EXAMINATION OF THE EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL INNOVATION BY THE SCIENCE MAPPING METHOD

Purpose-  The main objective of this study is to investigate the evolution of the concept of social innovation from 1966 to the present day.  Methodology- Bibliometric analysis enables researchers to examine statistically the country, author(s), cooperation among authors, citations, institutions, and published years of selected publications and to put forward the general structure of a certain discipline using obtained statistical findings. On the other hand, scientific mappling analysis is a method that concentrates on determining the evolution of a scientific field and its constrained scientific areas. In order to better understand how the evolution of the concept of social innovation changes and develops during the sample period, firstly, a bibliometric and secondly a scientific mapping analysis were performed and the findings were interpreted.   Findings- SciMAT package program was used to perform scientific mapping analysis. Results reveal that there are 1,428 publications concentrating social innovation under Scopus database, while 58.1% (830) of them were articles, 16% (229) of them were conference papers, 11.2% (160) of them were book chapters and the rest of them was other publications.  Conclusion- A thematic change was generally found for the concept of social innovation for the sample period of 1966-2016. The corresponding thematic change was generally evolved by the prominence and the decline of some associated scientific areas.  

___

  • Adams, D., Hess, M., 2010, “Social innovation and why it has policy significance”. Econ. Labour Relat. Rev. 21, 139–156.
  • Cobo, M. J. ve López-Herrera, A. G. and Herrera-V.,E, 2015, “A Relational Database Model for Science Mapping Analysis”, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 12, No. 6, pp.43-62.
  • Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F.2012, “SciMAT: A New Science Mapping Analysis Software Tool”, Journal Of The Amerıcan Socıety For Informatıon Scıence And Technology, 63(8):1609–1630.
  • Eren, H, 2010, “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Yenilikçilik Kapasitelerinin Teknolojik Yenilikçilik Eğilimlerine Etkisini Ölçmeye Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi,” Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü Teknoloji Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi,
  • Halaç, D. S., Eren H., Bulut Ç. 2014, “Sosyal Yenilikçilik: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması”, H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 165-190.
  • Hernandez, Y. Cormican, K. 2016, “Towards the Effective Management of Social Innovation Projects: Insights from Project Management” Procedia Computer Science 100, pp.237 – 243
  • Kazançoğlu İ. ve Dirsehan T., 2016, “Sosyal İnovasyon ile Sakin Şehirlerarasındaki İlişkinin Sosyal Girişimciler Açısından İncelenmesi: Seferihisar Örneği,” Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi Cilt 7, Özel Sayı, ss.135-161.
  • Mónica L. A.; Jadraque Gago, Eulalia; María Dolores Martínez Aires,María Martínez Rojas, 2015, “Musculoskeletal Dısorders Research Evolutıon In Constructıon: A Bıblıometrıc Analysıs,” 19th International Congress on Project Management and Engineering Granada, 15-17th July, 2257-2266.
  • Mumford, M. D. 2002, “Social Innovation: Ten Cases From Benjamin Franklin,” Creativity Research Journal, 14:2, 253-266, DOI: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_11
  • Nicholls, A. Dees, J. G.2015, “International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences” (Second Edition), Pages 355-361
  • Özdemir F., Ar. İ. M. 2015, “Sosyal Yenilik Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması”,Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi Cilt/Volume 4 | Sayı/Issue 1 | Haziran/June , ss.17-43.
  • Saka, A. ve Igamı M. 2007, “Mapping Modern Science Using Co-citation Analysis,” 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV'07), pp.1-6.
  • Santana G. C. 2014, “Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change Vol.82, pp.42–51
  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1942, “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy”, New York, Harper&Row.
  • Simms, J.R. 2006, “Technical and Social Innovation Determinants of Behavior”, Systems Research & Behavioral Science, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp. 383–393.
  • Small, H. 1997, “Update On Scıence Mappıng: Creatıng Large Document Spaces,” Scientometric, Vol. 38, No. 2, 275-293. Şener S,; Sarıdoğan E., “The Effects Of Science-Technology-Innovation On Competitiveness And Economic Growth”, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 24 (2011) 815–828. Van Raan, A. F.J. (2014) Advances İn Bibliometric Analysis: Research Performance Assessment And Science Mapping, http://www.portlandpress.com/pp/books/online/wg87/087/0017/0870017.pdf pp 17-28