Varol DUR

24147

Türkiye'de Kadın İstihdamı ve Aile: Algılar ve Teori Arasında Bir Karşılaştırma

Türk refah rejiminin, hangi refah modelinin içindeyer aldığına ilişkin literatürde farklı yaklaşımlarmevcuttur. Bununla beraber, özellikle kadın veailenin konumu dikkate alındığında Türkiye’ninGüney Avrupa Refah Modelinin (GARM)belirleyici niteliklerini taşıdığı göze çarpmaktadır.Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin GARM dahil olduğugörüşünden yola çıkarak belirlenen çerçevede biranket hazırlanmıştır. Hazırlanan anket, literatürdekabul edilen GARM' özellikleriyle, Türkvatandaşlarının refah devletine dönük algısınınuyumu test edilmiştir. Anket sonuçları çapraztablolar ve regresyon analizi kullanılarakdeğerlendirilmiştir. Neticede, tek gelir getiricili –çift gelir getiricili aile yapısı ve kadın çalışmasınabakış açısı noktasında literatüre uymayan cevaplaralınırken, ani krizlere kime güvenileceği ve en çokgüvenilen sigorta kolu hususlarında uyumluyanıtlar alınmıştır. Literatürde tek gelir getiriciliaileden çift gelir getiricili aileye geçişin hem işgücüpiyasası, hem de aile yapısı üzerindeki büyüketkisine yapılan yaygın vurgu nedeniyle bağımlıdeğişken olarak seçilmiştir. Analiz neticesinde,bağımlı değişkenin en önemli tahmin edicisinin dekadının çalışmasına dönük algı olduğu tespitedilmiş, toplumsal bir dönüşüm yaşandığı ortayakonmuştur.  
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Türk refah devleti, aile, kadın istihdamı, güney avrupa refah modeli, regresyon analizi

Women Employment and Family in Turkey: A Comparison between Perceptions and the Theory

There are different approaches about where Turkishwelfare regime should be placed among welfaremodels in the relevant literature. That being said,especially when taking women's and family’sposition into consideration, Turkey shows similartendencies with South European Welfare Regimes’(SEWR) characteristics. In this paper, aquestionnaire has been developed within the scopeof a framework that is based on the literature onTurkey’s membership to SEWR. The questionnaireaims to test compatibility between SEWRcharacteristics put forwardin the related literatureand Turkish citizens’ perception about welfarestate. Cross-tabulation and regression analysis wereused to evaluate results of the questionnaire.Theresults of the analyses show that, while theresponds about perception on sole breadwinner –dual breadwinner and, perception on womenemployment were not compatible with theliterature, perception on who can be trusted in caseof urgent crisis and, perception on the mostimportant insurance branch were in parallel withthe literature. Since the transformation from solebreadwinner to dual breadwinner has seriouseffects on both labour market and family structure,it was chosen as dependent variable for regressionanalysis. The analysis indicated that perceptionabout women employment is the most powerfulpredictor of the dependent variable.  
Keywords:

Turkish welfare state, south europe welfare regime, family, women employment, regression analysis,

