Konusları Farklı Sonlu Hareketli Bölümlü Protezlerde Fotoelastik Stres Analizi
Sonu serbest biten hareketli bölümlü protezler[HBP] sert ve yumuşak destek doku üzerinde stresesebep olabilir ve bu stres zararlı etkilere yol açabilir.Bu çalışmanın amacı 3 boyutlu fotoelastik stres analizyöntemiyle farklı taper açılı konik tutuculu teleskopiksonu serbest biten HBP lerin ve kroşe tutuculuHBP’nin dişsiz alanlarında ve destek diş etrafındakialveol karşılaştırılmasıdır.Otuz adet periodontal mebranı ve mukozası olansonu dişsiz sonlanan fotoelastik mandibular model 5gruba ayrıldı. Beş farklı HBP; kroşe tutuculu, Mezial[M] ve distal [D] 2°, M ve D 4°, M 4° D 2° ve M 2°D 4° olacak şekilde dört adet farklı konik açılıteleskopik HBP olarak hazırlandı. Bu protezlerüzerine dikey ve eğik 50 Newtonluk kuvvetler tektaraflı noktalarının (A. B, C,…G) frinç değerleri (N) olarakölçüldü, Elde edilen değerler Kruskal Wallis ve Mann
PHOTOELASTIC STRESS ANALYSIS OF DISTAL EXTENSION REMOVABLE PARTIAL TELESCOPIC DENTURES WITH DIFFERENT CONICAL CROWNS
Distal extension removable partial denture(RPD) can cause stress on supporting hard tissues,which may lead to harmful effects. The purpose of thisstudy is to investigate the pattern of these stressesoverthe residual alveolar ridge and alveolar bone aroundthe abutment teeth by distal extension conical crownretaineddifferent taper angles usingphotoelectric stress analysis.Thirty distal extension photoelastic mandible modelswith simulated periodontal ligaments and mucosawere divided into five groups. Vertical and oblique5 0 N loading forces were applied over the dentures.These dentures involved one claps denture and fourCCRTDs that conical crowns were planned mesial (M)and distal (D) 2°, M and D 4°, M 4° D 2° and M 2°D 4°. Fr i n g e smeasurement points (A, B,C,..G) were measured andthe data were evaluated by use Kruskal-Wallis andMann-Whitney test. While the stress on the RPD withclaps was concentrated on the point C where the distalabutment teeth and residual ridge meet, it wasconcentrated on the apex of abutment teeth in theCCRTDs.The significantly at point B, and under vertical loading atpoints A and C.Significant changes were observed between the pointsA, C, D and F in the second denture, points C and G inthe 3th, and B; in the 5th, unlike the points in the 1stand4thdentures
___
- 1. Kuzmanovic DV, Payner GT, Purton DG.
Distal implant modify the Kennedy classification
of removable partial denture: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92:8-11.
- 2. Kratochvill FJ, Caputo AA . Photoelastic
analysis of pressure on teeth and bone
supporting removable partial dentures. J
Prosthet Dent 1974; 32:52-61.
- 3. Myers RE, Pfeifer DL, Mitchell DL, Peleu
GB. A photoelastic study of rests on solitary
abutmentsfor distal-extension removable
partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:
702-707.
- 4. Aras MA. Extracronal direct retainers for
distal extension removable partial denture.
The J Indian Prosthodontic Society 2005;
5:65 -71.
- 5. Chou TM, Caputo AA, Moore DJ, et al.
Photoelastic analysis and comparison of
force - transmission characteristics of
intracoronal attachments with clasp
distal-extension removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:313-319.
- 6. Fermandes CP, Glantz PJ, Sevensson SA, et
al . Reflection photoelasticity: a new
method for studies of clinical mechanics in
prosthetic dentistry. Dental Materials 2003;
19:106-117.
- 7. Güngör MA, Artunç C, Sonugelen M. Parameters affecting retentive force of conus
crowns Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 271-277.
- 8. Akagawa Y, Seo T, Ohkawa S, et al. A new
telescopic crown system using a soldered
horizontal pin for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:228-231.
- 9. Güngör MA, Artunç C, Sonugelen M, et al.
The evaluation of the removal force on the
conus crowned telescopic prostheses with
the finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil
2002; 29:1069-1075.
- 10. Minagi S, Natsuaki N, Nishigawa G, et al.
New telescopic crown design for removable
partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1989;
81:684-68.
- 11. Labaig C, Marco R, Fons A, et al. Biodynamics of attachments used in overdentures : Experimental analysis with photoelasticity. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:183-190.
- 12. Ochia TK, Ozawv S, Caputo AA, et al. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant -tooth
connected prostheses with segmented and
nonsegmented abutments. J Prosthet Dent
2003; 89:495-502.
- 13. Asundi A, Kishen A. A strain gauge and
photoelastic analysis of in vivo strain and
in vitro stress distribution in human dental
supporting structures. Archives of Oral Biology 2000; 45:543-550.
- 14. JW, Rile WF. Experimental Stress Analysis
(3
th
ed). McGraww-Hill, Eng 1991; pp 453
-461.
- 15. Loney RW, Kotowicz WE, McDowell GC.
Three-dimensional photoelasti c stress anlysis of the ferrule effect in cast post and cores.
J Prosthet Dent1990; 63:506-512.
- 16. Hearn EJ. Photoelasticity(Merrow Technical Library Practical Science) (7 th ed.).
Merrow, Eng 1971; pp 34-37.
- 17. Itoh H, Caputo AA, Wylie R, et al. Effects of
periodontal and fixed splinting on load
transfer by removable partial dentures. J
Prosthet Dent 1998; 79:465-471.
- 18. Reitz PV, Sanders JL, Caputo AA. A photoelastic study ofa split palatal major connector. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51(1):19-23.
- 19. Reitz PV, Caputo AA. A photoelastic study of
stress distribution by a mandibular split major
connector. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54(2):220 -
225.
- 20. Thayer HH, Caputo A A. Photoelastic stress
analysis of overdenture attachments. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43(6):611-617.
- 21. White JT. Visualization of stress and strain
related to removable partial denture abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40(2):143-151.
- 22. White SN, Caputo A A. Effect of cantilever
length on stress transfer by implantsupported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent1994;
71(5):493-499.
- 23. Wylie RS, Caputo AA. Fixed cantilever
splints on teeth with normal and reduced
periodontal support. J Prosthet Dent 1991;
66:737-742.
- 24. Saıto M, Mıura Y, Notanı K, et al. Stress
dstrubution of abutments and base displacement with precision attachment and
telescopic crown retained removable partial denteres. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:482-
487.
- 25. Ko SH, McDowell GC, Kotowicz WE. Photoelastic stress analysis of mandibular removable partial dentures with mesial and
distal occlusal rests. J Prosthet Dent 1986;
56(4):454-460.
- 26. Kramprich M. İmplant dayanıklı bir teleskop
protezin yenilenmesi. Quintessence 2001; 12
(3):65 72.
- 27. McArthur DR. Canines as removable partial denture abutments. Part II: Rest and
undercut location for retainers. J Prosthet
Dent 1986; 56(4):445-450.
- 28. Perel ML. Telescope dentures. J Prosthet
Dent 1973; 29(2): 151-156.