ANALYSIS THE GEOMATICS DISCIPLINE IN TURKEY

The trained labour force in the Geomatics sector includes graduates from institutions providing secondary school, undergraduate, graduate and post graduate education and are developing rapidly. Most of the schools are state schools that contribute human resources to the sector. However, the presence of the private sector in this field has remained very limited. Studies are being conducted by professional non-governmental organizations, leading with the Geomatics and Cadastre Engineers Association and also by other prominent associations and foundations. Moreover, these non-governmental organizations, working in an international context, contribute to the efforts to further institutionalize the professional and organizational structure. A body structured to cover all institutions providing education in the profession and also all civil society representatives hasn’t yet been established. The need stands out in particular for a civil society umbrella organization that includes graduates of educational institutions at different professional levels.

___

  • [1] Atasoy, V., (2011). Vocatıonal Educatıon, Vocatıonal School, IKMEP, Surveyıng, TMMOB Chamber of Surveying and Cadastre Engineers 13. Scientific and Technical Conference of Turkey, Ankara
  • [2] Çetinsaya G., (2014), Growth, Qualıty, Internationalization: A Road Map for Hıgher Edcaiton for Turkey, Ankara.
  • [3] Çoruhlu Y.E., (2016). Registration of foundation properties – cultural asset on behalf of their own fused foundations, Survey Review, vol.48, pp.110-120.
  • [4] Çoruhlu Y.E., Demir O., (2015), Institutional and occupational development of foundations (GDF) and its experts on land market: A case study in Turkey, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, vol.24, pp.695-706.
  • [5] Çoruhlu Y.E., and Uzun B. (2018), Investıgatıon The Accredıtatıon Process and Development an Object-Orıented Database: Case Study for Department of Geomatıcs Engıneerıng, Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 36(4), 1097-1124.
  • [6] Demir O., Uzun B., Cete M., (2008), Turkish Cadastral System, Survey Review, vol.40, pp.54-66.
  • [7] Demir O., Uzun B., Çoruhlu Y.E., (2015), Progress Of Cost Recovery On Cadastre Based On Land Management Implementation In Turkey, Survey Review, vol.47, pp.36-48.
  • [8] Eğitim-Bir-Sen, (2017), Overvıew of Hıgher Educatıon 2017 Monıtorıng and Evaluatıon Report, Ankara.
  • [9] Gong, J., Yue, P., Woldai, T., Tsai, F., Vyas, A., Wu, H., ... & Musikhin, I. (2017). Geoinformatics education and outreach: looking forward. Geo-spatial information science, 20(2), 209-217.
  • [10] Keating, J., Medrich, E., Volkoff, V. and Perry, J., 2002. Comparative Study of Vocational Education and Training Systems. NCVER. Kensington Park: Australia.
  • [11] Koehn, E. E. (1997). Engineering perceptions of ABET accreditation criteria. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 123(2), 66-70.
  • [12] Konecny G. (2002), Recent Global Changes in Geomatics Education, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXIV, Part p, Commission VI, Symposium, September, Sao Jose’dos Campos-Brazil.
  • [13] Köktürk, E., Çelik R. N., Özlüdemir M. T., Kılıç G., (2005), The Scale of Educatıon and Traınıng Problems in Surveyıng Sector, TMMOB Chamber of Surveying and Cadastre Engineers 10. Scientific and Technical Conference of Turkey, Ankara
  • [14] Lee, L. S., Ko, H. M., & Wang, M. T. (2017). Quality of Accreditation Services for Engineering Programs. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(4), 1335-1344.
  • [15] Morkoç, D. ve Doğan, M., 2014. Vıews of Employees Who Are Graduated from Vocatıonal School to Vocatıonal Traınıng: Case of Canakkale Onsekız Mart Unıversıty. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, 4(4).