PDF

___

  • Andreotti A.; Garcia, Soledad M., A. Gomez, P. Hespanha, Y. Kazepo ve E. Mingione (2010), “Does a Southern European Model Exist?”, Journal of European Area Studies, Volume 9:1.
  • Arts, W. A. and J. Gelissen (2010), "Models of the Welfare State", Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Aybars, A. and T. Dimitris (2010), “Straddling Two Continents: Social Policy and Welfare Politics in Turkey”, Social Policy & Administration, 44.6, 746-763.
  • Bambra, C. (2004), “The Worlds of Welfare: Illusory and Gender Blind?”, Social Policy & Society, 3:3, 201-211.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Ferrera, M. (1996), “The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol.6(1).
  • Gal, J. (2010), “Is There an Extended Family of Mediterranean Welfare States?”, Journal of European Social Policy, Oct 2010, Vol.20.4.
  • Grütjen, D. (2008), The Turkish Welfare Regime: An Example of the Southern European Model? The Role of the State, Market and Family in Welfare Provision, Turkish Policy Quarterly, 7.1, 111-129.
  • Hudson, J. and S. Kühner (2012), “Analyzing the Productive and Protective Dimensions of Welfare: Looking Beyond the OECD”, Social Policy & Administration, Volume 46.1, 35-60. Huizingh, E. (2007), Applied statistics with SPSS, Sage.
  • ILO (2014), “Informality and the Quality of Employment in G20 Countries”, [http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2014/ILOinformality.pdf], (20.03.2017).
  • Karamessini, M. (2007), The Southern European Social Model: Changes and Continuities in Recent Decades, International Institute for Labour Studies, [http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public /---dgreports/--inst/documents/publication/ wcms_193518.pdf], (20.01.2017).
  • Karamessini M. (2008), “Continuity and Change in the Southern European Social Model” International Labour Review, Vol. 147, No. 1.
  • Ki-tae, K. (2015), “From Worlds to Cases: Case Selection and ‘Other Worlds’ in the Welfare Modelling Business”, Social Policy and Society, 14.02, 309-321.
  • Klose, P. and J. Moreno-Fuentes Francisco (2013), “The Southern European Welfare Model in the Post-Industrial Order”, European Societies, Volume 15:4.
  • Leon M. (2002), “Towards the Individualization of Social Rights: Hidden Familialistic Practices in Spanish Social Policy”, South European Society and Politics, 7:3.
  • Menard, S. (2002), Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, No. 106, Sage. Menard, S. (2011), Logistic Regression: From Introductory to Advanced Concepts and Application, Sage.
  • Mínguez, M. (2008), “Welfare State, Familistic Culture and Women’s Employment in the Southern European Countries: The Key Issues to Activate Women’s Employment”, International Conference, May 15th-16th, 2008
  • Nuremberg, Germany, [http://doku.iab.de/ veranstaltungen/2008/activation_2008_mi nguez.pdf], (19.01.2017).
  • Moreno, L. and P. Marí-Klose (2013), “Youth, Family Change and Welfare Arrangements: Is the South Still So Different?”, European Societies, 15.4, 493-513.Women Employment and Family in Turkey: A Comparison between Perceptions and the Theory 257
  • Moreno, L. (2006), “The Model of Social Protection in Southern Europe: Enduring Characteristics?”, Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, 2006/5 (n° 5).
  • Nisanci, Azize Aslihan (2016), "Continuity or Shift: A Multiple Streams Framework Analysis of the Family Policy in Turkey", J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare 43, 19-36.
  • Osborne, J. W. (2014), Best Practices in Logistic Regression, SAGE Publications. Papadopoulos T. ve A. Roumpakis (2013), “Familistic Welfare Capitalism in Crisis: Social Reproduction and Anti-Social Policy in Greece”, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 29:3, 204- 224.
  • Peng, C.; Kuk L. and M. Gary (2002), An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting, The Journal of Educational Research, 96.1, 3-14.
  • Scruggs, L. A. and J. P. Allan (2008), “Social Stratification and Welfare Regimes for the Twenty-First Century”, Revisiting the Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, World Politics, Volume 60, Number 4.
  • Sharkh, M. and I. Gough (2010), "Global Welfare Regimes a Cluster Analysis" Global Social Policy, 10.1, 27-58.
  • Taşçı, F. (2013), “Refah Devleti Modelleri İçinde Türkiye’nin Pozisyonu: ‘Yaşlı Algısı’ Üzerinden Değerlendirmeler”, İnsan & Toplum Dergisi, 3.5, 5-35.
  • Tavora I. (2012), “The Southern European Social Model: Familialism and the High Rates of Female Employment in Portugal”, Journal of European Social Policy, 22(1).
  • Turğut, Faruk (2016), “Türk Siyasetinde Son Dönem Aile Politikaları”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, (35), 411-426.
  • The Research Advisors (2006), [http://research-advisors.com/tools/Sample Size.htm], (19.03.2017)
  • Ulutaş, Çağla (2015), “İş ve Aile Yaşamını Uzlaştırma Politikaları: Türkiye'de Yeni Politika Arayışları”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 70.3: 723-750.
  • Wood, G. ve I. Gough (2006), “A Comparative Welfare Regime Approach to Global Social Policy”, World Development, 34(10), 1696-1712.
  • Yazıcıoğlu, Y. ve S. Erdoğan (2004), Spss Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara, Detay Yayıncılık.
SOSYAL GÜVENLİK DERGİSİ-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-4839
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: SOSYAL GÜVENLİK KURUMU
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Türkiye'de Otel İşletmelerindeki Beceri Açığı Sorunu: Kocaeli, Sakarya, İstanbul İllerinde Bir Araştırma

Emel İslamoğlu, Sinem Yıldırımalp, Erdem Cam

Türkiye'de Kadın İstihdamı ve Aile: Algılar ve Teori Arasında Bir Karşılaştırma

Varol DUR