, J., Miller, P. & Cassell, J. (2013). Behavioral Correlates of Rapport in Survey Interviews. Presentation at the Interviewer-Respondent Interaction Workshop. Boston, MA.
Fowler Jr., F. J., Mangione, T. W. (1990). Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error. (Vol. 18). California: Sage.
Garbarski, D., Schaeffer, N. C., & Dykema, J. (2016). Interviewing Practices, Conversational Practices, and Rapport: Responsiveness and Engagement in the Standardized Survey Interview. Sociological Methodology, 46(1), 1-38.
GDSW, HUIPS. (2015). Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey. Ankara.
Goudy, W. J., Potter, H. R. (1975). Interview Rapport: Demise of Concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(4), 529-543.
Green, M. C., Krosnick, J. A. (2001). Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviewing in Terms of Data Quality: The 1982 National Election Studies Method Comparison Project. Health Survey Research Methods, 115-121.
Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. (1992). Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey, Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(4), 475-495.
Gubrium, J. F., Holstein, J. A., Marvasti, A. B., & McKinney, K. D. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. USA: Sage.
Hair, J. F., Black W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatman, R. L. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (Bol. 5). Prentice hall Upper River, NJ.
Hansen, K. M. (2006). The Effects of Incentivesi Interview Length, and Interviewer Characetristics on Response Rates in a CATI-Study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 112-121.
Hodgetts D., Stolte, O. (2014). Social Distance. In Teo (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, Springer.
Hox, J. J., De Leeuw, E. D., & Kreft, G. G. (1991). The Effect of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on the Quality of Survey Data: A Multilevel Model. In Biemer, Groves, Lyberg, Mathiowetz, and Sudman (Eds.), Measurement Errors in Surveys, (pp.439-461). Wiley & Sons.
Hox, J. J., De Leeuw, E. D., Couper, M. P., Groves, R. M., De Heer, W., & Kuusela, V. (2002). The Influence of Interviewers’ Attitude and Behavior on Household Survey Nonresponse: An International Comparison. Survey Nonresponse, 103-120.
Japec, L. (2008). Interviewer Error and Interviewer Burden. In Lepkowski, Tucker, Brick, De Leeuw, Japec, Lawrakas, Link, Sangster (Eds.), Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, (185-211). Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.
Johnson, K., Grant, M., Khan, S., Moore, Z., & Armstrong, A. (2009). Fieldwork-Related Factors and Data Quality in the Demographic and Health Surveys Program. DHS Analytical Studies No. 19. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro.
Johnson, T. P., Fendrich, M., Shaligram, C., Garcy, A., & Gillespie, S. (2000). An Evaluation of the Effects of Interviewer Characteristics in An RDD Telephone Survey of Drug Use. Journal of Drug Issues, 30(1), 77-101.
Katz, D. (1942). Do Interviewers Bias Poll Results? Public Opinion Quaretrly, 6(2), 248-268.
Lavin, D., & Maynard, D. W. (2001). Standardization vs. Rapport: Respondent Laughter and Interviewer Reaction during Telephone Surveys. American Sociological Review, 453-479.
Lipman-Blumen, J. (1976). Toward a Homosocial Tehory of Sex Roles: An Explanation of the Sex Segregarion of Social Institutions. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1 (3, Part 2), 15-31.
Lipps, O., & Lutz, G. (2010). How Answers on Political Attitudes are Shaped by Interviewers: Evidence from A Panel Survey. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 2, 345-358.
Mensch, B. S., & Kandel, D. B. (1988). Underreporting of Substance Use in A National Longitudinal Youth Cohort: Individual and Interviewer Effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52(1), 100-124.
Olson, K., Bilgen, I. (2011). The Role of Interviewer Experience on Acquiescence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1), 99-114.
Olson, K., Peytchev, A. (2007). Effect of Interviewer Experience on Interview Pace and Interviewer Attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 273-286.
Oyinlade, A. O., Losen, A. (2014). Extraneous Effects of Race, Gender, and Race-Gender Homo and Heterophily Conditions on Data Quality. SAGE Open, 4(1), DOI: 2158244014525418.
Pickery, J., Loosveldt, G., & Carton, A. (2001). The Effects of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Response Behavior in Panel Surveys: A Multilevel Approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(1), 509-523.
Schnell, R., Kreuter, F. (2005). Separating Interviewer and Sampling-Point Effects. Journal of Official Statistics, 21(3), 389-410.
Schober, M. F. (2016). Rapport in Survey Interactions. Sociological Methodology, 46(1), 43-46.
Sheatsley, P. B. (1951). The Art of Interviewing and A Guide to Interviewer Selection and Training. Research Methods in Social Relations, 2.
Singer, E., Frankel M. R., & Glassman, M. B. (1983). The Effect of Interviewer Characteristics and Expectations on Response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 68-83.
Stotland, E., Patchen, M. (1961). Identification and Change in Prejudice and Authoritarianism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 250-256.
Sun, H. (2014). Rapport and Its Impact on the Disclosure of Sensitive Information in Standardized
Interviews (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from: https://isr.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Dissertation_HSun_final2.pdf
Tickle-Degnen, L., Rosenthal, R. (1990). The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 285-293.
Van der Zouwen, J., Dijkstra, W., & Smit, J. H. (2004). Studying Respondent-Interviewer Interaction: The Relationship between Interviewing Style, Interviewer Behavior, and Response Behavior. In Biemer, Groves, Lyberg, Mathiowetz, and Sudman (Eds.), Measurement Errors in Surveys, (419-437). Wiley & Sons.
Vercruyssen, A., Wuyts, C., & Loosveldt, G. (2017). The Effect of Sociodemographic (Mis)Match betweeen Interviewer and Respondents on Unit and Item Nonresponse in Belgium. Social Science Research, 67, 229-238.
Wang, J., Tolson, H., Chiang, T. L., & Huanf, T. Y. (2010). An Exploratory Factor Analysis of Workplace Learning, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment in Small to Midsize Enterprises in Taiwan. Human Resource Development International, 13(2), 147-163.
Weeks, M. F., Moore, R. P. (1981). Ethnicity of Interviewer Effects on Ethic Respondents. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(2), 245-249.
Weiss, C. H. (1968). Validity of Welfare Mothers’ Interview Responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(4), 622-633.
WHO Department of Gender and Women’s Health (2001). Putting Women First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Research on Domestic Violence against Women. Geneva: WHO publications. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/gender/violence/womenfirtseng.pdf
Williams Jr, J. A. (1968). Interviewer Role Performance: A Further Note on Bias in the Information Interview. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(1), 287-294.
Williams Jr, J. A. (1964). Interviewer-Respondent Interaction: A Study of Bias in the Information Interview. Sociometry, 27(3), 338-352.
Yang, M. L., Yu, R. R. (2008). The Interviewer Effect When There is An Education Gap with the Respondent: Evidence from A Survey on Biotechnology in Taiwan. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1321-1331.