___

• Audrey, Davis, A Return To The Tradıtıonal Use Of The Wrıt Of Mandamus, Lewis & Clark Law review, Vol24.4, 2020,ss.1527-1548
• Bamzaı,Adıtya, The Origins of Judicial Deference to Executive Interpretation, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 126, No. 4 (Şubat 2017), ss. 908-1001
• Control by Mandamus over Jurisdictional Mistake of Law, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Ocak 1914), ss. 320-322
• Dragan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration),21 Şubat 2003, (2003), 228 F.T.R. 52 (TD): Akt: Bellissimo, Mario
• D., “Mandamus: A Compelling Remedy?”ss.1-17: https://www.cba.org/cba/cle/pdf/Bellissimo.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 15.01.2022)
• E. R. S., Habeas Corpus as a Method of Review: Prohibition: Mandamus, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 5 (Nisan 1943), ss. 937-943
• Erhurman, Tufan, Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti İdari Yargılama Hukuku, Türk ve İngiliz Hukuk Sistemleriyle Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme, Işık Kitapevi, Kıbrıs 2012,s.223.
• Fenn Augustus H., Two Questions concerning Mandamus, The Yale Law Journal , Haziran 1893, Vol. 2, No. 6 (Ocak 1893), ss. 219-227,s.221
• Gay - Torrence (1904) October 18, 1904, 144, 145,147: https://casetext.com/case/gay-v-torrance-2
• Goodman, Leonard S., “Mandamus in the Colonies-The Rise of the Superintending Power of American Courts”, The
• merican Journal of Legal History , Oct., 1957, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Oct., 1957), ss. 308-335,309-310.
• Henderson, G., Foundations of English administrative law : certiorari and mandamus in the seventeenth century, Harvard University Press; London: Oxford University Press. 1963.s.127-42
• In The Unıted States Court Of Appeals For The Nınth Cırcuıt, Case: 17-72917, 10/24/2017, ID: 10628844, DktEntry: 13, Page 1 of 234,s.10.
• James E. Pfander, Marbury, Original Jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court’s Supervisory Powers, 101 COLUM. L. REV. 1515, 1525 (2001)
• Mandamus In Admınıstratıve Actıons: Current Approaches, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1973:15,ss.207-217,s.208
• Mandamus, The Yale Law Journal , Apr., 1910, Vol. 19, No. 6 (Nisan 1910), ss. 462-465
• Mandamus. Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States. Mandamus in Aid of Appellate Jurisdiction, Columbia Law Review, Şubat 1933, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Şubat 1933), ss. 366-368
• Mandamus. Determination of Constitutionality Source: Columbia Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 3 (Mart 1924), ss. 317-318
• Mandamus. Public School Authorities. Administrative Law, Columbia Law Review, Aralık 1921, Vol. 21, No. 8 (Dec., 1921), ss. 823-824
• Mandamus. Revocation of Void License Granted by Mayor , Columbia Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 7 (Kasım 1928), ss. 979-980
• Mandamus. Writ to Compel Recognition as Officer of Private Corporation. Mandamus , The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 5 (Mar., 1923), ss. 503-504
• Mandamus: When Issued, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 7 (Mayıs, 1923), ss. 813-814
• Necatigil, Zaim,Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nde Anayasa ve Yönetim Hukuku,Rüstem Kitapevi,İstanbul,1988,s.129
• Revıew Of Prerogatıve Wrıts, Issues Paper/Law Commission, New Zeland.,Wellington 2008,ss.1-44,s.7
• State v. Hurd Case (1895),USA Law, 47: https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1981/86-n-j-525-0.html
• Tapping, Thomas, “The Law And Practıce Of The High Prerogative Writ Of Mandamus 2” (1853). s 56
• Turhan, Turgut, Tarihsel Bakış Açısıyla Kıbrıs Türk Hukuk Sistemi, AÜHFD 2008,ss.253-283,s.278
• Viner Charles, A General Abrıdgement Of Law And Equıty, London, 1742, 422–28