___

• American Library Association. (1989). Presidential committee on information literacy: Final report (Chicago: American Library Association). Available at http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential (accessed 3 July, 2016).
• American Library Association. (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (Chicago: American Library Association). Available at http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed 26 November, 2016).
• Asher, A. D., Duke, L. M., & Wilson, S. (2013). Paths of discovery: Comparing the search effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and conventional library resources. College & Research Libraries, 74 (5), 464–488.
• Becker, C. H. Jr. (2009). Student values and research: Are millennials really changing the future of reference and research? Journal of Library Administration, 49(4), 341-364.
• Bloom, B., & Deyrup, M. (2015). The SHU research logs: Student behaviors trans-scripted. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41 (5), 593-601.
• Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 487–508.
• Bruce, C. (2004). Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change: A background paper. In P. A. Danaher (Eds.), Proceedings Lifelong learning: Whose responsibility and what is your contribution?, The 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference (pp. 8-19). Queensland: Central Queensland University Press. Available at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4977/1/4977_1.pdf (accessed 3 July, 2016).
• Bruce, C., & Chesterton, P. (2002). Constituting collective consciousness: Information literacy in university curricula. International Journal for Academic Development, 7 (1), 31-40.
• Bullard, J. E. (1998). Raising awareness of local agenda 21: The use of Internet resources. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (2), 201-210.
• Burton, V.T., & Chadwick, S.A. (2000). Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use and criteria for use of internet and library sources. Computers and Composition, 17 (3), 309-328.
• Castleford, J., & Robinson, G. (1998). Evaluating IT-based resources for supporting learning and teaching in geography: Some case studies. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (3), 375-381.
• Chrisman, N. R., & Harvey, F. J. (1998). Extending the classroom: Hypermedia-supported learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (1), 11-18.
• Connaway, L. S., Dickey, T. J, & Radford, M. L. (2011). If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it: Convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Library and Information Science Research, 33 (3), 179-190.
• Connaway, L. S., White, D., Lanclos, D., & Le Cornu, A. (2013). Visitors and residents: What motivates engagement with the digital information environment? Information Research, 18 (1). Available at http://www.informationr.net/ir/18-1/paper556.html#.WJIq8PkrLIU (accessed 1 February 2017).
• Currie, L., Devlin, F., Emde, J., & Graves, K. (2010). Undergraduate search strategies and evaluation criteria: Searching for credible sources. New Library World, 111 (3/4), 113- 124.
• Dilevko, J., & Gottlieb, L. (2002). Print sources in an electronic age: a vital part of the research process for undergraduate students. The Journal of Academic librarianship, 28 (6), 381- 392.
• Ebersole, S.E. (2005). On their own: students’ academic use of the commercialized web. Library Trends, 53 (4), 530-538.
• Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57 (1), 163-173.
• Eynon, R. (2005). The use of the internet in higher education: Academics’ experiences of using ICTs for teaching and learning. Aslib proceedings, 57 (2), 168-180.
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzge, M. J. (2010). Kids and credibility: An empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information credibility. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Gardner, A. (2003). Discovering networked information in the internet age: The JISC resource guide to geography & the environment. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27 (1), 103-107.
• Goett, J. A., & Foote, K. E. (2000). Cultivating student research and study skills in web-based learning environments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24 (1), 92-99.
• Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2009). What today’s college students say about conducting research in the digital age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report. (Seattle: The Information School, University of Washington). Available at http://www.projectinfolit.org/uploads/2/7/5/4/27541717/2009_final_report.pdf (accessed 29 January, 2017).
• Hsu, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-J., Hou, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Epistemic beliefs, online search strategies, and behavioral patterns while exploring socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23 (3), 471-480.
• Jo, I., Hong, J. E., & Verma, K. (2016). Facilitating spatial thinking in world geography using Web-based GIS. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40 (3), 442-459.
• Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2003). Information literacy in higher education: A review and case study. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (3), 335-352.
• Joo, S., & Choi, N. (2015). Factors affecting undergraduates' selection of online library resources in academic tasks: Usefulness, ease-of-use, resource quality, and individual differences. Library Hi Tech, 33 (2), 272-291.
• Julien, H., & Barker, S. (2009). How high school students evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library and Information Science Research, 31 (1), 12–17.
• Kim, K.-S., & S.-C. J. Sin. (2007). Perception and selection of information sources by undergraduate students: Effects of avoidant style, confidence, and personal control in problem-solving. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33 (6), 655-665.
• Kirkwood, A. (2008). Getting it from the web: Why and how online resources are used by independent undergraduate learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24 (5), (378-382).
