Sümeyye YAŞAR, Neslihan MANAV DEMİR, Elif Burcu ATÇI, Selami DEMİR

Bir AO prosesinde reaktörlerin hidrolik bekletme sürelerinin fosfor giderim verimi üzerindeki etkilerinin modelleme yoluyla incelenmesi

Bu çalışmada, bir kuramsal anaerobik-oksik (AO) prosesinde reaktörlerin hidrolik bekletme sürelerinin (HRT) fosfor giderimi üzerindeki etkilerinin bir aktif çamur modeli kullanılarak simülasyonuna ilişkin bir çalışmanın sonuçları sunulmuştur. Simülasyonlar, C/P oranları sırasıyla 100/1.0, 100/1.5 ve 100/2.0 değerlerine karşılık gelen düşük, orta ve güçlü giriş fosfor yüklerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Giriş fosfor yüklerinin her biri için 0.125 ile 0.625 arasında değişen anaerobik hacim fraksiyonlarında (AHF) denemeler yapılarak HRT değişimi için prosesin tepkisi incelenmiştir. Ayrıca, kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı (KOİ), toplam azot (TN), toplam fosfor (TP), ve askıda katı madde (AKM) için giderim verimleri de hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmada, 100/1.0, 100/1.5 ve 100/2.0 giriş C/P oranlarındaki en yüksek KOİ giderim verimleri 0.250 AHF'de %91.8 (100/2.0 ve 100/1.5 için) ve 0.125 ile 0.250 AHF'de %91.7 olarak belirlenmiştir. Tüm giriş fosfor yükleri için en yüksek TN giderim verimi 0.625 AHF'de %56.3, en yüksek AKM giderim verimi ise 0.125 AHF'de %93.3 olarak hesaplanmıştır. En yüksek TP giderim verimleri 100/1.0, 100/1.5 ve 100/2.0 giriş C/P oranları için sırasıyla %92.8, %90.8 ve %86.2 olarak, 0.375 AHF'de gözlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, toplam fosfor (TP) giderim veriminin giriş C/P oranı ve anaerobik hacim fraksiyonuna (AHF) bağlı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bunlarda AHF'nin etkisi daha baskındır. Etkin fosfor giderimi için AHF'nin 0.250 ile 0.375 arasında tutulması uygun olacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Aktif çamur modeli, AO prosesi, Reaktör hacimleri, Fosfor giderimi

Model-Based investigation of the effects of reactors’ hydraulic retention times on phosphorus removal efficiency in an AO process

This study presents the results of a simulation work performed using an activated sludge model to investigate the effects of reactors’ hydraulic retention times (HRT) on phosphorus removal in a hypothetical anaerobic-oxic (AO) process. The simulations were performed for low, medium, and high influent phosphorus loads corresponding to influent C/P ratios of 100/1.0, 100/1.5, 100/2.0. For each of influent phosphorus loads, various anaerobic volume fractions (AVF) between 0.125 and 0.625 were used to test the response of the process that was investigated as a result of the change in hydraulic retention times. Additionally, removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and total suspended solids (TSS) were also calculated. As a result of the study, maximum COD removal efficiencies for 100/2.0, 100/1.5 and 100/1.0 influent C/P ratios were determined as 91.8% for 0.250 AVF (for 100/2.0 and 100/1.5), and 91.7% for both 0.125 and 0.250 AVF, respectively. In all influent C/P ratios, the maximum TN removal efficiency was determined as 56.3% at 0.625 AVF, and the maximum TSS removal efficiency was determined as 93.3% at 0.125 AVF. Maximum TP removal efficiencies were determined as 92.8%, 90.8% and 86.2% for 100/2, 100/1.5 and 100/1 input C/P ratios at 0.375 AVF, respectively. Results showed that total phosphorus (TP) removal efficiency is determined by both influent C/P ratio and AVF in AO process. Of these, the effect of AVF is more prominent. For efficient removal of phosphorus, AVF ratios of 0.25 to 0.375 should be employed.

Keywords:

Activated sludge model, AO process, Reactor volumes, Phosphorus removal,

PDF

___

[1] Sun S, Han J, Hu M, Gao M, Qiu Q, Zhang S, Qiu L, Ma J. “Removal of phosphorus from wastewater by Diutina rugosa BL3: Efficiency and pathway”. Science of The Total Environment, 801, 1-10, 2021.
[2] Wang C, Yu S, Cwiertny DM, Yin Y, Myung NV. “Phosphate removal using surface enriched hematite and tetra-nbutylammonium bromide incorporated polyacrylonitrile composite nanofibers”. Science of the Total Environment, 770, 1-11, 2021.
[3] Fang L, Wu B, Lo IMC. “Fabrication of silica-free superparamagnetic ZrO2@Fe3O4 with enhanced phosphate recovery from sewage: performance and adsorption mechanism”. Chemical Engineering Journal, 319, 258-267, 2017.
[4] Zhang C, Guisasola A, Baeza JA. “A review on the integration of mainstream P-recovery strategies with enhanced biological phosphorus removal”. Water Research, 212, 1-15, 2022.
[5] Koh KY, Chen Z, Zhang S, Chen JP. “Cost-effective phosphorus removal from aqueous solution by a chitosan/lanthanum hydrogel bead: Material development, characterization of uptake process and investigation of mechanisms”. Chemosphere, 286(1), 1-10, 2022.
[6] Ak M, Top İ. “Use of treated municipal wastewater for agricultural irrigation”. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 24(6), 1161-1168, 2018.
[7] Demir S, Atçı B. “Sensitivity analysis and principal component analysis for the determination of the most influential kinetic parameters in activated sludge modeling”. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(5), 1-11, 2021.
[8] Manav Demir, N. Investigation of Nutrient Removal and Associated Microorganisms in Advanced Biological Treatment Processes. PhD Thesis, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2012.
[9] Fan Z, Zeng W, Meng Q, Liu H, Ma C, Peng Y. “Achieving partial nitrification, enhanced biological phosphorus removal and in-situ fermentation (PNPRF) in continuousflow system and mechanism analysis at transcriptional level”. Chemical Engineering Journal, 428, 1-11, 2022.
[10] Hussain A, Kumari R, Sachan SG, Sachan A. Chapter 8- Biological Wastewater Treatment Technology: Advancement and Drawbacks. Editors: Shah M, RodriguezCouto S. Microbial Ecology of Wastewater Treatment Plants, 175-192, Elsevier, 2021.
[11] Chen Y, Peng C, Wang J, Ye L, Zhang L, Peng Y. “Effect of nitrate recycling ratio on simultaneous biological nutrient removal in a novel anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2/O)- biological aerated filter (BAF) system”. Bioresource Technology, 102(10), 5722-5727, 2011.
[12] Nadeem K, Alliet M, Plana Q, Bernier J, Azimi S, Rocher V, Albasi C. “Modeling, simulation and control of biological and chemical P-removal processes for membrane bioreactors (MBRs) from lab to full-scale applications: State of the art”. Science of the Total Environment, 809, 1-30, 2022.
[13] Rout PR, Shahid MK, Dash RR, Bhunia P, Liu D, Varjani S, Zhang TC, Surampalli RY. “Nutrient removal from domestic wastewater: A comprehensive review on conventional and advanced technologies”. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 1-16, 2021.
[14] Nguyen TAH, Le TV, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Vu ND, Tran TTT, Nguyen TH., Nguyen C, Nguyen VH, Pham TT. “Hybrid use of coal slag and calcined ferralsol as wetland substrate for improving phosphorus removal from wastewater”. Chemical Engineering Journal, 428, 1-10, 2022.
[15] Fanta AB, Nair AM, Saegrov S, Osterhus SW. “Phosphorus removal from industrial discharge impacted municipal wastewater using sequencing batch moving bed biofilm reactor”. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 41, 1-13, 2021.
[16] Coats ER, Deyo B, Brower N, Brinkman CK. “Effects of anaerobic HRT and VFA loading on the kinetics and stoichiometry of enhanced biological phosphorus removal”. Water Environment Research, 93(9), 1608-1618, 2021.
[17] du Plessis S, Tzoneva R. “Sensitivity study of reduced models of the activated sludge process, for the purposes of parameter estimation and process optimization: Benchmark process with ASM1 and UCT reduced biological models”. Water SA, 38(2), 287-306, 2012.
[18] Henze M, Grady CPLJr, Gujer W, Marais GVR, Matsuo T. Activated Sludge Model No.1. IAWPRC Scientific and Technical Reports No.1. IAWPRC (now IAWQ) London, 1987.
[19] Ni BJ, Pan Y, Guo J, Virdis B, Hu S, Chen X, Yuan Z. “Chapter 16. Denitrification Processes for Wastewater Treatment. Metallobiology”. Metalloenzymes in denitrification: Applications and environmental impacts, 9, 368-418, 2016.
[20] Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, Matsuo T, Wentzel MC, Marais GvR. “Wastewater and biomass characterization for the Activated Sludge Model No. 2: Biological phosphorus removal”. Water Science and Technology, 31(2), 13-23, 1995.
[21] Gujer W, Henze M, Mino T, van Loosdrecht M. “Activated sludge model no. 3”. Water Science and Technology, 39(1), 183-193, 1999.
[22] Rieger L, Koch G, Kühni M, Gujer W, Siegrist H. “The eawag bio-P module for activated sludge model no. 3”. Water Research, 35(16), 3887-3903, 2001.
[23] Janus T, Ulanicki B. “Modelling SMP and EPS formation and degradation kinetics with an extended ASM3 model”. Desalination, 261(1-2), 117-125, 2010.
[24] Shao Y, Liu GH, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, Qi L, Xu X, Wang J, He Y, Li Q, Fan H, Zhang J. “Sludge characteristics, system performance and microbial kinetics of ultra-short-SRT activated sludge processes”. Environment International, 143, 1-11, 2020.
[25] Chan C, Guisasola A, Baeza JA. “Enhanced biological phosphorus removal at low sludge retention time in view of its integration in A-stage systems”. Water Research, 118, 217-226, 2017.
[26] Rossle WH, Pretorius WA. “A review of characterization requirement for in-line prefermenters. Paper 1: Wastewater characterization”. Water SA, 27(3), 405-412, 2001.
[27] Takacs I, Patry GG, Nolasco D. “A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process”. Water Research, 25(10), 1263-1271, 1991.
[28] Manav Demir N, Demir S. “An MS Excel tool for wastewater treatment modeling in undergraduate education: Activated sludge model no. 1”. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26(12), 7008-7017, 2017.
[29] Demir S, Manav Demir N. “Implementation of activated sludge model no. 3 as an educational tool: bioXL3”. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(5), 1154-1173, 2020.
[30] Wang Z, Peng Y, Li J, Liu J, Zhang Q, Li X, Zhang L. “Rapid initiation and stable maintenance of municipal wastewater nitritation during the continuous flow anaerobic/oxic process with an ultra-low sludge retention time”. Water Research, 197, 1-8, 2021.
[31] Sheng X, Qui S, Xu F, Shi J, Song X, Yu Q, Liu R, Chen L. “Management of rural domestic wastewater in a city of Yangtze delta region: Performance and remaining challenges”. Bioresource Technology Reports, 11, 1-7, 2020.
[32] Qiu Y, Shi HC, He M. “Nitrogen and phosphorous removal in municipal wastewater treatment plants in china: a review”. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2010, 1-10, 2010.