Lastik üretiminden kaynaklanan yüzey aktif madde içeren atık suların koagülasyon bazlı arıtma alternatiflerinin PROMETHEE yaklaşımı ile değerlendirilmesi
Bu çalışmada, araç lastiği üretim prosesinde preslenen hammadde hamurunun birbirine yapışmasını engellemek için kullanılan yüzey aktif madde içeren atık suyun, konvansiyonel koagülasyon ve mikrodalga oksidasyonu destekli elektrokoagülasyon prosesleri ile arıtımı incelenmiştir. Prosesler Taguchi deney tasarımı yöntemi (L8) ile maksimum kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderimini sağlayacak biçimde optimize edilmiştir. Pareto analizi ile mikrodalga oksidasyonu destekli elektrokoagülasyon prosesinde en etkili parametrenin mikrodalga süresi, konvansiyonel koagülasyon prosesinde ise FeCl3.7H2O dozu olduğu bulunmuştur. Varyans analizi ile iki proses için de belirlenen modellerin kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderimini açıklamada anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Optimum deneysel koşullardaki kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderimi, kimyasal çamur üretimi, işletme maliyeti ve proseslerin tercih edilebilirlik seviyeleri dikkate alınarak, çok kriterli karar verme süreçlerinden olan PROMETHEE yöntemi ile en uygun proses mikrodalga oksidasyonu destekli elektrokoagülasyon olarak belirlenmiştir. Mikrodalga oksidasyonu destekli elektrokoagülasyon prosesinde, optimum şartlarda kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderim verimi, çamur miktarı ve işletim maliyetleri sırasıyla % 66.9, 6.27 g/L ve 1.195 €/L olarak bulunmuştur. Prosesinin seçiminde kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderim verimi ve çamur miktarı kriterlerinin pozitif yönde etki ettikleri belirlenmiştir.
Evaluation of coagulation based treatment alternatives of wastewater containing surfactant from tire manufacturing by PROMETHEE approach
In this study, the treatment of wastewater containing surfactant used to prevent the sticking of the raw material pulp pressed in the tire production process, with conventional coagulation and microwave oxidation-supported electrocoagulation processes was investigated. The processes were optimized to ensure maximum chemical oxygen demand removal by the Taguchi experimental design method (L8). With Pareto analysis, it was found that the most effective parameter in microwave oxidation-supported electrocoagulation processes is microwave duration while the most effective parameter in the conventional coagulation process was FeCl3.7H2O dose. Analysis of variance found that the models determined for both processes were significant in explaining chemical oxygen demand removal. The appropriate process has been determined as the microwave oxidation-supported electrocoagulation, with the PROMETHEE method considering the optimum experimental conditions, chemical oxygen demand removal, chemical sludge production, operating cost and the preferability criteria of the processes. In microwave oxidation-supported electrocoagulation process, under optimum conditions, chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency, the amount of sludge production and operating costs were found as 66.9 %, 6.27 g / L and 1.195 € / L, respectively. It was determined that the criteria of chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency and sludge amount had a positive effect on the selection of the process.
___
- [1] K. Lawrence, L.K. Wang, Y.T. Yung-Tse Hung, H. Howard, H.H Lo, and C. Constantine Yapijakis, Handbook of Industrial and Hazardous Wastes Treatment. Marcel Dekker Publishing, New York, 2004.
- [2] J. Kaleta, and M. Elektorowicz, The removal of anionic surfactants
from water in coagulation process, Environmental Technology (United
Kingdom), 34(5-8), 999–1005, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/
09593330.2012.733415
- [3] M.J. Scott and M.N. Jones, The biodegradation of surfactants in the
environment. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes,
1508(1-2), 235-251, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4157(00)00013-7
- [4] S.M. Mirbahoush, N. Chaibakhsh and Z. Moradi-Shoeili, Highly
efficient removal of surfactant from industrial effluents using flaxseed
mucilage in coagulation/photo-Fenton oxidation process.
