Oyundan Öyküye: A Jury of Her Peers'ın Yazar ve Okurları

Bu makalenin amacı, Susan Glaspell’in A Jury of Her Peers adlı öyküsünü okur-odaklı kuram ışığında değerlendirmektir. Okur-odaklı kuram, bir metnin okunmasında ve değerlendirilmesinde okurların aktif katılımcılar olarak önemini vurgular. Bu bakış açısına göre, okuyucu metinden anlam üretmek veya metinleri/mesajları çözümlemekle sorumludur. Bir cinayet hikayesini anlatan A Jury of Her Peers öyküsünün gizemi aktif okurları tarafından çözümlenmeyi beklemektedir. Öykü boyunca hakkında çok tartışmalar yapılan ancak öznel sesini hiç duymad ığımız Minnie Wright, kocasının katili olarak gözaltında tutulmaktadır. Ancak geride bıraktığı eşyaları içerdiği gizli mesajlar ve ve ipuçlarıyla, onu cinayete yönlendiren metinler olarak de ğerlendirilir/okunur. Bu meta-metinler kadın ve erkek karakterler/okurlar tarafından toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine göre okunup değerlendirildiği için metnin okur-odaklı çözümlemesi feminist bir bak ış açısı ile yeni bir anlam kazanır. Öykünün erkek karakterleri durumu ataerkil bakış açıları ve önyargılarıyla ko şullu bir şekilde değerlendirdikleri için ne bir mesaj ne de okunacak bir metin bulabilirler. Ancak Minnie ile empati kurabilen kad ın karakterler tüm ipuçlarını görür, Minnie’nin metninde gizlenmiş mesajları

62-From the Play to the Story: Writers and Readers of A Jury of Her Peers

The purpose of this article is to study Susan Glaspell’s story A Jury of Her Peers from the perspective of the reader-response criticism which emphasizes the significance of the readers as active participants in reading and evaluating a text. In this criticism, the active reader is endowed with the responsibility of generating a message or a meaning from the text. A Jury of Her Peers offers a meta- text of a murder mystery waiting to be solved by its active readers. The absent voice of the story Minnie Wright is suspected of being the murderer of his husband while she leaves behind a series of clues which have to be read as hidden texts with their hidden messages, leading their readers to the motives behind the murder case. As the text is re ad both by male and female characters/readers in relation with their gender roles, a feminist perspective adds a further connotation to the reader- response criticism of the text. Since male characters evaluate th e situation with their prejudices shaped by the priority of a patriarchal perspective, they cannot read the hidden messages. Yet, they even cannot find a text to be read. However, female characters identifying themselves with Minnie are capable of finding all the clues and reading al l the messages hidden in the text of Minnie. And they solve the mystery of the crime. Hence, they not only celebrate their common membership in sisterhood but they also experience a transformation towards their autonomous selves.

PDF

___

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder. Manual 5 (DSM-5) Washington, London: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Barthes, R. (1988). The Death of the Reader. In Lodge D. (Ed.), Modern Criticism and Theory – A Reader. London:Longman, 145-150.
Bigsby, C.W.E. (2000). Introduction. In Bigsby, C.W.E. (Ed.), Plays by Susan Glaspell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-31.
Brooker, P. & Selden, R. & Widdowson, P. (1997). A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. London & New York& Toronto: Prentice Hall.
Carruth, A. & Logan, C. (2002) Depressive Symptoms in Farm Women: Effects of Health Status and Framing LifeStyle Characteristics, Behaviors and Beliefs. In Journal of Community Health. Vol. 27, No.3, 213-228.
Chinoy, H. K. & Jenkins L. W. (1981). Women in American Theater. Lexington & New York: Crown Publishers.
Fetterley, J. (1986). Reading about Reading: ‘A Jury of Her Peers’, ‘The Murders in the Rue Morgue’ and ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’. In Flynn, E. & Schweickart, P. (Ed.), Gender and Reading - Essays on Readers, Texts and Contexts. John Hopkins University Press, 147-164.
Glaspell, S. (1918). A Jury of Her Peers . Every Week. Crowell Publishing Company. 1-11. Nmi.org/wp.content/uploads/2015/01/1345.pdf
Hedges, E. (2002). Small Things Reconsidered, A Jury of Her Peers. In Ben-Zvi, L. (Ed.), Susan Glaspell – Essays on her Theater and Fiction. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 49-70.
Hirsch, E.D. (1988). Faulty Perspectives. In Lodge, D. (Ed.). Modern Criticism and Theory – A Reader. London: Longman, 230-240.
Iser, W. (1988). The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach. In Lodge, D. (Ed.). Modern Criticism and Theory – A Reader. London: Longman, 188-205.
Schwarz, D. (1994). The Dead –James Joyce. Boston & New York: MacMillan Press Ltd.
Sözalan, Ö. (2006). The Stage in the Text - Essays on American Drama. İstanbul: Okuyan Us Yayın.