The notion of Charter Schools and Its Feasibility in Turkey

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of Charter School system in Turkey, which was opened firstly in State of Minnesota of United States and was expanded to approximately 40 states in America today and also, in practice in some countries such as Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Sweden and Norway. Charter Schools are educational institutes that can be opened by signing a contract between a country’s institution responsible for education and a person or a group who wants to be responsible for the management of this school. This system was based on performance and accountability and pursued more competitive and innovative goals. Moreover, Charter Schools put emphasis on democracy and equality in education by being free, addressing to all students living in the region where school was located and considering individual differences and diversity on behalf of students. Eight volunteering faculty members were chosen by criterion sampling who were working in the field of Educational Sciences of universities in Turkey. Interviews were conducted with participants who were informed about the structure and operation of this system in advance. The results of the study suggested that Charter Schools were advantageous in terms of individualism, diversity and flexible curriculum though flexible curriculum, monitoring and audition process could lead to some problems when it was practiced in Turkey.

Keywords:

Charter Schools public schools, private schools,

PDF

___

Al, Hamza. (2014). Eğitim Hizmetlerinin Sunumunda Yönetişim Arayışları: Charter Yöntemi. [A search for governance in educational services]. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 9:1, 127-136.
Al, Hamza. (2013). Eğitim Yönetiminde Charter Modeli ve Türkiye’de Uygulanabilirliği. [ Charter Model In the Management of Education And its Applicability in Turkey]. Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, 4, 23-40.
Akyüz, Y. (2013). Türk Eğitim Tarihi: M.Ö. 1000-M.S.2013 [The History of Turkish Education: B.C.1000-A.D.2013]. Pegem Akademi.
Budde, R. (1988). Education by Charter: Restructuring School Districts. Key to Long-Term Continuing Improvement in American Education. The Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvementof the Northeast & Islands. Massachusetts:U.S.A
Bowles, S. (2014). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Haymarket Books. U.S.A
Chen, G. (2014). What is a Charter School? Retrieved from http://www.publicschoolreview.com/blog/what-is-a-charter-school
Gawlik, M. A. (2012). Moving Beyond the Rhetoric: Charter School Reform and Accountability. The Journal of Educational Research, 105:3, 210-219, DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2011.559492.
Hill, P. T., & Lake, R. J. (2004). Charter schools and accountability in public education. Brookings Institution Press.
Kahlenberg, R. D. (2008). The Charter School Idea Turns 20: A History of Evolution and Role Reversals. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/03/26/29kahlenberg_ep.h27.html
Kamienski, A. (2011). Competition: Charter and Public Elementary Schools in Chicago. Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform, 5:2, 161-181, DOI: 10.1080/15582159.2011.576573.
Kolderie, T. (2008). How the idea of ‘chartering’ schools came about: What role did the Citizens League play? Minnesota Journal. Retrieved from http://www.educationevolving.org/pdf/Origins-of-Chartering-Citizens-LeagueRole.pdf
Konan, N. (2002). Türkiye Eğitim Sisteminin Yapısı.[The structure of Turkish Education System] Erdal Toprakçı (Ed.), in Eğitim Üzerine (p. 265-290). Ütopya.
Lee, J. (2014). The Mechanism of State Charter School Policy Adoption: The Case of American States. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 20-34, doi:10.1080/01900692.2013.809589
Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C., Weitzel, P. (2009). School Choice and Competitive Incentives: Mapping the Distribution of Educational Opportunities across Local Education Markets. American Journal of Education, 115, 601-647.
Merriam, S.B. (2013). Nitel Araştırma: Desen ve Uygulama için bir Rehber [Qualitative Research: A guide for design and implementation]. Ankara: NOBEL.
Minnesota Legislative Reference Library (2014). Resources on Minnesota Issues: Charter Schools. Retrieved from http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/issues/issues.aspx?issue=charter
Miron, G., & Nelson, C. (2002). What’s public about charter schools: Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
No Children Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 2204 (2002).
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (p. 238). California: SAGE.
The Office of the Revisor of the Statues, 1991 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 265-H.F.No. 700. Retrieved from https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/?id=265&year=1991&type=0 United Federation of Teachers, UFT History, Albert Shanker. Retrieved from http://www.uft.org/who-we-are/history/albert-shanker
U.S. Department of Education. Laws & Guidance. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/landing.jhtml?src=rt
Üstün, A. (2002). Eğitimin Ekonomik Temelleri. [The economic foundations of education]. Erdal Toprakçı (Ed.),in Eğitim Üzerine (p. 241-264). Ütopya.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek. H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. [qualitativeresearch techniques in social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin.

Participatory Educational Research-Cover

ISSN: 2148-6123
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2014
Yayıncı: Özgen KORKMAZ

Arşiv