Ali Ahmet ARIKAN, Şadan YAVUZ, Kamil Turan BERKİ

4124

EVAR'ın Maliyet Etkinliğini Öngörmede Siena ve St George Vascular Institute Risk Skorlama Sistemleri

Amaç: Endovasküler anevrizma onarımı (EVAR), abdominal aort anevrizmalarının (AAA) tedavisinde yaygın olarak kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Siena EVAR ve St.George Vasküler Enstitüsü (SGVI) puanları, EVAR ile ilgili olası müdahaleleri öngörmek için kullanılan risk puanlarıdır. Bu çalışmada, risk skorlarını doğrulamak ve skorlama sistemlerinin popülasyonumuzda hastane maliyet etkinliği için öngörülerini karşılaştırmak amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza en az 6 ay takip süresine sahip rüptüre olmayan infrarenal AAA'lı 39 hasta dahil edildi. Siena EVAR skoru ve SGVI skoru hesaplandı. Risk grupları arasında komplikasyonların (ilk operasyonundaki ek işlemler, takip sırasında girişim ihtiyacı), maliyet (ilk işlem ve genel), anevrizmaya bağlı mortalite arasındaki ilişki karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Çalışmamızda SGVI skoru yüksek riskli ve düşük riskli grupları arasında, takip sırasında girişim ihtiyacı, ilk işlem maliyeti ve mortalite açısından anlamlı fark bulundu (P ​​<0.05). Siena EVAR skorunun anlamlı bir öngörücülüğü yoktu (p> 0.05). Sonuç: SGVI skorundaki yüksek riskli bir değer, cerrahı AAA için tedavi seçeneğini yeniden değerlendirmesi için uyarmalıdır. EVAR risk gruplamasına göre, sağlık hizmeti sağlayıcıları ve sosyal güvence sistemi, ilk  işleminlerde daha yüksek bir maliyet ve uzun süreli takip sırasında daha yüksek oranda yeniden girişim ihtiyacı  ve ölüm riskini hesaba katmalıdır .
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Aort Anevrizması, Abdominal; Endovasküler İşlemler, Risk değerlendirmesi, Sağlık masrafları, reoperasyon

Siena and St George Vascular Institute Risk Scoring Systems in Predicting the Cost-Effectiveness of EVAR

Objectives: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a widely used modality in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Siena EVAR and St.George Vascular Institute (SGVI) scores are risk scores to predict possible EVAR related reinterventions. This study was aimed to validate the risk scores and compare the predictivity of the scoring systems for hospital cost-effectiveness in our population.Materials and Methods: 39 patients with unruptured infrarenal AAA, including both elective and non-elective admissions which had a follow-up period from at least 6 months are included in our study. Siena EVAR score and SGVI score are calculated. The relation of the complications (adjuncts at the index operation, reinterventions during follow up), costs (index procedure and overall), aneurysm related mortality are compared among the risk groups.  Results: In our study, SGVI score had a predictivity among high and low-risk groups involving reinterventions during follow up, cost on index operation and mortality (P < 0.05). Siena EVAR score had no significant predictivity (p > 0.05). Conclusion: A high-risk value in SGVI score must warn the surgeon to reassess the treatment option for AAA. If  EVAR is indicated the health care providers and assurance system can count on a higher cost on index operation, a higher risk of reintervention and mortality during long term follow up.
Keywords:

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Endovascular Procedures, risk assesment, Health Care Costs, reoperation,

