Sigorta Hasar Verilerine Eğri Normal Dağılımın Uygulanması

Çok sayıda küçük ve az sayıda büyük kayıpları içeren sigortacılık verileri genellikle normal dağılım sergilememektedir. Bu çalışmada, sigorta hasar verilerine eğri normal ve diğer parametrik dağılımlar uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca uygunluk ölçüleri ile bazı kuyruk riski ölçüleri de çalışmada verilmiştir. Sonuçlar eğri normal dağılımların diğer parametrik yöntemlere göre daha iyi sonuçlar verdiğini göstermiştir. Ayrıca elde edilen sonuçlar literatürdeki diğer sigorta verileri üzerine yapılan çalışmalarla da tutarlıdır.

Skewed Distributions for Fitting Insurance Claims

Insurance data, which includes a large number of small losses and a lower number of very large losses, is generally non-normally distributed. In this paper, we apply skewed distributions and other parametric distributions to our data. In addition to goodness of fit tests we also provide tail risk measures. The results represent that skewed distributions perform better than the other models. Our results are consistent with the related papers which use different insurance data sets in the literature.

___

  • Abbasi, B. & Guillen, M. (2013). Bootstrap control charts in monitoring value at risk in insurance. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(15), 6125-6135.
  • Adcock, C., Eling, M. & Loperfido, N. (2012). Skewed distributions in finance and actuarial science: a review. The European Journal of Finance, 1-29.
  • Alemany, R., Bolancé, C. & Guillén, M. (2013). A nonparametric approach to calculating value-at-risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52(2), 255-262.
  • Artzner, P. (1999). Application of coherent risk measures to capital requirements in insurance. North American Actuarial Journal, 3(2), 11-25.
  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203-228.
  • Azzalini, A. (1985), A class of distributions which includes the normal ones, Scand. J. Statistic 12, 171-178
  • Azzalini, A. & Capitanio, A. (1999), Statistical applications of the multivariate skew-normal distribution, J.Roy. Stattist.. Soc. B 61, 579-602
  • Azzalini, A. & Capitanio, A. (2003), Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate Skewed t distribution, J.Roy. Statist. Soc. B 65, 367-389
  • Bernardi M., Maruotti A., Petrella L. (2012), Skew mixture models for loss distributions: A bayesian approach, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 51, 617-623.
  • Bolance C., Guillen M., Pelican E. & Vernic R. (2008). Skewed bivariate models and nonparametric estimation for the CTE risk measure. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43(3), 386-393.
  • Çuhacı, Y. K. (2004). Açıklamalı Sigorta ve Reasürans Terimleri Sözlüğü, Milli Reasürans T.A.Ş., İstanbul, s.148.
  • Dowd K. & Blake D.(2006), After VaR: The Theory, Estimation, and Insurance Applications of Quantile-Based Risk measures, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(2), 193-229.
  • Eling, M. (2012). Fitting insurance claims to skewed distributions: Are the skew-normal and skew-student good models? Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 51(2), 239-248.
  • Figueiredo F. & Gomes M.I. (2013), The Skew-Normal Distribution in SPC. REVSTAT Statistical Journal, 11(1), 83-104.
  • Gao, F. & Wang, S. (2011). Asymptotic behavior of the empirical conditional value-at- risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 49(3), 345-352.
  • Jarque, C.M. & Bera, A. K. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review, 55, 163-172.
  • Kaye, P. (2005). Risk Measurement in Insurance A Guide To Risk Measurement, Capital Allocation And Related Decision Support Issues. Casualty Actuarial Society Discussion Paper.
  • Klugman, S. A., Panjer, H. H., & Willmot, G. E. (2012). Loss models: from data to decisions (Vol. 715). John Wiley & Sons.
  • McNeil, A. J., Frey, R. & Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools. Princeton University Press.
  • Ufer, W. (1996). The «Value at Risk» concept for insurance companies. In Contribution to the 6 th AFIR International Colloquium, Nurnberg.
  • Uryasev, S. (2000). Conditional Value-at-Risk: Optimization algorithms and applications. In Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering, 2000.(CIFEr) Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE/INFORMS 2000 Conference on (pp. 49-57). IEEE.
  • Vernic, R. (2006). Multivariate Skew Normal Distributions with Applications in Insurance. Insurance: Mathematic and Economics, 38, 413-426
  • Wang, C. P., Shyu, D., Huang, H. H. (2005). Optimal insurance design under a value-at-risk framework. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 30(2), 161-179.