  • [16] Oakes, T. J., (1999). A Guide to Organizations İnvolved with Licensing and Certification of Teachers and Accreditation of Teacher Education Programs. ERIC Number: ED437367
  • [17] OECD (2017), Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • [18] Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., & Lattuca, L. R. (2005). Quality assurance of engineering education through accreditation: The impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and its global influence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 165-184.
  • [19] Teo, T. A., Wu, H. M., Shih, T. Y., & Tsai, F. (2014). The analysis of smartphone apps in geomatics education. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40(6), 93.
  • [20] Turhan, Cigdem, Gokhan Sengul, and Murat Koyuncu. (2015). A Comprehensive Assessment Plan for Accreditation in Engineering Education: A Case Study in Turkey. International Journal of Engineering Education 31.5 (2015): 1270-1281.
  • [21] Uçar, C., ve Özerbaş, M. A., 2013. The Posıtıon of Vocatıonal Educatıon and Traınıng in The World and in Turkey, Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(2), 242-253.
  • [22] URL-1: https://www.myk.gov.tr/index.php/tr/avrupa-yeterlilikler-cercevesi (Access: 03.03.2020)
  • [23] URL-2: http://www.mudek.org.tr (Access: 03.03.2020)
  • [24] URL-3: http://www.abet.org/ (Access: 03.03.2020)
  • [25] URL-4; http://www.yok.gov.tr/web/guest/tarihce (Access: 27.11.2018)
  • [26] URL-5; http://yokak.gov.tr/hakkinda (Access: 03.03. 2020)
  • [27] URL-6: https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=10816 (Access: 17.10. 2019)
  • [28] URL-7: http://www.fig.net/about/index.asp (Access: 04.12. 2018)
  • [29] URL-8: https://slideplayer.biz.tr/slide/2848376/ (Access: 03.03.2020)
  • [30] Uslu, A., Kızıloğlu, K., İşleyen, S. K., & Kahya, E. (2017). Geographic information system-based AHPTOPSIS approach for school site selection: A case study for Ankara. Journal of Polytechnıc, 20(4), 933-943.
  • [31] Uyan, M. 2014. MSW landfill site selection by combining AHP with GIS for Konya, Turkey, Environmental Earth Sciences 71(4): 1629-1639.
  • [32] Uyan, M. (2017). Optimal site selection for solar power plants using multi-criteria evaluation: A case study from the Ayranci region in Karaman, Turkey. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(9), 2231-2244.
  • [33] Uzun B., (2009), Using Land Readjustment Method As An Effective Urban Land Development Tool In Turkey, Survey Review, vol.41, pp.57-70.
  • [34] Uzun B., Çelik Şimşek N., (2015), Upgrading of illegal settlements in Turkey; the case of North Ankara Entrance Urban Regeneration Project, Habitat International, vol.49, pp.157-164.
  • [35] Yildiz O., Çoruhlu Y.E., Demir O., (2015), A Visional Overvıew to Renovation Concept on Cadastral Works in Turkey), Sigma Journal Of Engıneerıng And Natural Sciences-Sigma Muhendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.33, pp.503-519.
  • [36] Yildiz O., Çoruhlu Y.E., (2017), The Turkish Surveying Private Sector, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, Vol. 26 , No. 12A/2017, Pages.8008-8022.
  • [37] Yildiz, M. S., Arslan H. M., (2015). Applıcatıon of Fuzzy Topsıs Method on Locatıon Selectıon of Educatıonal Facılıtıes: A Locatıon Analysıs in Düzce. Journal of International Social Research, 8(36).
  • [38] Yildirim, V. 2012. Application of raster-based GIS techniques in the siting of landfills in Trabzon Province, Turkey: A case study, Waste Management & Research 30(9): 949-960.
  • [39] Yildirim, V., Memisoglu, T., Bediroglu, S., & Colak, H. E. (2018). Municipal solid waste landfill site selection using Multi-Criteria Decision Making and GIS: case study of Bursa province. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 26(2), 107-119.
  • [40] Yue, P., R. Ramachandran, P. Baumann, S. Khalsa, M. Deng, and L. Jiang. 2016. Recent Activities in Earth Data Science. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine 4 (4): 84–89.