Dışlama Yöntemi ve Türkiye’de Çekirdek Enflasyon

Ülkemizde Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK) tarafından oluşturulan bir komisyon tarafından yedi adet çekirdek enflasyon ölçüsü belirlenmiştir. Bu ölçüler dışlama yöntemiyle elde edilmiştir. Dışlama yöntemi politika karar vericiler tarafından oldukça sık kullanılmakta, ancak ampirik çalışmalarda alternatif ölçülere göre başarısız bulunmaktadır. Enflasyon hedeflemesi çerçevesinde çekirdek enflasyon ölçüsünün bazı özellikler taşıması gerekmektedir. Çalışmada, TÜİK çekirdek enflasyon ölçülerinin bu özellikleri yerine getirip getirmediği ve genel olarak dışlama yönteminin olumlu ve olumsuz yönleri tartışılmıştır

In our country, it is determined seven core inflation indicators by a committe which is constructed by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). These indicators are constructed by excluding approach. This approach is used by policy decision makers quite often, but found less reliable than alternative measures in amprical research. In the perspective of inflation targetting, core inflation must have some criteria. In this study, it is debated advantage and disadvantage of exluding approach and if TURKSTAT’s core measures have these criteria

___

  • Berkmen P. (2002), “Measuring Core Inflation for Turkey”, Central Bank Republic of Turkey Review, vol. 2, no. 2, July.
  • Blinder A. S. (1997), “Commentary”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Luis Review, May/June.
  • Cecchettı S. (1997), “Measuring Short Run Inflation for Central, Bankers” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Luis Review, (May/june), 143-155
  • Ceylan S. (2005), “Çekirdek Enflasyon: Kavram, Literatür ve Uygulama”, KTU- Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İktisat ABD. Doktora Tezi, Şubat.
  • Cockerell L. (1999), “Measures of Inflation and Inflation Targeting in Australia”, Meeting of Central Bank Model Builders, Bank of International Settlements, Conference, 18-19 February.
  • Cutler J. (2001), “Core Inflation in the UK”, http://www.bankofengland. co.uk /pc/ extmpcpaper0003.pdf.
  • Figueiredo F. M. R.ve Staub R.B.(2002), “Evaluating and Combination of Core Inflation Measures for Brazil”, www.cemla.org/pdf/red/BR_Rodrigues _Blass.pdf.
  • Freman D. (1998), “Do Core Inflation Measure Help Forecast Inflation?”, Economic Letters, 58, s.143-147.
  • Hahn E. (2001), “Core Inflation in the Euro Area: Evidence from the Structural VAR Aproach”, http://www.ifk.cfs.de/papers/01-09.pdf.
  • Jaramillo C. F. (1998), “Improving the Measurement of Core Inflation in Colombia: Using Asymetric Trimmed Means”,www.banrep.gov.co /docum/ftp/borra091.pdf.
  • Marqoues C.R., Neves P.D. ve Sarmento L. M. (2002a), “Evaluating Core. Inflation Indicators”, Economic Modelling.
  • Marques C. R, Neves P. D. ve De Silva A. G. (2002b), “Why Should Central Bank Avoid the Use of the Underlying Inflation Indicator”, Economic Letters, 75.
  • Mishkin F. S. ve Posen A. S. (1997), “Inflation Targetting: Lessons from four Cauntries”, Federal Reserve Bank of Newyork Economic Policy Review, 1997.
  • Moron E.ve Zegrra L. F. (1999), “Predictability of Competing Measure of Core Inflation: An Application of Peru”, www.dii.vchile.cl/~lcea99/papers/ 247.pdf.
  • Roger S. (1994), “Alternative Measure of Underlying Inflation”, Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, vol. 57, no. 2.
  • Roger S. (1997), “A Robust Measure of Core Inflation in New Zealand”, www4.statcan.ca/secure/english/ottawagroup/pdf/04R063.pdf.
  • Roger S. (1998), “Core Inflation: Concept, Uses and Measurements”, Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper Series G98/9.
  • Sakarya B, Yurtoğlu H. ve Duvan B. (1999), “A Cointegration Analyses of. Alternative Core Inflation Measures for Turkey”, DPT Working Papers.
  • Telatar E. (2002), “Çekirdek Enflasyon: Tanım ve Ölçüm Yöntemleri”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 42-43.
  • Vega J. L. ve Wynne M. A. (2001), “An Evaluation of Some Measures of Core Inflation for the Euro Area”, European Central Bank Working Paper Series, no.53.