LİMANLARIN HİNTERLANT BAĞLANTI KABİLİYETLERİ ÜZERİNE LİTERATÜR TARAMASI VE LİMAN KAPISI OLARAK BUCAK OVASI
Dünya ticaret rakamlarının seyrine baktığımızda son 70 yıldaki ivmeli artışlar gözümüze çarpmaktadır. Bu yükselişte serbest piyasa koşullarının yarattığı rekabet ortamı temel etkendir. Birbirleri ile rekabet içerisinde olan firmalar geliştirdikleri yenilikler ile rakiplerinin önüne geçmeye gayret ederlerken tedarik zinciri içerisindeki lojistik alışkanlıklarının temelden değişmesine neden oldular. Bugün sıkça duyduğumuz konteyner, intermodal kavramları 20. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında beliren bu yeniliklerin öne çıkanlarıdır. Her yıl açıklanan Birleşmiş Milletler Ticaret ve Kalkınma Konferansı verilerine göre küresel tedarik zincirindeki emtia sevkiyatının maddiyat ve zaman bakımında %80’den fazlasını oluşturan denizyolu ağları ile karadaki hinterlant sahası arasında kalan limanlar dış ticaretin kalbi niteliğindedir. Denizyolu bağlantılı modlararası taşımacılık ve maliyet düşürme üzerine 1950’lerden beri çokça çalışma yapılmıştır. Çalışmada dünya limanlarının bu rekabet koşullarında önem verdikleri “Hinterlant Bağlanabilirlik” yetenekleri ve bu konuda yaptıkları yatırımlar üzerine yapılan çalışmalar incelenerek Batı Akdeniz Bölge Hinterlandında navlun trafiğinin kalitesini artıracak bir çözüm yolu olarak ticaret limanın kapısını Bucak Ovasına çekilme şeklinde modernize edilmesi tartışılacaktır.
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Liman, Hinterlant, Liman Kapısı, Liman-Hinterlant Bağlanabilirliği, Lojistik, Tedarik Zinciri, Dış Ticaret, Denizcilik
LITERATURE REVIEW ON CAPABILITY OF PORT-HINTERLAND CONNECTIVITY AND BUCAK VALLEY AS PORT GATEWAY
The past 70 years have seen increasingly rapid advances in the field of international trade. Along with this growth in trade, however, there is increasing concern over the share of freight. Over the past century there has been a dramatic increase in movements at global supply chain system. A discrete reason emerged from this is competitive market conditions. Port is an important component in the supply chain system and plays a key role in international trade as more than %80 has been transported by sea vehicles. Traditionally, port’s hinterlands have subscribed to the belief that cannot be shared with among the ports. But by one of the most important event of the second half of 20th century; containerization, sharing hinterland became possible. Most of the ports in Europe started to search variety ways to be competitive. So, intermodal and cost mitigation have been an object of research since the 1950s. A considerable amount of the literature has been published on port-hinterland connectivity. What we know about connectivity is largely based upon empirical studies that investigate how the quality of connections sets between port and its hinterland. A major problem with this kind of study is lack of data as mentioned in most of the articles. Although extensive research has been carried out on Logistics Village, no single study exists on port hinterland connectivity. The purpose of this paper is to review recent research into the port literature and to indicate the importance of rail-road connection to Akdeniz Region. This study systematically reviews the top ports which provide better connectivity for West Mediterranean Region. Also the study provides an exciting opportunity to advance our knowledge of port hinterland connectivity by enhancing the gateway to Bucak Lowland.
Keywords:
Port, Hinterland, Port Gateway, Intermodal, Maritime, Logistics, Hinterland Connectivity,
___
- Acciaro, M., Bardi, A., Cusano, M. I., Ferrari, C., & Tei, A. (2017). Contested port hinterlands: An empirical survey on Adriatic seaports. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 5(2), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2017.03.006Chen, H., Cullinane, K., & Liu, N. (2017). Developing a model for measuring the resilience of a port-hinterland container transportation network. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 97, 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.10.008De Langen, P. W. (2007). Port competition and selection in contestable hinterlands; the case of Austria. Ejtir, 7(1), 1–14. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/31562764/2007_01_01.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1505821067&Signature=IeNM0YHXxW9scDWXhXwulpJF0Ao%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B filename%3DPort_competition_and_selection_in_cFerrari, C., Parola, F., & Gattorna, E. (2011). Measuring the quality of port hinterland accessibility: The Ligurian case. Transport Policy, 18(2), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.11.002Frémont, A., & Franc, P. (2010). Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4), 548–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.009Guerrero, D. (2014). Deep-sea hinterlands: Some empirical evidence of the spatial impact of containerization. Journal of Transport Geography, 35, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.010Halim, R. A., Kwakkel, J. H., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2016). A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 95, 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.05.014Hoffmann, J., Saeed, N., & Sødal, S. (2019). Liner shipping bilateral connectivity and its impact on South Africa’s bilateral trade flows. Maritime Economics & Logistics, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-019-00124-8Moura, T. G. Z., Garcia-Alonso, L., & Salas-Olmedo, M. H. (2017). Delimiting the scope of the hinterland of ports: Proposal and case study. Journal of Transport Geography, 65, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.09.012Pinto, J. T. de M., Mistage, O., Bilotta, P., & Helmers, E. (2018). Road-rail intermodal freight transport as a strategy for climate change mitigation. Environmental Development, 25, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.07.005Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2012). Dry ports in European and North American intermodal rail systems: Two of a kind? Research in Transportation Business and Management, 5, 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.10.003Talley, W. K., & Ng, M. W. (2017). Hinterland transport chains: Determinant effects on chain choice. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.026Tovar, B., Hernández, R., & Rodríguez-Déniz, H. (2015). Container port competitiveness and connectivity: The Canary Islands main ports case. Transport Policy, 38, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.001Van den Berg, R., & De Langen, P. W. (2011). Hinterland strategies of port authorities: A case study of the port of Barcelona. Research in Transportation Economics, 33(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.002van Klink, H. A., & van den Berg, G. C. (2002). Gateways and intermodalism. Journal of Transport Geography, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-6923(97)00035-5Wilmsmeier, G., Monios, J., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2015). Drivers for Outside-In port hinterland integration in Latin America: The case of Veracruz, Mexico. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 14, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.10.013Woodburn, A. (2012). Intermodal rail freight activity in Britain: Where has the growth come from? Research in Transportation Business and Management, 5, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.09.001Woodburn, A. (2013). Effects of rail network enhancement on port hinterland container activity: A United Kingdom case study. Journal of Transport Geography, 33, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.010Woodburn, A. (2017). An analysis of rail freight operational efficiency and mode share in the British port-hinterland container market. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.002
- ISSN: 2687-5845
- Başlangıç: 2019
- Yayıncı: Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi