Pseudo-mirror nuclei in the mass regions A~ 170 and A~ 200

The concept of pseudo-mirror nuclei is based on the NπNv scheme introduced as an extension of the NpNn scheme. The NπNv scheme tells us that if two nuclei from different mass region have equal number of integrated n-p interaction than the experimental observables E(2+), E(4+)/E(2+) and B(E2; 2+→ 0+) are expected to be almost equal, therefore equal number of n-p interaction build similar level schemes up to certain spin quantum numbers. Pseudo-mirror nuclei have been introduced for the first time in the mass regions A ~ 100 and A ~ 130 for Mo, Zr, Nd and Ce nuclei. Later, a systematic work carried out over a broad region of Segre chart showed that not only the excitation energies but also related B(E2) values of excited states in pseudo-mirror nuclei (PMN) are in good agreement. In the present work, we present new pseudo-mirror nuclei in the mass region A ~ 170 and A ~ 200 for the first time.

___

E. Rutherford, “LXXIX. The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom,” Philosophical Magazine Series 6, vol. 21, no. 125, pp. 669-688, 1911.

P.W. Anderson, “More is different,” Science, vol. 177, no. 4047, pp. 393, 1972.

W. Heisenberg, “Über den Bau der Atomkerne. I,” Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei, vol. 77, pp. 1, 1932.

J. Ekman et.al, “The A = 51 mirror nuclei 51Fe and 51Mn,” The European Journal of Physics A, vol. 9, pp. 13–17, 2000.

D. Tonev et.al, “Transition rates and nuclear structure changes in mirror nuclei 47Cr and 47V,” Physical Review C, vol. 65, pp. 034314, 2002.

R. Wirowski et.al, “Valence mirror nuclei,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics, vol. 14, pp. L195, 1988.

R.F. Casten et.al, “Simplified shell model calculations for valence mirror nuclei,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 514, pp. 252, 1990.

J. Yan et.al, “Proton-neutron symmetry in valence mirror nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 42, pp. 743, 1990.

M. Schimmer et.al, “The valence mirror nuclei 114Sn and 146Gd,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 569, pp. 458, 1994.

R. Moscrop et.al, “Pseudo-mirror nuclei with A=100 and A=130,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics, vol. 14, pp. L189, 1989.

R.F. Casten, “NpNn systematics in heavy nuclei,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 443, pp. 1, 1985.

B. Sayğı, “Investigation of the B(E2) systematics in pseudo-mirror nuclei,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 45, pp. 095104, 2018.

B. Sayğı, “Symmetrical level schemes of the even-even Sma≈130 and Yba≈160 nuclei up to 10+ in the yrast bands,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 980, pp. 15 -20, 2018.

J. Blachot, “Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 108*,” Nuclear Data Sheets, vol. 90, pp. 135, 2000.

J. Katakura and Z.D. Wu, “Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 124*,” Nuclear Data Sheets, vol. 109, pp. 1655, 2008.

S.L. King et.al, “First observation of excited states in the neutron deficient nuclei 164Os and 166Os,” Physical Review C, vol. 62, pp. 067301, 2000.

J.J. Ressler et.al, “Isomeric decay of 208Ra,” Physical Review C, vol. 71, pp. 014302, 2005.

J.F.C. Cocks et.al, “Gamma-ray spectroscopy of neutron-deficient Ra isotopes,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics, vol. 25, pp. 839, 1999.

G.D. Dracoulis et.al, “Shape coexistence from the structure of the yrast band in 174Pt,” Physical Review C, vol. 44, pp. R1246, 1991.

R.B.E. Taylor et.al, “Gamma decay of excited states in 198Rn identified using correlated radioactive decay,” Physical Review C, vol. 59, pp. 673, 1999.

S. Raman et.al, “Transition probability from the ground to the first-excited 2+ state of even-even nuclides,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 78, pp. 1, 2001.

P. Möller et.al, “Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM (2012),” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 109-110, pp. 1, 2016.

A. De-Shalit and M. Goldhaber, “Mixed configurations in nuclei,” Physical Review, vol. 92, pp. 1211, 1953.

I. Talmi, “Effective interactions and coupling schemes in nuclei,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 34, pp. 704, 1962.

P. Federman and S. Pittel, “Towards a unified microscopic description of nuclear deformation,” Physics Letter B, vol. 69, pp. 385, 1977.

P. Federman and S. Pittel, “Unified shellmodel description of nuclear deformation,” Physical Review C, vol. 20, pp. 820, 1979.

J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarawich, J. Skalski ve T. Werner, “Nuclear deformation: A proton-neutron effect?,” Physical Review Letter, vol. 60, pp. 2254, 1988.