Serhat KOLOGLUGİL

4954

Knowledge Economy and the Emergence of Less-hierarchical Organizational Structures: An Institutionalist Approach

Recent years have witnessed the proliferation of horizontal and less-hierarchical governance structures in organizations. The present paper argues that this development can be read as an institutional transition, within organizations themselves, in response to the rise of knowledge economy. Drawing also upon the related literature on hunter and gatherers, the paper shows that asset-based production is generally related with hierarchical social relations, whereas knowledge-based economic activity tends to generate relatively horizontal and egalitarian structures. It is argued in the paper that a similar dynamic is at work in today’s knowledge-based organizations, and that the institutional approach has the conceptual tools to study this transformation. In this regard, the paper aims to open up a theoretical space where the tools of institutional theory can be used, not only in the study of macro social-structures, but also in that of organizations and their transformations. Some further theoretical and practical implications of this approach are discussed in the final section.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

knowledge economy, technology, organizations, less-hierarchical structures

PDF

___

  • Adkisson, Richard V. (2004). “Ceremonialism, Intellectual Property Rights, and Innovative Activity”, Journal of Economic Issues, 38(2), 459-466.
  • Adler, Paul S. (2001). “Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism”, Organization Science, 12(2), 215-234.
  • Anderson, Philip (1999). “Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science”, Organization Science, 10(3), 216-232.
  • Baker, Wayne (1992). “The Network Organization in Theory and Practice”, In N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Bannon, S., K. Ford, and L. Meltzer (2011). “Understanding Millennials in the Workplace”, The CPA Journal, 81(11), 61.
  • Bartlett, C. and S. Ghoshal (1993). “Beyond the M-form: Toward a managerial theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 23–46.
  • Blackler, F., M. Reed and A. Whitaker (1993). “Editorial Introduction: Knowledge Workers and Contemporary Organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 851-862.
  • Blau, P. M. and W. R. Scott (2003). Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach. Stanford University Press.
  • Burkhardt, M. E. and D. J. Brass (1990). “Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The Effects of a Change in Technology on Social Network Structure and Power”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 104-127.
  • Carson, J. B., P. E. Tesluk and J. A. Marrone (2007). “Shared Leadership in Teams: An Investigation of Antecedent Conditions and Performance", Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1937). “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
  • Day, D. V., P. Gronn and E. Salas (2006). “Leadership in Team-based Organizations: On the Threshold of a New Era”, The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 211-216.
  • Drucker, Peter F. (1988). “The Coming of the New Organization”, Harvard Business Review, January-February 1988, 3-11.
  • Edgell, Stephen. (1975). “Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of Evolutionary Change”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 34(3), 267-280.
  • Ezzamel, M., S. Lilleys and H. Willmot (1994). “The New Organisation and the New Managerial Work”, European Management Journal, 12, 454–461.
  • Fenwick, M. and E. P. Vermeulen (2019). “Technology and Corporate Governance: Blockchain, Crypto, and Artificial Intelligence”, Texas Journal of Business Law, 48, 1.
  • Friesen, J. P., A. C. Kay, R. P. Eibach, and A. D. Galinsky (2014). “Seeking Structure in Social Organization: Compensatory Control and the Psychological Advantages of Hierarchy", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 590.
  • Geisinger, Kurt F. (2016). “21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess Them?”, Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245-249.
  • Hayek, Friedrich A. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1, Rules and Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hill, S., R. Martin and M. Harris (2000). “Decentralization, Integration and the Post‐bureaucratic Organization: The Case of R&D”, Journal of Management Studies, 37(4), 563-586.
  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1992). “Thorstein Veblen and Post-Darwinian Economics”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16(3), 285-301.
  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1998). “On the Evolution of Thorstein Veblen’s Evolutionary Economics”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(4), 415-431.
  • Kaplan, H. S., P. L. Hooper and M. Gurven (2009). “The Evolutionary and Ecological Roots of Human Social Organization”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1533), 3289-3299.
  • Kologlugil, Serhat (2012). “Free Software, Business Capital, and Institutional Change: A Veblenian Analysis of the Software Industry”, Journal of Economic Issues, 46(4), 831-858.
