___

• Alibali, M. W., Phillips, K. M., & Fischer, A. D. (2009). Learning new problem-solving strategies leads to changes in problem representation. Cognitive Development, 24(2), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.12.005
• Altun M., & Memnun D. S. (2008). Mathematics teacher trainees’ skills and opinions on solving non-routine mathematical problems. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4(2), 213-238.
• Altun, M. (2014). Ortaokullarda (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflarda) matematik öğretimi [Teaching mathematics in secondary schools (5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades)]. (10th ed.). Alfa Aktüel.
• Altun, M., & Akkaya, R. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ comments on PISA math questions and our country’s students’ low achievement levels. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], 29(1), 19-34.
• Altun, M., & Arslan, Ç. (2006). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin problem çözme stratejilerini öğrenmeleri üzerine bir çalışma [A study on elementary school students' learning problem solving strategies]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 1-21.
• Altun, M., & Bozkurt, I. (2017). A new classification proposal for mathematical literacy problems. Education and Science, 42(190), 171-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6916
• Altun, M., Memnun, D. S., & Yazgan, Y. (2007). Primary school teacher trainees’ skills and opinions on solving non-routine mathematical problems. Elementary Education Online, 6(1), 127-143.
• Anderson, J. (2009). Mathematics curriculum development and the role of problem solving. The Australian Curriculum Studies Association's 2009 Biennial Conference (ACSA Conference). Retrieved from http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/-Judy%20Anderson%20-%20Mathematics%20Curriculum%20Development.pdf
• Anıl, D., Özkan, Y. Ö., & Demir, E. (2015). PISA 2012 araştırması ulusal nihai rapor [PISA 2012 survey national final report]. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2wxMX5xMcnhaGtnV2x6YWsyY2c/view?resourcekey=0-eKJtL9If8HV5aaL2vclhMg
• Artut, P. D., & Tarım, K. (2006). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin rutin olmayan sözel problemleri çözme düzeylerinin çözüm stratejilerinin ve hata türlerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the elemantary school students’ problem solving levels, problem solving strategies and error types in the nonroutine word problems]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(2), 39-50.
• Baki, A. T., & Özpınar, İ. T. (2007). Logo destekli geometri öğretimi materyalinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkileri ve öğrencilerin uygulama ile ilgili görüşleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(34), 153.
• Bautier, E., & Rayou, P. (2007). What PISA really evaluates: literacy or students’ universes of reference?. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9043-9
• Bolstad, O. H. (2021). Lower secondary students’ encounters with mathematical literacy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00386-7
• Breakspear, S. (2012).The Policy Impact of PISA: An Exploration of the Normative Effects of International Benchmarking in School System Performance. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9fdfqffr28-en.
• Breen, S., Cleary, J., & O'Shea, A. (2009). An investigation of the mathematical literacy of first year third-level students in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802566915
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Manual of data analysis for social sciences]. PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS] (3rd ed.). Pegem Akademi.
• Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Gonçalves, C. (2017). Fifteen years looking at the mirror: On the presence of PISA in education policy processes (Portugal, 2000‐2016). European Journal of Education, 52(2), 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12210
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. ve Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge Falmer.
• Colwell, J., & Enderson, M. C. (2016). “When I hear literacy”: Using pre-service teachers' perceptions of mathematical literacy to inform program changes in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.001
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Çelebioğlu, B., & Yazgan, Y. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin bağıntı bulma ve sistematik liste yapma stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 15-28.
• Delice, A., & Sevimli, E. (2010). Geometri problemlerinin çözüm süreçlerinde görselleme becerilerinin incelenmesi: ek çizimler [Investigation of visualization ability in geometry problem solving process: auxiliary drawings]. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 31, 83-102.
• Dinçer, B., Akarsu, E., & Yılmaz, S. (2016). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematik okuryazarlığı özyeterlik algıları ile matematik öğretimi yeterlik inanç düzeylerinin incelenmesi [The investigation of perceptions of math literacy self-efficacy and mathematics teaching efficacy belief levels of preservice primary mathematics teachers]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 7(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.16949/turcomat.99884
• Dossey, J., McCrone, S., Turner, R., & Lindquist, M. (2008). PISA 2003 mathematical literacy and learning in the Americas. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(2), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150802169289
• Eisenmann, P., Novotná, J., Přibyl, J., & Břehovský, J. (2015). The development of a culture of problem solving with secondary students through heuristic strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 535-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0150-2
• Elia, I., Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kolovou, A. (2009). Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics. ZDM, 41(5), 605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0184-6
• Evrekli, E., İnel, D., Deniş, H., & Balım, A. G. (2011). Fen eğitimi alanındaki lisansüstü tezlerdeki yöntemsel ve istatistiksel sorunlar [Methodological and statistical problems in graduate theses in the field of science education]. İlköğretim Online,10(1), 206-218.