PDF

___

  • Aytekin, B., Akkaya, B. B., Yılmaz, M., Çetinkaya, F., Salman, N., Ünal, E. U., . . . Özatik, M. A. (2019). Applicability of ASA classification system in elective endovascular aneurysm repair. Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery, 28(2).
  • Best, W. B., Ahanchi, S. S., Larion, S., Ammar, C. P., Lavingia, K. S., & Panneton, J. M. (2016). Abdominal aortic aneurysm anatomic severity grading score predicts implant-related complications, systemic complications, and mortality. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 63(3), 577-584.
  • Bulut, Ö., & Demirağ, M. K. (2013). Short and mid-term quality of life and outcomes following endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 21(3), 639-645.
  • Chaikof, E. L., Dalman, R. L., Eskandari, M. K., Jackson, B. M., Lee, W. A., Mansour, M. A., . . . Nguyen, L. L. (2018). The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 67(1), 2-77. e72.
  • De Bruin, J. L., Karthikesalingam, A., Holt, P. J., Prinssen, M., Thompson, M. M., Blankensteijn, J. D., . . . Buth, J. (2016). Predicting reinterventions after open and endovascular aneurysm repair using the St George's Vascular Institute score. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 63(6), 1428-1433. e1421.
  • Hastaoğlu, İ. O., Toköz, H., Bilginer, N., & Bilgen, F. (2014). Endovasküler stent greft orta dönem sonuçlarımız: Yüksek riskli hastalarda istenilen mortalitenin neresindeyiz? Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, 22(3), 558-563.
  • Hinchliffe, R., Braithwaite, B., & Hopkinson, B. (2003). The endovascular management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 25(3), 191-201.
  • Karthikesalingam, A., Holt, P., Hinchliffe, R., Nordon, I., Loftus, I., & Thompson, M. (2010). Risk of reintervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. British Journal of Surgery, 97(5), 657-663.
  • Karthikesalingam, A., Holt, P., Vidal‐Diez, A., Choke, E., Patterson, B., Thompson, L., . . . Thompson, M. (2013). Predicting aortic complications after endovascular aneurysm repair. British Journal of Surgery, 100(10), 1302-1311.
  • Karthikesalingam, A., Vidal‐Diez, A., De Bruin, J., Thompson, M., Hinchliffe, R., Loftus, I., & Holt, P. (2015). International validation of a risk score for complications and reinterventions after endovascular aneurysm repair. British Journal of Surgery, 102(5), 509-515.
  • Lübke, T., & Brunkwall, J. (2014). [Metaanalysis of EVAR versus open repair for patients undergoing elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms]. Zentralblatt für Chirurgie, 139(5), 552-561. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328356
  • members, A. T. F., Erbel, R., Aboyans, V., Boileau, C., Bossone, E., Bartolomeo, R. D., . . . Frank, H. (2014). 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal, 35(41), 2873-2926.
  • Nilsson, J., Algotsson, L., Hoglund, P., Luhrs, C., & Brandt, J. (2004). EuroSCORE predicts intensive care unit stay and costs of open heart surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 78(5), 1528-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.060
  • Paraskevas, K. I., Bessias, N., Giannoukas, A. D., & Mikhailidis, D. P. (2010). Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures: counterbalancing the benefits with the costs. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 44(4), 319-320.
  • Patel, S. R., Allen, C., Grima, M. J., Brownrigg, J. R., Patterson, B. O., Holt, P. J., . . . Karthikesalingam, A. (2017). A systematic review of predictors of reintervention after EVAR: guidance for risk-stratified surveillance. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 51(6), 417-428.
  • Powell, J. T., Sweeting, M. J., Ulug, P., Blankensteijn, J. D., Lederle, F., Becquemin, J. P., . . . Beard, J. (2017). Meta‐analysis of individual‐patient data from EVAR‐1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. British Journal of Surgery, 104(3), 166-178.
  • Prinssen, M., Wixon, C. L., Buskens, E., & Blankensteijn, J. D. (2004). Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: diagnostics, complications, and associated costs. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 18(4), 421-427.
  • Rutherford, R. B. (2006). Randomized EVAR trials and advent of level I evidence: a paradigm shift in management of large abdominal aortic aneurysms? Paper presented at the Seminars in Vascular Surgery.
  • Sampaio, S. M., Shin, S. H., Panneton, J. M., Andrews, J. C., Bower, T. C., Cherry, K. J., . . . Gloviczki, P. (2009). Intraoperative endoleak during EVAR: frequency, nature, and significance. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 43(4), 352-359.
  • Schanzer, A., & Messina, L. (2012). Two decades of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: enormous progress with serious lessons learned. Journal of the American Heart Association, 1(3), e000075-e000075. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.111.000075
  • Setacci, C., Sirignano, P., Fineschi, V., Frati, P., Ricci, G., & Speziale, F. (2017). A clinical and ethical review on late results and benefits after EVAR. Annals of medicine and surgery, 16, 1-6.
  • Setacci, F., Sirignano, P., Galzerano, G., De, G. D., Ceriello, D., Paroni, G., . . . Setacci, C. (2012). Siena EVAR Score. The Journal of cardiovascular surgery, 53(2), 229-234.
  • Skervin, A. L., Lim, C. S., & Sritharan, K. (2017). Improving Patient Compliance With Post-EVAR Surveillance May Prevent Late Rupture. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 51(7), 522-526.
  • Yazman, S., Yürekli, İ., Yılık, L., Yetkin, U., İner, H., Güneş, T., . . . Gürbüz, A. (2016). Our mid-term results of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 24(2), 274-280.
Sağlık Akademisi Kastamonu-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2016
  • Yayıncı: Esra DEMİRARSLAN
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

KONUŞMA VE SES BOZUKLUKLARINA YOL AÇAN ORAL SEBEPLER

Perihan OYAR

LE FORT I OSTEOTOMİSİNDE İKİ PLAK İLE MAKSİLLER FİKSASYON YÖNTEMİ :TEKNİK RAPOR VE VAKA SUNUMU

Esra BEYLER, Nur ALTIPARMAK

SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN KARİYER PLANLAMAYA YÖNELİK TUTUMLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Serap TORUN, Osman BİLGİN, Sunay FIRAT, M.aykut ERK

Kumlamanın Polietereterketon ve Rezin Siman Bağlantı Dayanımına Etkisi

Meral BAĞKUR, Matlab NADIROV, Cihan AKÇABOY

Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Hasta Güvenliği Ve Tıbbi Hatalar Konusundaki Tutumu

Selda KARAVELİ

EVAR'ın Maliyet Etkinliğini Öngörmede Siena ve St George Vascular Institute Risk Skorlama Sistemleri

Ali Ahmet ARIKAN, Şadan YAVUZ, Kamil Turan BERKİ