Primary School Teachers’ Perceptions of School Report

School report is a document prepared by a teacher to follow up and evaluate a student’s progress in lessons throughout a certain educational period. It is also an academic tool that allows the student and parents to be informed about the progress during that time and to see the shortcomings and to take the necessary precautions. The main objective of school report is not to show students’ scores or to determine whether they have passed a lesson, but rather, to give information about their current state, to manage their skills by taking their differences into account, to guide them according to their interests, needs and skills, to determine the difficulties and deficiencies they come up against throughout the learning process and to help do away with them.  However, if a school report is only considered in terms of scores and so becomes an indicator of students’ success or failure, taking the report as a reference, the students whose report shows them successful might consider themselves more accepted, more important and valuable. Those with lower academic success, on the other hand, are naturally driven into a defensive psychology, which causes serious problems because the report has become the main target and is only assessed in terms of scores. The fault of parents and teachers to regard school report as an aim to achieve affects students negatively in many ways and might cause psychological problems in them in the short term. Perspectives arising from wrong responses, worries and fears, comparisons, high expectations, attributing failure to personality, critics without thinking, weathering and unnecessary rewards or punishments once again reveal the importance of school report worry. The research aims to reveal how primary school teachers, the first step of teaching, perceive school report. Teacher’s perception of school report is the variable playing a fundamental role in shaping both student’s and parents’ definition of and expectations from school report. The research encompasses 190 primary school teachers in the city of Kütahya. According to the research results, 62,6% of the teachers think that school report shows the lessons the students are good at and 61,6% think that school report shows the lessons the students are deficient in and their academic progress while 59,5% consider it only as a tool. The teachers don’t consider school report as a means of punishment and as the determiner of personality, and they think that it shouldn’t be a source of honor or shame. The findings show that primary school teachers’ perceptions of school report are mostly positive in favor of students. In this respect, it can be said that they perceive school report relevantly to its purpose. Regardless of the age group of the students, not turning the repot period into a trauma is based upon not only teachers’ but also parents and students’ perception of school report. Primary school teachers should reflect their perceptions of school report to students and parents and should also tell them that school reports are only a route map involving certain indicators in the early period and that all students are precious regardless of their reports. As regards to the school aspect, counsellors should explain the purpose of school report to teachers, parents and students and should provide the required guidance and warnings. When media is considered, the traditional school report understanding should be evaded and by sensitively planning the stress factors of school report like report festivals, awards and ads, it should be reiterated that school report is a documentation of students’ mean scores.  With the cooperation between the Directorates of National Education and Education Faculties, preservice teachers should be provided such training during theoretical and practical applications of assessment and evaluation lessons that shows school report as a tool depending on a process, uses scientific assessment and evaluation arguments, and gives priority to student psychology and health. Perceptions of students and parents about school report should be researched. School reports that don’t only provide quantitative information but also give student success and success areas prominence should be designed; that is, as well as academic scores, school reports should also involve student success, areas requiring progress, parents’ roles in teaching process, what students will/should do at school, statistical graphs showing previous success levels, in-class success, expected success levels, thoughts of the teacher, student and parents, study habits, target and suggestions

