Reha Atakan ÇETİN, Sefa ÇETİN, Erol TURAN

Sosyal Güven, Otoriterlik ve Göçmenlere Yönelik Tutum

Son yıllarda, göç konusu, pek çok araştırmacı tarafından önemli bir sorun olarak kabul edilmiş; konu akademik olarak da gittikçe daha fazla dikkat çekmeye başlamıştır. Buna göre, ilgili alanda çalışan araştırmacılar, göçmen nüfusun çoğunluğunu alan ülkelerdeki artan göçmen karşıtı tutumların ana dinamiklerini belirlemeye çalışmışlardır. Mevcut literatürde, otoriterizm ile sosyal güven arasındaki ilişkilere odaklanan ve göçmenler için çeşitli tutumlar ve algılar geliştiren benzer teorik ve ampirik çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Yüksek sosyal güven ile insanlar göçmenlere karşı daha olumlu tutumlara sahip olurken, sosyal güveni düşük insanlar bu yazının hipotezinin bir parçası olan göçmenlere karşı daha olumsuz tutumlara sahip olmaktadırlar. Sosyal güven daha fazla sosyal bütünlük ve entegrasyon sağladığı için, sosyal güven ve sosyal sermaye bakımından zengin olan Batı toplumlarında göçmenlere yönelik tutumlarda sosyal güvenin önemli bir rolü olduğu söylenebilir. Buna bağlı olarak, bu tür toplumlarda, yüksek sosyal güven, göçmenlere karşı olumlu tutum geliştirmede etkili olmaktadır. Bu makale, çağdaş Amerikan toplumu bağlamında sosyal güven ve otoriterizmin göçmen karşıtı tutumlar geliştirmedeki etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. 2016 ANES Zaman Serisi Çalışması verilerine ve OLS regresyon analizi metodolojisine dayanarak, çalışma şu hipotezleri test etmiştir: 1 düşük sosyal güven ve yüksek otoriterizm düzeyleri, insanların göçmenlere yönelik tutumları üzerinde güçlü etkiye sahiptir ve 2 sosyal güvenin göçmenlere yönelik olumsuz tutum geliştirmedeki etkisi eğitim seviyesine göre değişmektedir. OLS analizini kullanarak, düşük sosyal güven ve yüksek otoriterizm düzeylerinin, göçmen karşıtı tutumlara sahip olmakla güçlü bir şekilde ilişkili olduğu; ayrıca, sosyal güven ve göçmenlere yönelik olumsuz tutumlar arasındaki ilişkinin lisans derecesine sahip kişiler için, sahip olmayanlardan daha büyük olduğu sonuçları bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Sosyal Güven, Otoriterlik, Göçmenlik

Social Trust, Authoritarianism and Immigration Attitudes

In recent decades, the issue of immigration has started to attract scholarly attention while being considered as problematic by the host communities of many developed nations. Accordingly, researchers in the related fields have attempted to discover the main dynamics of the growing anti-immigrant attitudes in those countries receiving the majority of the immigrant population. In the existing literature, there have been similar theoretical and empirical studies that focus on these relations between authoritarianism and social trust and developing varying attitudes and perceptions for immigrants. While, with high social trust, people are to have more positive attitudes towards immigrants, people with low social trust are to have more negative attitudes towards immigrants, which was a part of this paper’s hypothesis. If the social trust provides more social cohesion and integration, it can be argued that social trust has an important role in the attitudes towards immigrants in Western societies that are rich in social capital and trust. Accordingly, in such societies, it is reasonable to hypothesize that high social trust would have an impact on developing a positive attitude towards immigrants. This paper aims to explore the effect of social trust and authoritarianism on developing anti-immigrant attitudes within the context of contemporary American society. Based on the data from the 2016 ANES Time Series Study and with the methodology of OLS regression analysis, the study tests the following hypotheses: 1 low social trust and high levels of authoritarianism have strong influence on people’s attitudes towards immigrants and 2 the effect of social trust on developing negative attitudes towards immigrants varies by education level. Using the OLS analysis, we find that low levels of social trust and high levels of authoritarianism are strongly associated with having anti-immigrant attitudes. We also find that the relationship between social trust and negative attitudes towards immigrants is greater for people who have a bachelor’s degree than for people who do not.

