İŞ ÇEVRİMLERİ TEORİLERİNİN GELİŞMEKTE OLAN EKONOMİLER BAĞLAMINDA BİR KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

In this article the New Keynesian and the New Classical schools in acplaining the Business Çycles are compared and contrasted. In this analysis, a special empliasis is given on questioning the explanatory power of these theories on the case Less Developed Coımtries. The validity and the importance of the economics assumptions are also discussed.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

İş çevrimleri

___

  • [l]-Long, John ve Charles Plosser. (1983) "Real Business Cycies" Journal ofPoliticalEconomy, 91, l(Feb), 39-69.
  • [2] -Lueas, Robert E.(1981) Studies in Business Cycle Theory, MIT Press.
  • [3] -Kvdland, Fimi ve Edward C. Prescott (1996) “The Computational Experiment: An Econometric Tool”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10. 1, 69-85.
  • [4] -Kydland, Fimi ve Edward C. Prescott (1981). "Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations", Econometrica, 50, 6, 1345-1370
  • [5] -Akerloff, George ve Janet Yellen (1985),."ANear-Rational Model of the Buainess Cycle, with Wage and Price Inertia", Ouarterly Journal of Economics. 100, 823-838.
  • [6] -Danthine .T. P ve .T.B Donaldson (1990) “Efficiency Wages and the Business Cycle Puzzle”, European Economic Review, 34, 290-316
  • [7] -Sıms C (1996) “ Macroeconomics and Methodology”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 1,87- 104.
  • [8] -Kıng, Robert, Charles Plosser, T. Rebello.(1988) "Production, Growth and Business Cycies: The Basic Neoclassical Model'', Journal of Monetary Economics, 21,195-232.
  • [9] -Kıııg, Robert, Charles I. Plosser ve Sergio T. Rebello.(1988) "Production Growth and Business Cycies: II New Directions", Journal of ,Monetary Economics, 21,1988, 309-341.
  • [10]-McCallıım, B.T. (1986) "On Real and Stickv-Price Theories of the Business Cycle", Journal of Money, Credii and Banking, 18, 397-414.
  • [11]-Rolemberg, Julio J.( 1987) "The NewKeynesıan Microfoundation", NBER Macroeconomic Aımual, MIT Press, 609-704.
  • [12]-Blinder, Alan. (1987), "Kevnes, Lucas and Scientifıc Progress'ÇImcn'caH Economic Review. (Papers and Proceedings) 77,130-136.