An Investigation of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Teacher Quality in Turkey

Present study investigates the senior-level Turkish pre-service and in-service teachers’ perceptions of teacher quality with a descriptive survey method. Data for this study were gathered through Teacher Quality Survey (TQS) and open-ended questions from 210 pre-service teachers enrolled in four different universities in Turkey and 147 in-service teachers from different majors. Results of the study showed that both pre-service and in-service teachers think that teachers’ relationship with the students affect students’ success and teachers should take the individual differences into consideration. Moreover, according to the pre-service teachers, teachers should know how to teach and assess what they teach, and they need to know time management. On the other hand, in-service teachers consider that teachers should follow current developments, should have the researcher identity and should understand students’ needs and interests. Present study also suggested both academic and practical implications

___

  • Akyüz, Y. (2009). Türk Eğitim Tarihi. Pegem Akademi, Ankara. Ata, Bahri (2001). 1924 Türk basını ışığında Amerikalı eğitimci John Dewey’in Türkiye seyahati, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3).
  • Bozdoğan, A. E., Aydın, D. & Yıldırım, K. (2007). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 8(2).
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Geliştirilmiş 2. baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Cresswell. J. (2002). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of State policy evidence. Journal of Education Policy Analysis, 8(1).
  • Duck, L. (2000). The ongoing professional journey, Educational Leadership, 57(8), 43-45.
  • Eby, J. (1994). Reflective planning, teaching and evaluation: K-12. New York: Merrill.
  • Freeman, D. & Richards, R. J. (1993). Conceptions of Teaching and the Education of Second Language Teachers, TESOL Quartery, 27(2).
  • Goldhaber, D. & Brewer, D. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school Teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2),129-146.
  • Hanushek, E. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 100(1), 84-117.
  • Hanushek, E. A. & Rivkin, S. G. (2007). Pay, working conditions and Teacher quality, Future of Children, 17(1).
  • Harris, D. N. & Sass, T. R. (2010). Teacher training, teacher quality, student achievement, Journal of Public Economics, 95.
  • Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • M. E. (2015). Teacher quality and school improvement: what is the role of research?, Oxford Review of Education, 41(2).
  • Okpala, C. O. & Ellis, R. (2000). The perceptions of college students on teacher quality: A Focus on teacher qualifications, Education, 126(2).
  • Ornstein, A. C., & Levine, D. U. (2003). Foundations of education (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Özbek, R., Kahyaoğlu, M. & Özgen, N. (2007). Evaluation of Candidate Teachers’ Opinions on Teaching Profession, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2).
  • Sabers, D., Selby, L., & Nolan, P. (1995). Computers empower students with special Needs, Educational Leadership, 53(2)., 82-84.
  • Sanders, W. L. & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. In Education Trust, Thinking K-16: Good teaching matters: How well qualified teachers can close the gap.
  • Seferoğlu, G. (2004). A study of alternative English teacher certification practices in Turkey, Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(2).
  • Seker, H., Deniz, S. & Görgen, İ. (2005). Tezsiz yüksek lisans öğretmen adaylarinin öğretmenlik yeterlikleri üzerine değerlendirmeleri, Kuram ve UYgulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 42.
  • Semerci, C., Semerci, N., Eliüşük, A. & Kartal, E. (2012). Öğretmenlik mesleğinin gündemine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (Bartın ili örneği). Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 22-40.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 19(2), 4-14.
  • Wiswall, M. (2013). The dynamics of teacher quality, Journal of Public Economics, 100.
  • Yetim, A. A. & Göktaş, Z. (2004). Öğretmenin mesleki ve kişisel yetenekleri, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 12(2).