___

• Altun, M. (1995). İlkokul 3., 4. ve 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Problem Çözme Davranışları Üzerine cognition and the culture of learning. Bir Araştırma. Doktora Tezi, Ankara, Educational Researcher, 17(1), 32-41. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Busbridge, J. A., & Özçelik, D.A. (1997). İlköğretimde Enstitüsü. Matematik Öğretimi (Çev. D.A., Özçelik), Antonietti, A. (1991). Why does mental visualization YÖK. Dünya Bankası Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme facilitate problem-solving? In R. Logie & M. Projesi Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi, Denis (Eds.), Mental images in human cognition (pp. Ankara. 211-229), Holland: Elseveir Science Pub. Carpenter, T. P., Kepner, H. S., Corbitt, M. K., Baykul, Y. ve Sulak, S. (2006). “Problem Çözme Lindquist, M M., & Reys, R. E. (1980) Solving Stratejilerinin İlköğretimde Problem verbal problems: Results and implications Çözme Başarısına Etkisi”, Ulusal Sınıf for National Assessment. Arithmetic Öğretmenliği Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, C. 1, Ankara, Teacher, 28, 8-12. Kök Yayıncılık. Choi, J.I., & Hannafin, M. (1997). The Effects of Instructional Context and Reasoning Complexity on Mathematics Problem- Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 43-55. Cockcroft, W.H. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools. London: HMSO. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic Motivation and the Process of Learning: Beneficial Effects of Contextualization, Personalization, and Choice. Journal of Education Psychology, 88(4), 715-730. Garderen, D. V., & Montague, M. (2003). Visua- spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(4), 246-254. Geary, D. C. (1994). Children’s mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving: a meta- analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 242-273. Kaufmann, G. (1990). Imagery effects on problem solving. In J. Hampson (Ed.), Imagery: Current developments (pp. 169-196). London: Routledge. Kaur, B. (1997). Difficulties with problem solving in mathematics. The Mathematical Educator, 2(1), 93-112. Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 129-164. Ku, H-Y., & Sullivan, H. J. (2002). Student Performance and Attitudes Using Personalized Mathematics Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 21-33. Lopez, C. L., & Sullivan, H. J. (1992). Effect of Personalization of Instruction Context on the Achievement and Attitudes of Hispanic Students. Education Technology Research and Development, 40(4), 5-13. Lowrie, T. (1996). The use of visual imagery as a problem-solving tool: Classroom implementation. Journal of Mental Imagery, 20, 127-140. Lowrie, T. (1998). The importance of visual processing in non-routine and novel problem solving situations. In A. McIntosh & N. Ellerton (Eds.), Research in mathematics education: Some current trends (pp. 186-210). Perth: MASTEC Publication. Lowrie, T., & Kay, R. (2001). Relationship between visual and nonvisual solution methods and difficulty in elementary mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 248-255. Moyer, P.S. (2000). Communicating mathematically: Children’s literature as a natural connection. The Reading Teacher, 54(3), 246-255. Nathan, M J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E. (1992). A theory of algebra word problem comprehension and its implications for the design of computer learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 9(4), 329-389. Nathan, M.J., Koedinger, K.R. & Tabachneck-Schijf, H.J.M. (1997). Teachers’ and Researchers’ beliefs of early algebra development. In the Proceedings to the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp 554-559), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: Author. Overholt, J., Aaberg, N., & Lindsey, J. (1990). Maths Stories for Problems Solving Success. Ready-to-Use Activities for Grades 7-12, San Francisco, John Wiley & Sons,Inc. Pawley, D., Ayres, P., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (2005). Translating words into equations: A cognitive load theory approach. Educational Psychology, 25, 75-97. Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. E. (1992). Watching Sandy’s understanding grow. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11, 243-257. Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It? (2nd ed.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. Posamentier, A. S., Krulik, S. (1998). Problem-Solving Strategies for Efficient and Elegant Solutions, California, Corwin Press, Inc. Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualisation in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 42-46. Presmeg, C. N., & Canas-Balderas, P. E. (2001). Visualization and affect in nonroutine problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3(4), 289-313. Rieber, L. P. (1995). A historical review of visualization in human cognition. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43(1), 45-56. Riley, M. S , & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5(1), 49-101. Ross, S. M. Mccormick, D., & Krisak, N. (1986). Adapting the Thematic Context of Mathematical Problems to Student Interests: Individualized Versus Group- Based Strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 79(4), 245-252. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Silver, E. A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem- solving instruction. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Sweller, J., & Low, R. (1992). Some cognitive factors relevant to mathematics instruction. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4, 83-94. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251. Tabachneck, H. J. M , Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (1994). Toward a theoretical account of strategy use and sense making in mathematics problem solving. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 836-841). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Tertemiz, N. (1994). İlkokullarda Aritmetik Problemlerini Çözmede Etkili Görülen Bazı Faktörler, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Wiest, L. R. (2002). Aspects of word-problem context that influence children’s problem- solving performance. FOCUS on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 24(2), 38-52.