Gözde SERİNDERE, Ceren Aktuna BELGİN, Didar GÜRSOY, Kaan ORHAN

Hatay İ linde Oral Premalign Lezyonların Prevalansı: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2017 ve 2019 yılları arasında Patoloji Anabilim Dalı'na başvuran hastalarda oral premalign lezyonların (OPL) prevalansını değerlendirmektir. Patoloji rapor arşivinde histopatolojik olarak OPL olduğu doğrulanmış toplam 194 hasta geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Bunlardan 82'si (% 42,3) erkek, 112'si (% 57,7) kadındı. Cinsiyet ve yaş bilgisi tıbbi kayıtlardan elde edildi. Patolojik sonuçlara göre OPL'ler sınıflandırıldı. 194 hastada OPL bulundu. 112 (% 57,7) kadın, 82'si (% 42,3) erkekti. Yaş dağılımına göre 10-20, 21-30, 31-40, 41-50- 51-60, 61-70, 71-80 ve 80 yaş üstü hasta sayıları 1 (% 0,5), 13 (% 6,7), 25 (% 12,9), 36 (% 18,5), 50 (% 25,8), 35 (% 18,1), 20 (% 10,3) ve 14 (% 7,2) idi. En sık görülen premalign lezyon liken planus (% 50,6) olarak bulundu. Ağız boşluğunda malignite olasılığını ekarte etmek için biyopsi yapılmalıdır. OPL'lerin erken teşhisi tedavi için önemlidir.

Prevalence of Oral Premalign Lesions in the Hatay Region: A Retrospective Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of oral premalign lesions (OPLs) in patients who attended the Pathology Department between the years of 2017 and 2019. A total of 194 patients confirmed to have OPLs histopathologically from Pathology report archive were retrospectively evaluated. Among them, 82 (42.3%) were male while 112 (57.7%) were female. Gender and age information were taken from medical records. According to the pathological results, OPLs were classified. In 194 patients, OPLs were found. 112 (57.7%) were female while 82 (42.3%) were male. According to age distribution, numbers of patients in 10-20, 21-30, 31-40,41-50- 51-60, 61-70, 71-80 and above 80 age groups were 1 (0.5%), 13 (6.7%), 25 (12.9%), 36 (18.5%), 50 (25.8%), 35 (18.1%), 20 (10.3%) and 14 (7.2%) respectively. The most common premalign lesion was lichen planus (50.6%). Biopsy should be performed to exclude possibility of malignancy in the oral cavity. The early diagnosis of OPLs is important for treatment.

PDF

___

1. Mehrotra R, Pandya S, Chaudhary AK, et al. Prevalence of oral pre-malignant and malignant lesions at a tertiary level hospital in Allahabad, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9:263-265.
2. Modi D, Laishram RS, Sharma LDC, et al. Pattern of oral cavity lesions in a tertiary care hospital in Manipur, India. J Med Soc. 2013;27:199-201.
3. Fierro-Garibay C, Almendros-Marqués N, BeriniAytés L, et al. Prevalence of biopsied oral lesions in a Department of Oral Surgery. J Clin Exp Dent. 2011;3:73-77.
4. Byakodi R, Shipurkar A, Byakodi S, et al. Prevalence of oral soft tissue lesions in Sangli, India. J Community Health. 2011;36:756–759.
5. Cebeci A, Gulsahi A, Kamburoglu K, et al. Prevalence and distribution of oral mucosal lesions in an adult Turkish population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:272-277.
6. Bouqout JE, Gorlin RJ. Leukoplakia lichen planus and other oral keratoses in 23,616 white Americans over the age of 35 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;61:373–381.
7. Lin HC, Corbet EF, Lo EC. Oral mucosal lesions in adult Chinese. J Dent Res. 2001;80:1486–1490.
8. Corbet EF, Holmgren CJ, Phillipsen HP.Oral mucosal lesions in 65–74-year-old Hong Kong Chinese. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22:392–395.
9. Gunes A, Karali E, Sebit T. Retrospective analysis of benign and premalign lesions in the oral cavity. Mucosa. 2019;2:48-52.
10. Iype EM, Pandey M, Mathew A, et al. Oral cancer among patients under the age of 35 years. J Postgrad Med. 2001;47:171-176.
11. Carrard V, Haas A, Rados P, et al. Prevalence and risk indicators of oral mucosal lesions in an urban population from South Brazil. Oral Dis. 2011;17:171–179.
12. Splieth C, Sumnig W, Bessel F, et al. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a representative population. Quintessence Int. 2007;38:23–29.
13. Reibel J. Tobacco or oral health. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:643–644.