Arazi Kullanımı/Arazi Örtüsü Değişikliklerinin Ekosistem Hizmetleri Üzerindeki Etkisinin Sayısallaştırılması: Adana-KaraisalıÖrneği

Arazi kullanımındaki küresel ölçekteki değişiklikler biyolojik çeşitliliği, küresel iklimi ve ekosistem hizmetlerini etkiler. Plan ve politikalara yerel ve bölgesel bir ekosistem hizmeti yaklaşımının entegre edilmesi, sürdürülebilir arazi yönetimi için esastır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'nin Adana-Karaisali ilçesindeki arazi kullanımı/arazi örtüsü farklılıkları Normalleştirilmiş Fark Bitki Örtüsü İndeksi (NDVI) kullanarak incelenmiştir.2000 ve 2016 yıllarına ait Landsat uydu görüntüleri ISODATA yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve CORINE sınıflandırma çerçevesinin üçüncü düzeyine göre 16 arazi kullanımı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, en büyük değişimin tarım alanlarında meydana geldiğini, sulanmayan ekilebilir arazilerde %2,57' lik bir azalma, sürekli sulanan arazilerde ise %7,14'lük bir artış olduğunu göstermiştir. Bölgedeki nüfus azalmasına rağmen kesintisiz kentsel doku % 0,07 oranında artmıştır ve ormanlık alanlarda %7,62 artış gözlenmiştir. Tespit edilen değişikliklerin, Ekosistem Hizmetleri Ortak Sınıflandırması (CİCES) çerçevesine dayalı olarak olumlu veya olumsuz etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Su kütleleri ve doğal peyzaj alanlarındaki azalmaya rağmen tarım alanlarındaki, ormanlardaki ve yapay yüzeylerdeki artışların ilçedeki ekosistem hizmetlerideğerlemesini olumlu etkilediği belirlenmiştir.

Quantiﬁcation of the Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in Adana-Karaisalı

Global scale changes in land use affect biodiversity, global climate, and ecosystem services. Integrating a local and regional ecosystem service approach into plans and policies levels is essential for sustainable land management. In this study, land use/land cover differences in Adana-Karaisali district of Turkey were investigated using Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI).Landsat satellite images of the area from 2000 and 2016 were analyzed using ISODATA method and 16 land use were identified based on the third level of the CORINE classification framework. The results showed that the biggest changes occurred in agricultural areas, 2.57% decrease in non-irrigated arable land while a 7.14% increase was observed in permanently irrigated lands. In spite of the decrease in the number of inhabitants in the area, continuous urban fabric increased at the rate of 0.07% and 7.62% increase was observed in forest lands. The positive or negative effects of the identified changes on ecosystem services based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) framework were evaluated. In the case of Karaisalı, in spite of the decrease in water bodies and natural landscapes, it has been observed that increases in agricultural areas, forests, and artificial surfaces positively have affected ecosystem services valuation in the district.

