Ön çapraz bağ rehabilitasyonu konulu Türkçe videoların bilgi kalitesi: YouTube örneği’nde kesitsel araştırma

Amaç: Ön çapraz bağ (ÖÇB) yaralanmaları, spor yaralanmaları içerisinde en sık görülenlerdir. Hasta, ameliyat olsun ya da olmasın sportif rehabilitasyon ile tedavi edilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, YouTube’deki ÖÇB rehabilitasyonu konulu Türkçe video kalitelerini analiz etmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırma kapsamında seçilen anahtar kelimeler ile YouTube’de arama yapıldı. Videoların tanımlayıcı özellikleri kaydedildi. Videoların bilgi kalitesini değerlendirmek için; YouTube için modifiye edilmiş DISCERN ölçüm aracı, JAMA karşılaştırma skoru, YouTube ÖÇB’ye özel skor, Ulusal Tıp Merkezi Güvenirlik Kriterleri ve global kalite skoru kullanıldı. Bulgular: Videoların %57,4 (n=35)’ü hasta, %29,5 (n=18)’i doktor, %8,2 (n=5)’i fizyoterapist ve %4,9 (n=3)’u kişiye özel antrenör tarafından hazırlanmıştı. Videoların kümülatif izlenme sayısı 1786558 idi. Ortalama görüntüleme oranı 23,8±19,8; beğenme oranı 93,2±5,4 ve video güç indeksi 22,4±18,9 olarak hesaplandı. Videoların tanımlayıcı bilgilerinde meslek gruplarına göre fark tespit edilmedi (p>0,05). Ortalama DISCERN puanı 1,5±1,5; JAMA puanı 1,2±0,7; YouTube ÖÇB’ye özel skoru 3,8±4,4; Ulusal Tıp Merkezi Güvenirlik Kriterleri puanı 2,6±2,2 ve global kalite skoru 2,6±1,2 olarak belirlendi. Videoların bilgi kalitesi, meslek gruplarına göre fark oluşturdu (p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

youtube, ön çapraz bağ, rehabilitasyon, video, bilgi

Information quality of Turkish videos on anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: cross-sectional research on YouTube example

Objective: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are the most common among sports injuries. The patient should be treated with sportive rehabilitation, with or without surgery. The aim of this study is to analyze the quality of Turkish videos on ACL rehabilitation on YouTube. Material and Method: A search was made on YouTube with the keywords selected within the scope of the research. The descriptive features of the videos were recorded. To evaluate the information quality of the videos; modified DISCERN measurement tool for YouTube, JAMA score, YouTube ACL specific score, National Library of Medicine (NLM) Trustworthy Criteria and global quality score were used. Results: 57.4% (n=35) of the videos were patients, 29.5% (n=18) were doctors, 8.2% (n=5) were physiotherapists, and 4.9% (n=3) was prepared by a personal trainer. The cumulative number of views of the videos was 1786558. View rate 23.8±19.8, like rate was 93.2±5.4 and video power index was calculated as 22.4±18.9. There was no difference in the descriptive information of the videos according to occupational groups (p>0.05). The mean DISCERN score was 1.5±1.5, JAMA score 1.2±0.7, YouTube ACL specific score was 3.8±4.4, NLM Trustworthy Criteria score was 2.6±2.2 and global quality score was 2.6±1.2. The information quality of the videos made a difference according to the occupational groups (p

Keywords:

youtube, anterior cruciate ligament, rehabilitation, video, information,

PDF

___

1. Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, Hamati F, LaPrade RF, Forsythe B, et al. YouTube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019;1(2):e109–114.
2.Kaicker J, Dang W, Mondal T. Assessing the quality and reliability of health ınformation on ERCP using the DISCERN ınstrument. Health Care Curr Rev. 2013;1:104.
3.Springer B, Bechler U, Koller U, Windhager R, Waldstein W. Online videos provide poor information quality, reliability, and accuracy regarding rehabilitation and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2020;36(12):3037–3047.
4.Ward B, Lin A, Lin J, Patrick M, Boris P, et al. YouTube searches for anterior cruciate ligament injury promote biased, low-quality videos. Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2020;5(12):1-4.
5.Kunze KN, Krivicich LM, Verma NN, Chahla J. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for the meniscus: a YouTube-based quality-control study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2020;36(1):233–238.
6.Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES, Cleary M, Byrne DP, Devitt BM, et al. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(3):840–845.
7.Dunphy E, Hamilton FL, Spasić I, Button K. Acceptability of a digital health intervention alongside physiotherapy to support patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):471.
8.Bruce-Brand RA, Baker JF, Byrne DP, Hogan NA, McCarthy T. Assessment of the quality and content of information on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the internet. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2013;29(6):1095–1100.
9.Celik H, Polat O, Ozcan C, Camur S, Kilinc BE, Uzun M. Assessment of the quality and reliability of the information on rotator cuff repair on YouTube. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(1):31–34.
10.Sigonney F, Steltzlen C, Bouché PA, Pujol N. A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(2_ suppl):2325967121S0001.
11.Kunze KN. Editorial Commentary: YouTube videos provide poor-quality medical ınformation: don’t believe what you watch! Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2020;36(12):3048–3049.
12.Akpolat AO, Kurdal DP. Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate? J Orthop Surg. 2020;15(1):78.
13.Montgomery KC. “Büyük Veri” devrinde çocukların gizliliğinin korunması. Çocuk ve Medeni. 2018;3(5):23–46.
14.Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the ınformation in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018;43(22):E1334–1339.
15.Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for Information on rheumatoid arthritis — a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899–903.
16. Rothrock SG, Rothrock AN, Swetland SB, Pagane M, Isaak SA, Romney J, et al. Quality, trustworthiness, readability, and accuracy of medical information regarding common pediatric emergency medicine-related complaints on the web. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(4):469–477.
17. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105– 111.
18. Silberg W, Lundberg G, Musacchio R. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor–Let the reader and viewer beware JAMA. 1997;277:1244–1245.
19. Yaradılmış YU, Evren AT, Okkaoğlu MC, Haberal B, Özdemir M. Evaluation of quality and reliability of YouTube videos on spondylolisthesis. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2020;22:100827.
20. Ceyhan E, Gurhan U, İnci F, Karaismailoğlu E, Yavuz Aİ, Koçak C, ve ark. Türkçe internet sitelerindeki ortopedik hastalıklar hakkındaki bilgilerin değerlendirilmesi: ön çapraz bağ rüptürü üzerine pilot bir çalışma. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Derg. 2020;27(3):323-330.