An Investigation of Elementary School 4-7th Grade Students' Ability to Link Equivalent Fractions' Symbolic and Graphical Representations*

An Investigation of Elementary School 4-7th Grade Students' Ability to Link Equivalent Fractions' Symbolic and Graphical Representations*

The purpose of this study was to determine elementary school 4-7th grade students' ability to link equivalent fractions' symbolic and graphical representations. The design of this research was a survey study. The sample of the study consisted of 4, 5, 6, and 7th-grade elementary school students in the Sakarya province, Turkey. The study was conducted with 1111 students from 11 elementary schools. Representational Fluency Test (RFT) developed by Niemi (1996) was used as a measurement tool. The RFT included items involving regional areas, line segments, and set representations to assess the part-whole meaning and those involving number lines to assess the measure meaning of the rational number. As the normality assumption was violated, non-parametric tests were applied. The results of the analyses showed that the students' performance to link equivalent fractions' symbolic and graphical representations changed significantly with respect to the representation type (region-line segment, region-number line, set-line segment, set-number line, line segment- number line) and with respect to simple and equivalent fractions. Meanwhile, it was seen that as the classroom levels increased, the success rates in overall scores, representation types, except region- line segment, and simple and equivalent fractions increased.

___

  • Aliustaoğlu, F., Tuna, A., & Biber, A. Ç. (2018). The misconceptions of sixth grade secondary school students on fractions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(5), 591-599.
  • Armstrong, B., & Larson, C. (1995). Students' use of part-whole and direct comparison strategies for comparing partitioned rectangles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 2-19. doi:10.2307/749225
  • Baykul, Y. (2005). İlköğretimde matematik öğretimi (1–5.Sınıflar İçin) [Mathematics teaching in primary education (For Grades 1-5)]. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T. R., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio, and proportion. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 296–333). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
  • Behr, M., Khoury, H., Harel, G., Post, T. & Lesh, R., (1997) Conceptual units analysis of preservice elementary school teachers' strategies on a rational-number-as-operator task. Journal of Mathematics Education, 28(1), 48-69.
  • Behr, M., Lesh, R., Post, T., & Silver E. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, (pp. 91-125). New York: Academic Press.
  • Bright, G., Behr, M., Post, T. & Wachsmuth, I. (1988). Identifying fractions on number lines. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(3), 215-232.
  • Castro-Rodríguez, E., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Rico, L., & Gómez, P. (2016). Prospective teachers' understanding of the multiplicative part-whole relationship of fraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 129-146.
  • Charalambous, C. Y. & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2007). Drawing on a theoretical model to study students' understandings of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 293–316.
  • Clarke, D. M., Roche, A., & Mitchell, A. (2008). 10 practical tips for making fractions come alive and make sense. Mathematics Teaching in The Middle School, 13(7), 372-380.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Contreras, J. N., Martinez-Cruz, A. M. (2000). Prospective elementary teachers' dominant situations and knowledge about representations of rational numbers. Twenty-second Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psycology of Mathematics Education, (7-10 October), Tucson, Arizona
  • Cramer, K. & Henry, A. (2002). Using manipulative models to build number sense for addition and fractions. In B. Litwiller (Ed.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp. 41-48). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
  • Cramer, K., Wyberg, T., & Leavitt, S. (2008). The role of representations in fraction addition and subtraction. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 13(8), 490-496. Choike, J. (2000). Teaching strategies for algebra for all. The Mathematics Teacher, 93(7), 556-560.
  • Çaylan-Ergene, B., & Ergene, Ö. (2020). Repeating decimals and irrational numbers on the number line: Through the lens of pre-service and in-service mathematics teachers. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.13.2.15
  • Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Teachers facing the dilemma of multiple representations being aid and obstacle for learning: Evaluations of tasks and theme-specific noticing. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 36(1), 23-44.
  • Elia, I., Panaoura, A., Eracleous, A., & Gagatsis, A. (2007). Relations between secondary pupils' conceptions about functions and problem solving in different representations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 533-556.
  • Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 105-121.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gabriel, F., Coché, F., Szucs, D., Carette, V., Rey, B., & Content, A. (2013). A componential view of children's difficulties in learning fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 715.
  • Gravemeijer, K. P., Lehrer, R., van Oers, H. J., & Verschaffel, L. (Eds.). (2013). Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (Vol. 30). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Gürbüz, R. & Birgin, O. (2008). Farklı öğrenim seviyesindeki öğrencilerin rasyonel sayıların farklı gösterim şekilleriyle işlem yapma performanslarının karşılaştırılması [The comparison of students’ performance at different grades regarding to making operation with different types of representation of the rational numbers]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 23(1), 85-94.
  • Hart, K.M. (1987). Practical work and formalisation, too great a gap. J.C. Bergeron, N. Herscovics, C. Kieran. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-XI) Vol II, 408-415. Montreal.
  • Hull, L. (2005). Fraction models that promote understanding for elementary students. [Unpublished master's thesis]. University of Central Florida.
  • Hunting, R. P. (1984). Understanding equivalent fractions. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 7, 26-33.
  • Kamii, C., & Clark, F. B. (1995). Equivalent fractions: Their difficulty and educational implications. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 365-378.