PDF

___

Anaya-Romero M., Muñoz-Rojas M., Ibáñez B., Marañón T. Evaluation of forest ecosystem services in Mediterranean areas. A regional case study in South Spain. Ecosystem Services 2016; 20: 82–90.
Anna H., Sabine S., Thomas W. The concept of ecosystem services regarding landscape research, Living Rev Landscape Res. 2011; 5: 1.
Anonymous. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Forest and Water Affairs, 2016a.
Anonymous. Karaisalı Mayorship, 2016b.
Baral H., Keenan RJ., Fox JC., Stork NE., Kasel S. Spatial assessment of ecosystem goods and services in complex production landscapes: A case study from south-eastern Australia. Ecol Complex 2013; 13: 35– 45.
Braat L., de Groot R. The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosystem Services 2012; 1: 4–15.
Chen X., Vierling L., Deering DA. simple and effective radiometric correction method to improve landscape change detection across sensors and across time. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005; 98: 63-79.
CICES. (Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services) Towards a common international classification of ecosystem services 2013.
Costanza R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O’Neill RV., Paruele J., Raskin RG., Sutton P., Van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997; 387: 253–260.
Costanza R., de Groot R., Braat L., Kubiszewski I., Fioramonti L., Sutton P., Farber S., Grasso M. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services 2017; 28: 1–16.
Costanza R., de Groot R., Sutton P., Van der Ploeg S., Anderson S., Kubiszewski I., Farber S., Turner R. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014; 26: 152-158.
Costanza R., Quatrini S., Øystese S. The valuation of nature and ecosystem services is not privatization. Climate Home News 2012.
Costanza R. Nature: Ecosystems without commodifying them. Nature 2006; 443: 749.
De Groot, RS., Wilson MA., Boumans RMJ. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem function, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 2002; 41: 393-408.
Edenius L., Vencatasawmy CP., Sandstrom P., Dahlberg U., Combining satellite imagery and ancillary data to map snowbed vegetation important to reindeer Rangifer tarandus. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research, 2003; 35(2): 150-157.
Farber S., Costanza R., Childers DL., Erickson J., Gross K., Grove M., Hopkinson CS., Kahn J., Pincetl S., Troy A. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. AIBS Bull. 2006; 56: 121-133.
Foley JA. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005; 309: 570–574.
Gandhi GM., Parthiban S., Thummalu N., Christy A. Vegetation change detection using remote sensing and gis –A case Study of Vellore District. Procedia. Computer Science 2015; 57: 119-121.
Gashaw T., Tulu T., Argav T., Worqlul WA., Tolessa T., Kindu M. Estimating the impacts of land use/land cover changes on Ecosystem Service Values: The case of the Andassa watershed in the Upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia. Ecosystem Services 2018; 31: 219-228.
He J., Shi X., Fu Y., Yuan Y. Evaluation and simulation of the impact of land use change on ecosystem services trade-offs in ecological restoration areas, China, Land Use Policy 2020; 99: 105020
Huete A., Didan K., Miura T., Rodriguez EP., Gao X., Ferreira LG. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ.2002; 83: 195-213.
IPBES. Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (http://www.ipbes.net) accessed 12 December 2015.
Jacobs S., Dendoncker N., Martín-lópez B., Nicholas D., Gomez-baggethun E., Boeraeve F., McGrath FL.,Vierikko K., Geneletti D., Sevecke KJ., Pipart N., Primmar E., Mederly P., Schmidth S., Aragao A., Baral H., Bark RH., Briceno T., Brogna D., Cabral P., Vreese RD., Liquete C., Muller H., Peh KSH., Phelan A., Rincon AR., Rogers SH., Turkelboom F., Reeth WV., Zanten BT., Warn HK., Washbourne CL. A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosystem Services 2016; 22: 213–220.
Karabulut M. An examination and monitoring vegetation conditions in Turkey using NOAA AVHRR Data. Journal of Geographical Sciences 2006; 4(1): 29-42
Kayman Ö. Effect of spectral indices over land use/cover classification: Istanbul, Beylikdüzü District, land use change. Master Thesis, Istanbul University, Istanbul, 2015.
Kindu M., Schneider T., Teketay D., Knoke T. Changes of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover dynamics in Munessa- Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian highlands. Sci. Total Environ.2016; 547: 137–147.
Kubiszewski I., Costanza R., Dorji L., Thoennes P., Tshering K. An initial estimate of the value of ecosystem services in Bhutan. Ecosyst. Serv.2013; 3: e11–e21.
Kumar U., Dasgupta A., Mukhopadhyay C., Ramachandra TV. Random forest algorithm with derived geographical layers for improved classification of remote sensing data. Proceedings of the Indıcon 2011, Engineering Sustainable Solutions, December 16-18, pp. 1-6. Hyderabad - India,
Lam ST., Conway TM. Ecosystem services in urban land use planning policies: A case study of Ontario municipalities, Land Use Policy 2018; 77: 641-651.
Li X., Liu L., Huang L. The ınternational archives of the photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Volume XLII-3/W10, 2020 International Conference on Geomatics in the Big Data Era (ICGBD), 15–17 November 2019, Guilin, Guangxi, China
Li R., Dong M., Cui J., Zhang L., Cui Q., He W. Quantification of the impact of land-use changes on ecosystem services: a case study in Pingbian County. China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2007; 128: 503-510.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystems and human well- being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. 2005.
