___

• American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat.115, 516 (Feb. 19, 2009).
• Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems in Abelson, R., Aronson, E., McGuire, W.J., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, M.J. & Tannebaum, P.H. (Eds.). Cognitive consistency theories: A source book (pp. 5-27). Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
• Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20.
• Blacklock, K. (2002). Dealing with an incompetent teacher. Principal, 81(4), 26-28. Retrieved from http://www.naesp.org/principal-archives
• Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2003). The phenomenology of principal mistreatment: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(4), 367-422.
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Bossert, S.T., Dwyer, D.C., Rowan, B., & Lee, G.V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34–64.
• Bullmaster-Day, M. L. (2011). Let the learner do the learning: What we know about effective teaching. New York: Touro College, Lander Center for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://gse.touro.edu/research--outreach/resources--development/ literature-reviews/
• Callahan, K, & Sadeghi, L. (2014). TEACHNJ: An evaluation of two years of implementation. US-China Education Review A, 4(10), 728–736.
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
• Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., & Antoniou, P. (2013). Teacher professional development for improving quality of teaching. New York, NY: Springer.
• Cunningham, W. G., & Cordeiro, P. A. (2013). Educational leadership: A bridge to improved practice. (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Falk, B. (2013). Teacher learning: How student-performance assessments can support teacher learning. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
• Darling-Hammond, L. & McLaughlin, M.W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phil Delta Kappan, 92(6), 81-92.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R.C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning professional status report on teacher development in the U. S. and abroad: Technical report. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council. Retrieved from http://learningforward.org/docs/pdf/nsdcstudytechnicalreport2009.pdf?sfvrsn=0
• deMarrais, K. (2004). Qualitative interview studies: Learning through experience. In K. de Marrais & S. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 51-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Desimone, L. M. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68–71.
• Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/documents/ESSA_Progress_Report.pdf
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: University of Stanford Press.
• Fuhr, D. (1990). Supervising the marginal teacher: Here’s how. National Association of Elementary Teachers, 9(2), 1–4.
• Gall, M. D., & Acheson, K. A. (2010). Clinical supervision and teacher development (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
• Glatthorn, A. A. (1997). Differentiated supervision (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2014). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500.
• Hallinger, P.,&Heck, R. (2010) Collaborative leadership and school improvement: understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning, School Leadership and Management 30(2), 95-110.
• Hyener, R. H. (1985). Some guidlines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8(3), 279-303.
• Jackson, C. M. (1997). Assisting marginal teachers: A training model. Principal, 77(1), 28-30.
• Kimball, S. M., & Milanowski, A. (2009). Examining teacher evaluation validity and leadership decision making within a standards-based evaluation system. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(1), 34-70.
• Kyriakides, L., Demetriou, D., & Charlambous C. (2006). Generating criteria for evaluating teachers through teacher effectiveness research. EducationalResearch, 48(1), 1–20.
• Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Retrieved from www .wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/documents/how-leadership-influences-student-learning.pdf
• Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. Retrieved from www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school- leadership/key-research/Documents/Investigating-the-Links-to- Improved-Student-Learning.pdf
• Lawrence, C. E., Vachon, M. K., Leake, D. O., & Leake, B. H. (1993). The marginal teacher: A step-by-step guide to fair procedures for identification and dismissal. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
• Little, O., Goe, L., & Bell, C. (2009). A practical guide to evaluating teacher effectiveness. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/practicalGuide.pdf
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Marks, H.M., & Printy, S.M. (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.
• Maxwell, J. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Mead, S., Rotherman, A., & Brown, R. (2012). The hangover: Thinking about the unintended consequences of the Nation’s teacher evaluation binge. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Retrieved from https://www.aei.org/
• McLeod, S. A. (2014). Cognitive dissonance. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/cognitive-dissonance.html
• Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• National Policy Board for Educational Administration (2015). Professional Standards for Educational Leaders 2015. Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.npbea.org/
• Nolan, J., Jr., & Hoover, L. A. (2011). Teacher supervision and evaluation: Theory into practice (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• O’Keefe, D.J. (1990), Persuasion: Theory and Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Ponticell, J.A., & Zepeda, S.J. (2004). Confronting well-learned lessons in supervision and evaluation. The NASSP Bulletin, 88(639), 43-59.
• Popham, W. J. (2013). On serving two masters: Formative and summative evaluation. Principal Leadership, 13(7), 18–22.
• Rice, J. K. (2010). Principal effectiveness and leadership in an era of accountability: What research says. Retrieved from National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Educational Research (CALDER) www.caldercenter.org/upload/CALDER-Research-and-Policy-Brief-8.pdf
• Schooling, P., Toth, M., & Marzano, R. J. (2010). Creating an aligned system to develop teachers within the federal Race to the Top initiative [White paper]. Englewood, CO: Marzano Research Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.marzanoresearch.com/ free_resources/selected_research.aspx
• Sergiovanni, T. (1994) Building community in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Smith, R. E. (2008). Human resources administration: A school-based perspective (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (2rd ed.). (pp. 445-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Stronge, J. H. (2010). Effective teachers = student achievement: What the research says. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
• Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2013). Supervision that improves teaching: Strategies and techniques (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Timperley, H. (2008). National education findings of assess to learn (AtoL) report. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Toch, T., & Rothman, R. (2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education. Washington, DC: Education Sector at the American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from https://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/charter_schools/research/ Administrator/Rush%20to%20Judgement%20Teacher%20Evaluation.pdf
• Tucker, P. (2001). Helping struggling teachers. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 52-55.
• U.S. Department of Education. (2004). New No Child Left Behind flexibility: Highly qualified teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html
• U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top program executive summary. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executivesummary.pdf
• Wallace Foundation. (2013). The school principal as leader: Guiding schools to better teaching and learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation. Author.
• Waters, J.T., & Marzano, R.J., & McNulty, B. (2004). Leadership that sparks learning. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 48-51.
• Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Kelling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness (2nd ed.). Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project. Retrieved from http://tntp.org/assets/ documents/TheWidgetEffect_2nd_ed.pdf
• Wood, F.H., & Killian, J.E. (1998). Job-embedded learning makes the difference in school improvement. Journal of Staff Development, 19(1), 52–54.
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Zepeda, S.J. (2006). Cognitive dissonance, supervision, and administrative team conflict.The International Journal of Educational Management, 20(3), 224-233.
• Zepeda, S.J. (2016). The leaders guide to working with underperforming teachers: Overcoming marginal teaching and getting results. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Zepeda, S.J. (2015). Job-embedded professional development: Support, collaboration, and learning in schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Zepeda, S.J., Jimenez, A., & Lanoue, P.D. (2015). New practices for a new day: Principal professional development to support learning cultures in schools. LEARNing Landscapes, 9(1), 303-319.
• Zepeda, S., & Ponticell, J. (1998). At cross-purposes: What do teachers need, want, and get from supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14(1), 68-87.