  • Kılıç, Ç. (2009). İlköğretim beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin matematiksel problemlerin çözümlerinde kullandıkları temsiller [Representations the Fifth Grade Primary School Students Used in The Process of Solving Mathematical Problems]. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from Turkish Council of Higher Education Thesis Database (Thesis Number: 235250).
  • Kieren, T. E. (1988). Personal knowledge of rational numbers: Its intuitive and formal development. In M. J. Behr & J. Hiebert (Eds), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 162–181). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Larson, N. C. (2000). The development of the part-whole and measure subconstructs of four sixth-graders during an instructional unit. Twenty-second Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psycology of Mathematics Education, (7-10 October), Tucson, Arizona.
  • Lesh, R. (1979). Mathematical learning disabilities: Considerations for identification, diagnosis, and remediation. In R. Lesh, D. Mierkiewicz, & M. G. Kantowski (Eds.), Applied mathematical problem solving (pp. 111-180). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SM.
  • Lubinski, C. A., & Otto, A. D. (2002). Meaningful mathematical representations and early algebraic reasoning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(2), 76-80.
  • Mamolo, A. (2009). Intuitions of 'infinite numbers': Infinite magnitude vs. infinite representation. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 6(3), 305-330.
  • Mısral, M. (2009). Kesrin farklı anlamlarına göre yapılan öğretimin İlköğretim 6. Sınıf öğrencilerinin kesirlerde toplama çıkarma ve çarpma işlemlerinde kavramsal ve işlemsel bilgi düzeylerine etkisi [the effect of the education which is done by the different subconstructs of fractions on the conceptual and operational knowledge levels of primary school 6th grade students about adding subtraction and multiplication in fraction]. (Masters’ Thesis). Retrieved from Turkish Council of Higher Education Thesis Database (Thesis Number: 237470).
  • Montague, M. (2006). Math problem solving for middle school students with disabilities. Washington, DC: The Access Center: Improving Outcomes for all Students K-8. Retrieved on November 11, 2021, from http://www.k8accesscenter.org
  • Muzheve, M. T. (2014). Pre-service teachers' conceptions of representations of equivalent fractions and of fraction units. In Matney, G. T. and Che, S. M. (Eds.) (pp. 57-63). Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Research Council on Mathematics Learning. San Antonio, TX.
  • Ni, Y. (2001). Semantic domains of rational numbers and the acquisition of fraction equivalence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 400–417.
  • Niemi, D. (1996). Instructional influence on content area explanations and represenational knowledge: Evidence for the construct validity of measures of principled understanding. CSE Technical Report 403. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
  • Nistal, A. A., Van Dooren, W., Clarebout, G., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: a critical review. ZDM, 41(5), 627-636.
  • Olkun S., & Toluk Uçar Z. (2004). İlköğretimde etkinlik temelli matematik öğretimi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Park, J., Güçler, B., & McCrory, R. (2013). Teaching prospective teachers about fractions: Historical and pedagogical perspectives, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 455-479.
  • Pesen, C. (2003). Eğitim fakülteleri ve sınıf öğretmenleri için matematik öğretimi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım
  • Pesen, C. (2008). Kesirlerin sayi doğrusu üzerindeki gösteriminde öğrencilerin öğrenme güçlükleri ve kavram yanilgilari [students’ learning difficulties and misconceptions in pointing the fractions on the number line]. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(15), 157–168.
  • Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget's Theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology. Wiley.
  • Piaget, J. (1987). Possibility and necessity. Vol. II: The role of necessity in cognitive development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1960). The child's conception of geometry. (E.A. Lunzer, Trans.) New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1948).
  • Putra, Z. H. (2018). A praxeological analysis of pre-service elementary teachers' knowledge of rational numbers. Recherches En Didactique Des Mathematiques, 38(3), 315-364.
  • Putra, Z. H. (2019). Praxeological change and the density of rational numbers: The case of pre-service teachers in Denmark and Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), em1711.
  • Sidney, P. G., Thompson, C. A., & Rivera, F. D. (2019). Number lines, but not area models, support children's accuracy and conceptual models of fraction division. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 288-298.
  • Siebert, D. & Gaskin, N. (2006). Creating, naming, and justifying fractions. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(8), 394-400.
  • Sirotic, N., & Zazkis, R. (2007). Irrational numbers on the number line – where are they? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(4), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390601151828
  • Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm of developmental research, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Toluk, Z. (2002). İlkokul öğrencilerinin bölme işlemi ve rasyonel sayıları ilişkilendirme süreçleri [Division process and rational numbers association processes of primary school students]. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 19(2), 81-101.
  • Toluk-Uçar, Z. (2009). Developing pre-service teachers understanding of fractions through problem posing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 166-175.
  • Wong, M., Evans, D. & Anderson, J. (2006). Developing a diagnostic assessment instrument for identifying students' understanding of fraction equivalence. The University of Sydney. ACSPRI Conference.( December) Sydney, Australia.
  • Wong, M. & Evans, D. (2011). Assessing students' understanding of fraction equivalence. In J. Way & J. Bobis (Eds.), Fractions: Teaching for Understanding (pp. 81-90). Adelaide: The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc.
  • Yazgan, Y. (2007). 10-11 yaş grubundaki öğrencilerin kesirleri kavramalari üzerine deneysel bir çalişma [An experimental study on fraction understanding of children at the age of 10 and 11]. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from Turkish Council of Higher Education Thesis Database (Thesis Number: 220989).