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses?. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (3), 257-274.
• Klein, P. (2003). Active learning strategies and assessment in world geography classes. Journal of Geography, 102 (4), 146-157.
• Kolowich, S. (2011). What students don't know. Inside Higher Ed. Available at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/08/22/erial_study_of_student_research_habit s_at_illinois_university_libraries_reveals_alarmingly_poor_information_literacy_and_ski lls (accessed 1 February 2017).
• Lee, J. Y., Han, S., & Joo, S. (2008). The analysis of the information users’ needs and information seeking behavior in the field of science and technology. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25 (2), 127-141.
• Lee, J. Y., Paik, W., & Joo, S. (2012). Information resource selection of undergraduate students in academic search tasks. Information Research, 17(1), paper511. Available at http://www.informationr.net/ir/17-1/paper511.html (accessed 3 July, 2016).
• Leeder, C., & Shah, C. (2016). Practicing critical evaluation of online sources improves student search behavior. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42 (4), 459-468.
• Maloney, E. (2007). What web 2.0 can teach us about learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53 (18), B26.
• McDowell, L. (2002). Electronic information resources in undergraduate education: an exploratory study of opportunities for student learning and independence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (3), 255-266.
• McMillan, S. J., & Morrison, M. (2006). Coming of age with the internet: A qualitative exploration of how the internet has become an integral part of young people’s lives. New Media Society, 8 (1), 73-95.
• McMorrow, J. (2005). Using a web-based resource to prepare students for fieldwork: Evaluating the Dark Peak virtual tour. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29 (2), 223-240.
• Newnham, R., Mather, A., Grattan, J., Holmes, A., & Gardner, A. (1998). An evaluation of the use of Internet sources as a basis for geography coursework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (1), 19-34.
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9 (5), 1-6.
• Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership, 63 (4), 8-13.
• Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry. Computers & Education, 59 (1), 82– 94.
• Reed, M., & Mitchell, B. (2001). Using information technologies for collaborative learning in geography: a case study from Canada. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25 (3), 321-339.
• Rees, P. W., & Legates, M. (2013). Returning “region” to world regional geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37 (3), 327–349.
• Ritter, M. E., & Lemke, K. A. (2000). Addressing the ‘seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education’ with internet-enhanced education. Journal of geography in Higher Education, 24 (1), 100-108.
• Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntington, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., & Withey, R. (2008). The Google generation: The information behaviour of the researcher of the future. ASLIB Proceedings, 60 (4), 290–310.
• Saunders, L. (2012). Faculty perspectives on information literacy as a student learning outcome. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38 (4), 226-236.
• Selwyn, N. (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates’ academic use of the internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9 (1), 11-22.
• Solem, M. N. (2000). The virtual geography department: Assessing an agent of change in geography education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24 (3), 353-364.
• Steinberg, P. E., Walter, A., & Sherman-Morris, K. (2002). Using the internet to integrate thematic and regional approaches in geographic education. The Professional Geographer, 54 (3), 332-348.
• Stewart, M., Stott, T., & Nuttall, A. M. (2011). Student engagement patterns over the duration of level 1 and level 3 geography modules: influences on student attendance, performance and use of online resources. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35 (1), 47-65.
• Taffs, K. H., & Holt, J. I. (2013). Investigating student use and value of e-learning resources to develop academic writing within the discipline of environmental science. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37 (4), 500-514.
• Taylor, A. (2012). A study of the information search behaviour of the millennial generation. Information Research, 17 (1), paper 508. Available at http://www.informationr.net/ir/17- 1/paper508.html (accessed 22 November, 2016).
• Taylor, A., & Dalal, H. A. (2014). Information literacy standards and the world wide web: Results from a student survey on evaluation of internet information sources. Information Research, 19(4). Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1050475 (accessed 1 February 2017).
• Thomas, N. P. (2004). Information literacy and information skills instruction: Applying research to practice in The School Library Media Center (2nd ed.). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
• Tomaiuolo, N. G. (2005). Faculty views of open web resource use by college students. The Journal of academic librarianship, 31 (6), 559-566.
• Tsai, M.-J., Hsu, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Investigation of high school students’ online science information searching performance: The role of implicit and explicit strategies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21 (2), 246-254.
• Weiler, A. (2005). Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31 (1), 46-53.
• Wong, D. (1998). Creating a web-based electronic reserve library for teaching world regional geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (2), 257-262.
• Xie, I., & Joo, S. (2009). Selection of information sources: Types of tasks, accessibility and familiarity of sources. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46 (1), 1-18.