___

  • Acar, M. & Anıl, D. (2009). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Performans Değerlendirme Sürecindeki Değerlendirme Yöntemlerini Kullanabilme Yeterlikleri, Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar Ve Çözüm Önerileri [Proficiency of Primary School Teachers in Using Assessment Methods during Performance Assessment Process, Problems They Encounter and Suggestions for Solution]. TUBAV Journal of Science, Vol:2, No:3, 354-363.
  • Akbaba, Altun, S. (2009). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarısızlıklarına İlişkin Veli, Öğretmen Ve Öğrenci Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi [Analysis of Parents, Teacher and Student’s Opinions about Academic Failure of Primary School Students]. Primary Education Online, 8(2), 567-586. [Online]: Http://İlkogretim-Online.Org.Tr
  • Anıl, D. & Acar, M. (2008). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Ölçme Değerlendirme Sürecinde Karşılaştıkları Sorunlara İlişkin Görüşleri [Opinions of Primary School Teachers about The Problems They Encounter during Evaluation and Assessment Process]. 100th Year University, Journal of Education Faculty. December 2008. Vol:V, No:II, 44-61. Http://Efdergi.Yyu.Edu.Tr
  • Çakan, M, (2004). Öğretmenlerin Ölçme-Değerlendirme Uygulamaları Ve Yeterlik Düzeyleri: İlk Ve Ortaöğretim [Evaluation and Assessment Practices of Teachers and Their Proficiency Levels: Primary and Secondary Education]. Ankara University Journal of Education Faculty, 37(2), 99-114.
  • Çelenk, S. (2003). Okul Başarısının Ön Koşulu: Okul Aile Dayanışması [Prerequisite for School Success: School-Parents Cooperation]. Primary Education-Online 2 (2), 28-34. Http://Www.İlkogretim-Online.Org.Tr
  • Çil, A. Ders Başarısı Mı, Sosyal Başarı Mı? Karnelerin Görünmez/Görünemez Yüzü [Course Success or Social Success? Unseen Face of School Reports]. Http://Www.Kariyerpenceresi.Com/?Rehberlik,111/Ders-Basarisi-Mi-Sosyal-Basari-Mi.Html Accessed on 8th October 2015
  • Çoklar, A. N., Vural, L. and Şahin, Y. L. (2009). Öğretmen Adaylarının Uygulayabilecekleri Ölçme-Değerlendirme Yaklaşımları İle Ölçme-Değerlendirme Amaçlı Teknoloji Kullanım Özyeterlikleri [Evaluation and Assessment Approaches Prospective Teachers Can Practice and Their Self-Efficacy in Using Technology for Evaluation and Assessment]. Adıyaman University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, Year: 2, No: 3, S. 35-54.
  • Duban, N. & Küçükyılmaz, E. A. (2008). Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Alternatif Ölçme- Değerlendirme Yöntem Ve Tekniklerinin Uygulama Okullarında Kullanımına İlişkin Görüşleri [Opinions of Prospective Primary School Teachers about the Use of Alternative Evaluation and Assessment Methods and Techniques in Practice Schools]. Primary Teaching Online, 7(3), 769-784. [Online]: Http://İlkogretim-Online.Org.Tr
  • Gelbal, S. & Kelecioğlu, H. (2007). Öğretmenlerin Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri Hakkındaki Yeterlik Algıları Ve Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar [Proficiency Perceptions of Teachers about Evaluation and assessment Methods and Problems They Encounter]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education 33: 135-145.
  • Gök, B, & Şahin, E, A, (2009). İlköğretim 4 Ve 5. Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Değerlendirme Araçlarını Çoklu Kullanımı Ve Yeterlik Düzeyleri [4th and 5th Classes’ Primary School Teachers’ Multiple Use of Assessment Instruments and Their Proficiency Levels]. Education and Science, 34,(153), 127-143.
  • Kabapınar, Y. & Ataman, M. (2010). İlköğretim Sosyal Bilgiler (4-5. Sınıf) Programları’ndaki Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme Yöntemlerine İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri [Teachers’ Opinions about Evaluation and Assessment Methods in Primary Education Social Studies (4th-5th Classes) Program]. Primary Education Online, 9(2), 776-791. [Online]: Http://İlkogretim-Online.Org.Tr
  • Kuran, K, & Kanatlı, F, (2009). Alternatif Ölçme Değerlendirme Teknikleri Konusunda Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi [Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions about Alternative Evaluation and Assessment Techniques]. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 6(12), 209-234.
  • MEB, (2014). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Okul Öncesi Eğitim Ve İlköğretim Kurumları Yönetmeliği [Ministry of National Education’s Regulation of Institutes of Pre-School and Primary Education]. Official Gazette, No, 29072.
  • Özdemir, S. M. (2010). İlköğretim Öğretmenlerinin Alternatif Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme Araçlarına İlişkin Yeterlikleri Ve Hizmet İçi Eğitim İhtiyaçları [Proficiency of Primary School Teachers in Alternative Evaluation and Assessment Instruments & Their In-service Training Needs]. Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, Fall 2010, 8(4), 787-816.