  • Landes, David S. (1986). “What do Bosses really do?”, The Journal of Economic History, 46(3), 585-623.
  • Langlois, R.N. and G.M. Hodgson (1992). “Orders and Organizations: Toward an Austrian Theory of Social Institutions”, In: Caldwell, B., Boehm, S. (Eds.), Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 165–183.
  • Lee, M. Y., and A. C. Edmondson (2017). “Self-Managing Organizations: Exploring the Limits of Less-hierarchical Organizing", Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 35-58.
  • Lower, Milton D. (1987). “The Concept of Technology within the Institutionalist Perspective”, Journal of Economic Issues, 21(3), 1147-1176.
  • Lumineau, F., W. Wang and O. Schilke (2021). “Blockchain Governance—A New Way of Organizing Collaborations?”. Organization Science, 32(2), 500-521.
  • Magee, J. C. and A. D. Galinsky (2008). “Social Hierarchy: The Self-reinforcing Nature of Power and Status”, Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351-398.
  • Manz, C. C. and H. P. Sims, Jr. (1987). Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-managing Work Teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 106-129.
  • Menger, Carl. 1963 [1883]. Problems of Economics and Sociology. Trans. F. J. Nock. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Mohrman, S. A., S. G. Cohen and A. M. Morhman, Jr. (1995). Designing Team-based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work. Jossey-Bass.
  • Ng, E. S., L. Schweitzer and S. T. Lyons (2010). “New Generation, Great Expectations: A Field Study of the Millennial Generation”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281-292.
  • Pearce, C. L. and J. A. Conger (2002). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Sage Publications.
  • Pierce, B. D. and R. White (1999). “The Evolution of Social Structure: Why Biology Matters”, Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 843-853.
  • Plowman, D. A., S. Solansky, T. E. Beck, L. Baker, M. Kulkarni and D. V. Travis (2007). “The Role of Leadership in Emergent, Self-organization”, The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 341-356.
  • Ruigrok, W. and L. Achtenhagen (1999). “Organizational Culture and the Transformation towards New Forms of Organizing”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(4), 521-536.
  • Rutherford, Malcolm. (1984). “Thorstein Veblen and the Process of Institutional Change”, History of Political Economy, 16(3), 331-348.
  • Rutherford, Malcolm (1998). “Veblen’s Evolutionary Programme: A Promise Unfulfilled”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(4) 463-477.
  • Salas, E., C. S. Burke and J. A. Cannon‐Bowers (2000). “Teamwork: Emerging Principles”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(4), 339-356.
  • Stacey, Ralph D. (1995). “The Science of Complexity: An Alternative Perspective for Strategic Change Processes”, Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 477-495.
  • Turco, Catherine (2016). The Conversational Firm: Rethinking Bureaucracy in the Age of Social Media. Columbia University Press.
  • Veblen, Thorstein [1914] 1918. The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts. New York: B. W. Huebsch.
  • Veblen, Thorstein [1899] 1994. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Dover Publications.
  • Veblen, Thorstein [1921] 2001. The Engineers and the Price System. Kitchener, Canada: Batoche Books.
  • Vergne, Jean-Philippe (2020). “Decentralized vs. Distributed Organization: Blockchain, Machine Learning and the Future of the Digital Platform”, Organization Theory, 1(4): 1–26.
  • Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber. Trans. H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills. New York: Oxford University Press. Woodburn, James. (1982). “Egalitarian Societies”, Man, 17(3), 431-451.
  • Wynen, J., K. Verhoest and K. Rübecksen (2014). “Decentralization in Public Sector Organizations: Do Organizational Autonomy and Rsult Control Lead to Decentralization Toward Lower Hierarchical Levels?”, Public Performance & Management Review, 37(3), 496-520.
Social Review of Technology and Change-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2022
  • Yayıncı: Işık Üniversitesi Yayınları
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Şirketlerin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği İlkelerine Bağlılık Beyanları ile Uygulamaların Beyanlarla Uyumu

Sinem ZEYBEK ARSLANBOĞA, Yeşim Pınar SOYKUT SARICA

Müzik Endüstrisinin Dijitalleşmesi ve McDonaldlaştırılmış Bir Platform Olarak Spotify

Kaan TAŞBAŞI

Gelişen Teknolojiler ve Uluslararası Güvenlik: Makineler, Devlet ve Savaş

İlgi Doğa ALBASAR

Knowledge Economy and the Emergence of Less-hierarchical Organizational Structures: An Institutionalist Approach

Serhat KOLOGLUGİL

A Review of LIWC and Machine Learning Approaches On Mental Health Diagnosis

Bahar SERT, Selami Varol ÜLKER

Savaşın Yeni Araçları: Silahlı İnsansız Hava Araçlarının (SiHA) Yayılması ve Büyük Güçlerden Devlet Dışı Aktörlere SİHA Kullanımı

Mehmet Turan ÇAĞLAR, Lara GÜLMEZ