Chemosphere, 231(51-59), 2019. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.118
- [5] M.A. Aboulhassan, S. Souabi, A. Yaacoubi, and M. Baudu, Removal
of surfactant from industrial wastewaters by coagulation flocculation
process. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology,
3(4), 327–332, 2006. https://doi.org/ 10. 1007/BF03325941
- [6] S. Verma, B. Prasad and I.M. Mishra, Pretreatment of petrochemical
wastewater by coagulation and flocculation and the sludge
characteristics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 178(1-3), 1055-1064,
2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.02.047
- [7] A.A. Siyal, M.R. Shamsuddin, A. Low and N.E Rabat, A review on
recent developments in the adsorption of surfactants from
wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 254, 109797, 2020.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109797
- [8] A.G.L. Moura, V.B. Centurion, D.Y. Okada, F. Motteran, T.P. Delforno,
V.M. Oliveira, and M.B.A Varesche, Laundry wastewater and domestic
sewage pilot-scale anaerobic treatment: Microbial community
resilience regarding sulfide production. Journal of Environmental
Management, 251, 109495, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109495
- [9] A. Dhuiib, N. Hamad, and I. Hassairi, Degradation of anionic
surfactants by Citrobacter braakii. Process Biochemistry, 38(8), 1245-
1250, 2003. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00322-9
- [10] C.V. Faria, T.P. Delforno, D.Y. Okada, and M.B.A. Varesche, Evaluation
of anionic surfactant removal by anaerobic degradation of
commercial laundry wastewater and domestic sewage. Environmental
Technology, 40(8), 988-996, 2019. https://doi.org/
10.1080/09593330.2017.1414317
- [11] J. Huang, L. Zhu, G. Zeng, L. Shi, Y. Shi, K. Yi, and X. Li, Recovery of
Cd(II) and surfactant in permeate from MEUF by foam fractionation
with anionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures. Colloids and Surfaces A:
Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 570, 81-88, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.010
- [12] B. Mondal, A. Adak, and P. Datta, UV-H2O2 advanced oxidation of
anionic surfactant: reaction kinetics, effects of interfering substances
and operating conditions. Environmental Engineering & Management
Journal, 18(6), 1245-1254, 2019. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2019.119
- [13] F. Aoudjit, O. Cherifi, and D. Halliche, Simultaneously efficient
adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of sodium dodecyl sulfate
surfactant by one-pot synthesized TiO2/layered double hydroxide
materials. Separation Science and Technology, 54(7), 1095-1105, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.1527352
- [14] R.C. Kaggwa, C.L. Mulalelo, P. Denny, and T.O Okurut, The impact of
alum discharges on a natural tropical wetland in Uganda. Water
Research, 35(3) 795-807, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354
(00)00301-8
- [15] C. Zhang, K.T. Valsaraj, W.D. Constant, and D. Roy, Aerobic
biodegradation kinetics of four anionic and nonionic surfactants at
sub- and supra-critical micelle concentrations (CMCs). Water
Research, 33(1), 115-124, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98) 00
170-5
- [16] M.I. Bautista-Toledo, J. Rivera-Utrilla, J. D. Méndez-Díaz, M.
Sánchez-Polo, and F. Carrasco-Marín, Removal of the surfactant
sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate from water by processes based on
adsorption/bioadsorption and biodegradation. Journal of Colloid and
Interface Science, 418, 113-119, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.001
- [17] H. Hidaka, T. Oyama, T. Horiuchi, T. Koike, and N. Serpone, Photo-
induced oxidative synergistic degradation of mixed anionic/cationic
surfactant systems in aqueous dispersions. A detailed study of the
DBS/HTAB system. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 99(3-4), 485-
489, 2010. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.041
- [18] S. Sharma, and H. Simsek, Treatment of canola-oil refinery effluent
using electrochemical methods: A comparison between combined
electrocoagulation + electrooxidation and electrochemical
peroxidation methods. Chemosphere, 221, 630-639, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.066
- [19] APHA, Standard methods for the examination of water and
wastewater. 21st edn. Washington, DC: American Public Health
Association, 2005.
- [20] P.J. Ross, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. McGraw
Hill Internatioanal, New York, 1996.
- [21] F. Urfalıoğlu, and T. Genç, Çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri ile
Türkiye’nin ekonomik performansının avrupa birliği üye ülkeleri ile
karşılaştırılması. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi,
35, 329-360, 2015. https://doi.org/ 10.14780/iibdergi.201324469
- [22] M. Gul, E. Celik, A. Taskin Gumus, and A.F. Guneri, A fuzzy logic
based promethee method for material selection problems. Beni-Suef
University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 68-79, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2017.07.002
- [23] J.P. Brans, P.H. Vincke, and B. Mareschal, How to select and how
to rank projects: the promethee method. European Journal of
Operational Research, 24(2), 228-238, 1986.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86) 90044-5
- [24] M. Behzadian, R.B Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi, and M. Aghdasi,
PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and
applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198-
215, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
- [25] J. Behin, N. Farhadian, M. Ahmadi, and M. Parvizi, Ozone
assisted electrocoagulation in a rectangular internal-loop airlift
reactor: Application to decolorization of acid dye. Journal of Water
Process Engineering, 8, 171-178, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.jwpe.2015.10.003
- [26] M. Asem, W.M.F.W. Nawawi, and D.N. Jimat, Evaluation of water
absorption of polyvinyl alcohol-starch biocomposite reinforced with
sugarcane bagasse nanofibre: optimization using two-level factorial
design. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 368,
012005, 2018. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757-899X/368/1/012005
- [27] M.M Abdulredha, S.A. Hussain, and L.C. Abdullah, Separation
emulsion via non-ionic surfactant: an optimization. Processes, 7(6),
382, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7060382
- [28] P.S. Bhandari, & P.R. Gogate, Microwave assisted persulfate
induced degradation of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate. Korean
Journal of Chemical Engineering, 36(12), 200-2007, 2019.
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11814-019-0390-z
- [29] B.H. Park, S. Kim, A.Y. Seo, & T.G. Lee, Evaluation of optimal
conditions for anionic surfactant removal in wastewater.
Chemosphere, 263, 128174, 2021. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128174
- [30] E. Gengec, M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, A. Akyol, and K. Oktor,
Optimization of baker's yeast wastewater using response surface
methodology by electrocoagulation. Desalination, 286, 200-209, 2012.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.023
- [31] G. Tuzkaya, B. Gülsün, C. Kahraman, and D. Özgen, an İntegrated
fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material
handling equipment selection problem and an application. Expert
Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2853-2863, 2010. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.004
- [32] R.J. Li, Fuzzy method in group decision making. Computers &
Mathematics with Applications, 38 (1), 91-101, 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221 (99) 00172-8