The Welfare States and Happiness Inequalities in Europe

The Welfare States and Happiness Inequalities in Europe

Income distribution is a widely used measure of inequality, but in the assessment of welfare it is deemed to be insufficient. When measuring inequality in the distribution of welfare, subjective evaluations such as happiness and life satisfaction should also be taken into account. The purpose of this study was to analyze happiness inequalities in different welfare states in Europe. Overall happiness inequality, as well as happiness inequalities between different socioeconomic groups in these countries , were explored. Furthermore, this study analyzed how these inequalities changed over time. The European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS) data set was used for the analysis. Independent sample t-test and one way ANOVA were also used. All analyses were done using the IBM SPSS 22 program. It was found that social democratic welfare states which consistently rank at the top of happiness rankings had the lowest overall happiness inequalities. Happiness inequalities among different sociodemographic population groups were also low in these countries. On the contrary, post-socialist welfare states had the highest happiness inequalities. Compared to employed people the unemployed were significantly unhappy in corporatist countries. Postsocialist and southern European welfare states stood out as having high happiness inequalities between those with good and poor health and between the young and elderly.

___

  • Ahlquist, J. S., & Breunig, C. (2011). Country clustering in comparative political economy. MPIfG Discussion Paper 09/5. Cologne.
  • Asadullah, M. N., & Chaudhury, N. (2012). Subjective well-being and relative poverty in rural Bangladesh. J. Econ. Psychol., 33, 940–950.
  • Aysan, M. F. (2018). Between Risks and Opportunities: Social Policies in Contemporary Turkey. In B. M. Aysan A., Turkish Economy (pp. 101-120). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  • Aysan, M. F. (2020). Geleceğin Türkiyesinde Sosyal Politikalar. İstanbul: İlke Yayınları.
  • Aysan, M. F., & Aysan, U. (2017). The effect of employment status on life satisfaction in Europe. In D. H. Bilgin M., Empirical Studies on Economics of Innovation, Public Economics and Management. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics (Vol. 6, pp. 335-347). Springer, Cham.
  • Becchetti, L., Massari, R., & Naticcioni, P. (2013). The drivers of happiness inequality: suggestions for promoting social cohesion. Oxford Economic Papers, 66(2), 419-442.
  • Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. (2007). The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice, 130- 3(4), 267-292.
  • Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2000). Well-being Over Time in Britain and the USA. Working Paper 7487. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau for Economic Research,.
  • Bob, D. (2000). Eastern European welfare states: the impact of the politics of globalization. Journal of European Social Policy, 10(2), 146-161.
  • Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness: What government can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Brady, D. (2009). Rich Democracies, Poor People: How Politics Explain Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chen, C. (2001). Aging and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 54(1), 57–79.
  • Clark, A., Flèche, S., & Senik, C. (2012). The great happiness moderation. . SOEP paper No. 468.
  • Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., Layard, R., Powdthavee, N., & Ward, G. (2019). Health of Mind and Body. The Origins of Happiness, 89–104.
  • Clark, A., Fleche, S., & Senik, C. (2016). Economic Growth Evens Out Happiness: Evidence from Six Surveys. The Review of Income and Wealth, 62(3), 405-602. Cunado, J., & Perez de Garcia, F. (2012). Does Education Affect Happiness? Evidence for Spain. Social Indicators Research, 108, 185–196.
  • Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The Eudaimonic and Hedonic Components of Happiness: Qualitative and Quantitative Findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185-207.
  • Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809-827.
  • Diener, E. (2009). Subjective Well-Being. In E. Diener, The Science of Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener; Social Indicators Research Series (Vol. 37, pp. 11-58). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment. 49(1), 71-75. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.
  • Edwards, J. N., & Klemmack, D. L. (1973). Correlates of Life Satisfaction: A Reexamination1. Journal of Gerontology, 28(4), 497–502.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G., & Myles, J. (2012). Economic Inequality and the Welfare State. In The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality.
  • Eurofound. (2013). Quality of life in Europe: Subjective Well-being. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Eurofound. (2014). Developing a country typology for analysing quality of life in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Ferrera, M. (1996). The “Southern” model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17-37.
  • Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U. S. welfare state. Signs, 19(2), 307-336.
  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2010). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton University Press.
  • Gandelman, N., & Porzecanski, R. (2013). Happiness Inequality: How Much is Reasonable? Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 257–269. Gainer, M. (2013). Assessing Happiness Inequality in the Welfare State: Self-Reported
  • Happiness and the Rawlsian Difference Principle. Social Indicators Research(114), 453–464.
  • Goff, L., Helliwell, J. F., & Mayraz, G. (2016). The Welfare Costs of Well-Being Inequality. NBER Working Paper Series. Cambridge: Nationa Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Goodin, R. E., Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Dirven, H.-J. (1999). The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. In The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.
  • Gudmundsdottir, D. G. (2013). The Impact of Economic Crisis on Happiness. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1083-1101.
  • Gurr, T. (1994). Peoples against states: ethnopolitical conflict and the changing world system. International Studies Quarterly, 38, 347–377.
  • Helliwell, J., Layard, F. R., & Sachs, J. D. (2016). World Happiness Report.
  • Helliwell, J., Layard, F. R., & Sachs, J. D. (2018). World Happiness Report.
  • Inglehart, R. (2009). Democracy and happiness: what causes what? . In A. K. Dutt, & B. Radcliff, Happiness, Economics and Politics: Towards a Multi-disciplinary Approach (pp. 256-270). UK,USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Keyes, C. L., & Ed Haidt, J. (2003). Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life welllived. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
  • Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Skytthe, A. (2005). Partner ? children = happiness? The effects of partnerships and fertility on well-being. Population and Development Review, 31, 407–445.
  • Kolosnitsyna, M., Khorkina, N., & Dorzhiev, K. (2014). What happens to happiness when people get older? Socio-economic determinants of life satisfaction in later life.
  • Working Paper. National Research University Higher School of Economics. Kotakorpi, K., & Laamanen, J.-P. (2010). “Welfare state and life satisfaction: Evidence from public health care.” 77.307. Economica, 77(307), 565-583. Kushlev, K., Heintzelman, S. J., Lutes, L. D., Wirtz, D., Kanippayoor, J. M., Leitner, D.,& Diener,
  • E. (2020). Does Happiness Improve Health? Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychological Science, 31(7), 807–821.
  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.
  • Lemieux, P. (2013). American and European Welfare States: Similar Causes, Similar Effects,. Cato Journal, 33(2), 227-232.
  • Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155.
  • Mahler, V., & Jesuit, D. (2006). Fiscal redistribution in the developed countries. SocioEconomic Review, 4, 483-512.
  • Oishi, S. S. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological science, 22(9), 1095-1100.
  • Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2015, AUTUMN). Inequality Hurts Happiness. Warsaw Forum of
  • Economic Sociology 6:2(12) Autumn 2015, 6(2).
  • Ono, H., & Schultz Lee, K. (2013). Welfare States and the Redistribution of Happiness. Social Forces, 92(2), 789–814.
  • Ötker-Robe, I., & Podpiera, A. M. (2013). The social impact of financial crises: evidence from the global financial crisis. World bank.
  • Ott, J. (2005). Level and equality of happiness in nations: Does happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality of happiness? Journal of Happiness Studies, Special
  • Issue on Inequality of Happiness in Nations(6), 397–420. Ovaska, T., & Takashima, R. (2010). Does a Rising Tide Lift All the Boats? Explaining the National Inequality of Happiness. Journal of Economic Issues, 44(1), 205-224.
  • Pacek, A., & Radcliff, B. (2008). Assessing the Welfare State: The Politics of Happiness. Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 267-277.
  • Polese, A., Morris, J., & Kovacs, B. (2015). Introduction: The Failure and Future of the Welfare State in Post-socialism. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 6(1), 1-5.
  • Quick, A. (2015). Inequalities in wellbeing Challenges and opportunities for research and policy. The New Economics Foundation.
  • Rothstein, B. (1998). Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology(52), 141–166.
  • Ryff, C. D., Boylan, J. M., & Kirsch, J. A. (2021). Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being: An integrative perspective with linkages to sociodemographic factors and health. Measuring Well-Being: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Social Sciences and the Humanities, 92–135.
  • Sachweh, P., & Olafsdottir, S. (2012). The welfare state and equality? Stratification realities and aspirations in three welfare regimes. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 149–168.
  • Schröder, M. (2016). Welfare States and their Inequality as a Result of Cultural Differences. In A. Machin, & N. (. Stehr, Understanding Inequality: Social Costs and Benefits (pp. 39-67). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
  • Scruggs, L. A., & Allan, J. P. (2008). Social Stratification and Welfare Regimes for the Twenty-First Century: Revisiting The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. World Politics, 60(4), 642–664.
  • Senik, C. (2008). Ambition and jealousy: income interactions in the “Old” Europe versus the “New” Europe and the United States. Economica, 75, 495–513. Serapioni, M., & Matos, A. R. (2014). Citizen participation and discontent in three Southern European health systems. Social Science & Medicine, 123, 226-233.
  • Spiegel, U. (2008). Income inequality vs . Standard of living inequality. The American Economist, 52(1), 49–57.
  • Stack, S., & Eshleman, R. (1998). Marital Status and Happiness: A 17-Nation Study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 527-536.
  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 39(1), 1-102.
  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Commission on the Measurement of
  • Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris. Stuckler, D., Basu, S., Suhrcke, M., Coutts, A., & McKee, M. (2009). The public health impact of of economic crisis and alternative policy responses in Europe. Lancet, 374(9686), 315-323.
  • Swank, D. (2000). Social Democratic Welfare States in a Global Economy: Scandinavia in Comparative Perspective. In R. Geyer, C. Ingebritsen, & J. Moses, Globalization,
  • Europeanization and the end of Scandinavian social democracy? (pp. 85-138). London: Palgrave Macmillan. The Happiness Research Institute. (2015). Happiness Equality Index Europe 2015.
  • Thelen, K. A. (2014). Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity.
  • Cambridge Studies in Comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tullock, G. (1971). The paradox of revolution. Public Choice, 11, 89–100.
  • Van Hoorn, A., & Maseland, R. (2013). Does a Protestant work ethic exist? Evidence from the well-being effect of unemployment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 91, 1-12. Vanassche, S., Swicegood, G., & Matthijs, K. (2013). Marriage and children as a key to happiness? Cross-national differences in the effects of marital status and children on well-being. , 14(2), . Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 501-524.
  • Veenhoven, R. (2000). Well‐being in the welfare state: Level not higher, distribution not more equitable. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 2(1), 91-125.
  • Veenhoven, R. (2014). Livability theory. In A. C. Michalos, Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 3645-3647). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The Cross-National Pattern of Happiness: Test of Predictions Implied in Three Theories of Happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34(1), 33-68.
  • Veenhoven, R., & Kalmijin, W. (2005). Inequality-adjusted happiness in nations: Egalitarianism and utilitarianism married in a new index of societal performance. Journal of Happiness Studies Special Issue on ’Inequality of Happiness in nations’, 6, 421–445.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.
  • Yong, E. (2019). Unemployment and the European Union, 2000–2017: structural exploration of distant past economic experience and future prosperity. Economic Structures, 8(30)