Mermer A., Yıldız H., Ünal E., Urla Ö., Aydoğdu M., Avağ A., Özgöz MM., Aksakal E., Dumlu S., Koç A., Şimşek U., Özaydın KA., Aydoğmuş O., Dedeoğlu F., Tuğaç MG., Torunlar H. Monitoring rangeland vegetation through satellite images (NDVI) in Eastern Anatolia Region. The 9th Field Crops Congress of Turkey, 12-15 September, 2011, Bursa.
Msofe NK., Sheng L., Li Z. Lyimo J. Impact of land use/cover change on ecosystem service values in the Kilombero Valley Floodplan, South Eastern Tanzania. Forests 2020; 11(1): 109
Na X., Zhang S., Li X., Yu H., Liu C. Improved land cover mapping using random forests combined with Landsat thematic mapper imagery and ancillary geographic data. Photogrammetric Engineering Remote Sensing 2010; 76(7): 833-840.
Osunmadewa BA., Gebrehiwot WZ., Csaplovics E., Adeofun OC. Spatio-temporal monitoring of vegetation phenology in the dry sub-humid region of Nigeria using time series of AVHRR NDVI and TAMSAT datasets. Open Geosci. 2018; 10: 1–11.
Pektezel H., Ateş M. Kapaklı ilçesi’nde (Tekirdağ) arazi kullanımı. Kapaklı, İstanbul, Babil Yayınevi 2016.
Pielke RA., Pitman A., Niyogi D., Mahmood R., McAlpine C., Hossain F., Glodewijk KK., Nair U., Betts R., Fall S., Reichstein M., Kabat P., de Noblet N. Land use/land cover changes and climate: Modelling analysis and observational evidence. Climate Change 2011; 2(6): 828–850.
Quintas-Soriano C., Castro AJ., Castro H. Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands. Land Use Policy 2016; 54: 534-548.
Roces-Díaz JV., Díaz-Varela RA., Álvarez-Álvarez P., Recondo C., Díaz-Varela, ER. A multiscale analysis of ecosystem services supply in the NW Iberian Peninsula from a functional perspective. Ecological Indicators 2014; 50: 24–34.
Rouse JW., Haas RH., Schell JA., Deering DW. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Proceedings of the Third ERTS Symposium, NASA SP-351, 1973, Washington, DC, NASA, 309-317.
Sharma R., Rimal B., Baral H., Nehren U., Paudyal K., Sharma S., Rijal S., Ranpal S., Acharya RP., Alenazy AA., Kandel P. Impact of land cover change on ecosystem services in a tropical forested landscape. Resources 2019, 8: 18.
Srivastava PK., Sudhir K., Singh SK., Gupta M., Thakur JK., Mukherjee S. Modelling impact of land use change trajectories on groundwater quality using remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 2013; 12: 2343-2355.
Song X., Hansen MC., Stehman SV., Potapov PV., Tyukavina A., Vermote EF., Townshend JR. Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Letter 2016; 560- 639.
TEEB. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, London and Washington, DC. 2010.
Tang Z., Shi C., Bi K. Impacts of land cover change and socioeconomic development on ecosystem service values. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 2014; 13(10): 2697-2705.
Teng WL. AVHRR monitoring of U.S crops during the 1988 drought. Photogrametric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1990; 56 (8): 1143-1146.
Tokgöz G. Evaluation of the urban planning based on ecosystem services in the case of Adana- Karaisali. PhD Thesis, Çukurova University Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, Adana, Turkey, 2018.
Tolessa T., Senbeta F., Kidane M. The impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ecosystem Services 2017; 23: 47–54.
Tucker CJ., Holben BN., Elgin JH., McMurtrey JE. III. Relationship of spectral data to grain yield variation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1980; 46(5): 657-666.
TUIK, Turkish Statical Institute. 2016.
Turner BL., Lambin EF., Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007; 104: 20666–20671.
Url.1. https://www.eea.europa.eu/help/faq/what-is-corine-land-cover (Erişim Tarihi: 22.10.2021).
Url.2. https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/COPERNICUS_CORINE_V20_100m (Erişim Tarihi: 22.10.2021).
Van der Ploeg S., De Groot R., Wang Y. The TEEB valuation database: Overview of Structure, Data and Results; Foundation for Sustainable Development: Wageningen 2010; The Netherlands.
Wang Z., Wang Z., Zhang B., Lu C., Ren C. Impact of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem services in the Nenjiang River Basin, Northeast China, Ecological Processes 2015; 4: 11.
Weng Q., Lo CP. Spatial analysis of urban growth impacts on vegetative greenness with Landsat TM data. Geocarto International 2001; 16 (4): 17–25.
Wright C., Gallant A. Improved wetland remote sensing in Yellowstone National Park using classification trees to combine TM imagery and ancillary environmental data. Remote Sensing of Environment 2007; 107(4): 582-605.
Yang W., Yang L., Merchant JM. An assessment of AVHRR/NDVI-eco- climatological relations in Nebraska, U.S.A. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1997; 18(10): 2161-2180.
Yıldız H., Mermer A., Ünal E., Akbaş F. Spatial and temporal analysis of Turkey vegetation with NDVI images. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute 2012; 21(2): 50-56.
Yılmaz T. Mediterranean natural vegetation. Çukurova University Faculty of Agriculture, Adana.1996.
Zhang C., Li W., Travis D. Gaps-fill of SLC-off Landsat ETM + satellite image using a geostatistical approach, International Journal of Remote Sensing 2007; 28(22): 5103–5122.
Zhao L., Zhou GH. Strawberry image segmentation based on ISODATA algorithm. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 55(18): 4812-4813.
Zhang X., Li S. Landscape pattern and design for the ecosystem in constructed wetland, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 2020; 19(9): 1459-1465.