Keywords:

Social Trust, Authoritarianism, Immigration,

PDF

___

Adorno, T. W., Else, F.-B., Levinson, D. J., Sanford, R. N., Betty Levinson, M. H., Morrow W., The Authoritarian Personality, New York, Wiley, 1950.
Altemeyer, B., Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1988.
Altemeyer, B., The Authoritarian Specter, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1996.
Americans and Social Trust: Who, Where and Why (2007). Pew Research Center. Avaliable at: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2007/02/22/americans-and-social-trust-who-where-and-why/ [Erişim tarihi: 08.12.2018].
Bacharach, M. and Gambetta, D. (2001). “Trust in Signs”, In K. S. Cook (ed.), Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 148–184.
Costa, D. L. and Kahn, M. E. (2003) “Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist's Perspective”, Perspectives on Politics, 1 (1), 103–111.
Crocker, J., Major, B., and Steele, C. M. (1998). “Social Stigma”. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (Eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, Boston: McGraw-Hill, pp. 504–553.
Danso, H. A., Sedlovskaya, A., and Suanda, S. H. (2007). “Perceptions of immigrants: Modifying the attitudes of individuals higher in social dominance orientation”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1113–1123.
Delhey, J. and Newton, K. (2005) “Predicting Cross‐National Levels of Social Trust. Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism?”, European Sociological Review, 21 (4), 311–327.
Devine, P. G., Evett, S. R., and Vasquez-Suson, K. A. (1996). “Exploring the interpersonal dynamics of intergroup contact”. In R. Sorrentino and E. T. Higgins (Eds.) Handbook of motivation and cognition: Vol. 3. The interpersonal context, New York: Guilford, pp. 423–464.
Duckitt, J. and Sibley, C. G. (2009). “A dual-process motivational model of ideological attitudes and system justification”. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay and H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eckhardt, W. (1991). “Authoritarianism”, Political Psychology, 12(1), 97–124.
Espenshade, T. J. and Hempstead, K. (1996). “Contemporary American Attitudes Toward U.S. Immigration”, The International Migration Review, 30(2), 535–570.
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., and Armstrong, T. L. (2001). “The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity”, Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389–412.
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., and Hodson, G. (2002). “Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in the United States and Canada in Response to the September 11, 2001, Attack on America”, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 69–85.
Feldman, N., After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy, New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003.
Gambetta, D. and Hamill, H. S., How Taxi Drivers Establish Their Customers’ Trustworthiness, New York, Russell Sage, 2005.
Hero, R. E. (2003). “Social Capital and Racial Inequality in America”, Perspectives in Politics, 1 (1), 113–122.
Herreros, F., and Criado, H. (2009). “Social Trust, Social Capital and Perceptions of Immigration”, Political Studies, 57(2), 337–355.
Hetherington, Marc J. and Weiler, J. D., Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997). “Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross‐Country Investigation”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4), 1251–1288.
Oyamot, C. M., Borgida, E. and Fisher, E. L. (2006). “Can values moderate the attitudes of right‐wing authoritarians?”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 486–500.
Putnam, R. D., Bowling A., The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, Simon and Schuster, 2000.
Rustenbach, E. (2010). “Sources of Negative Attitudes Toward Immigrants in Europe”, International Migration Review, 44 (1), 53-77.
Sales, S. M. (1973). “Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44–57.
Stenner, K., The Authoritarian Dynamic, New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Troper, H. (1993). “Canada’s immigration policy since 1945”, International Journal; Toronto, 48(2), 255–281.
Uslaner, E., The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Yamagishi, T. (2001). “Trust as A Form of Social Intelligence”, In K. Cook (ed.), Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 121–47.