• Fidan, Y., & Türnüklü, E. (2010). İlköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin geometrik düşünme düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of 5th grade students’ levels of geometric thinking in terms of some variables]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(27), 185-197.
• Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
• Güler, H. K. (2013). Türk öğrencilerin PISA’da karşılaştıkları güçlüklerin analizi [Analysis of turkish students’ difficulties encountered in PISA]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 26(2), 501-522.
• Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Kjærnsli, M. (2016). Students’ test motivation in PISA: the case of Norway. The Curriculum Journal, 27(3), 406-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2016.1156004
• Işık, C., & Kar, T. (2011). İlköğretim 6, 7 ve 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin sayı algılama ve rutin olmayan problem çözme becerilerinin incelenmesi [Investigating of the number perception and nonroutine problem solving skills of 6th, 7th and 8th grade students]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 57-72.
• İlbağı, E. A. (2012). PISA 2003 matematik okuryazarlığı soruları bağlamında 15 yaş grubu öğrencilerinin matematik okuryazarlığı ve tutumlarının incelenmesi [Examination of the mathematical literacy and attitudes of the students aged 15 in terms of PISA 2003 mathematical literacy items]. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Atatürk University, Erzurum.
• Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014) Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications
• Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kaur, B. & Yeap, B. H. (2009). Mathematical problem solving in Singaporeschools. In Kaur, B.,Yeap, B.H. & Kapur, M. (Eds.). Mathematical problem solving: Yearbook 2009 (pp. 3-13). Association of Mathematics Educationand World Scientific.
• Kılıç, S., Çene, E., & Demir, İ. (2012). Türkiye’deki matematik başarısının öğrenme stratejileri açısından 8 ülkeyle karşılaştırılması [Comparison of learning strategies for mathematics achievement in Turkey with eight countries]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(4), 2585-2598.
• Köse, M. (2012). PISA 2003, 2006 ve 2009 Türkiye Uygulaması matematik ortak maddelerindeki başarıların incelenmesi [Examining Academic Achivement in PISA 2003, 2006 and 2009 Turkey Implementation by Using Mathematic Common Items]. [Unpublished master thesis]. Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. Yale University Press.
• Lin, S. W., & Tai, W. C. (2015). Latent class analysis of students' mathematics learning strategies and the relationship between learning strategy and mathematical literacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 390-395. Doi:10.13189/ujer.2015.030606
• Marczyk, G., DeMatteo, D. & Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of research design and methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi 5-8. sınıflar öğretim programı [Middle school math class 5th -8th classes curriculum]. Talim Terbiye Başkanlığı Yayınları.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Mathematics lesson curriculum (Primary and secondary school grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8)]. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201813017165445-MATEMAT%C4%B0K%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%202018v.pdf
• Mudaly, R. (2011). Risking it: Entering uneven socio-scientific spaces in a life sciences classroom. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(3), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2011.10740716
• Muyo, M. (2015). Prizren Eğitim Fakültesi öğrencilerinin matematik okuryazarlığı problemlerini çözme becerilerinin geliştirilmesi [Improving mathematical literacy and problem solving abilities of students in Prizren faculty of education]. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Balıkesir University, Balıkesir.
• Nahornick, A. (2014). The effect of group dynamics on high-school students' creativity and problem-solving strategies with investigative open-ended non-routine problems. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Columbia University, Columbia.
• Novita, R., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2012). Exploring primary student’s problem-solving ability by doing tasks like PISA's question. Journal on Mathematics Education, 3(2), 133-150. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078578.pdf
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014). PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2019), PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
• Özgen, K., & Bindak, R. (2008). Matematik okuryazarlığı öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [The development of self-efficiacy scale for mathematics literacy]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 16(2), 517-528.
• Pilten, P. (2008). Üstbiliş stratejileri öğretiminin ilköğretim beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin matematiksel muhakeme becerilerine etkisi [The effect of metacognitive instruction on mathematical reasoning of fifth grade primary school students]. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Gazi University, Ankara.
• Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
• Pugalee, D. K. (1999). Constructing a model of mathematical literacy. The Clearing House, 73(1), 19-22.
• Ramnarain, U. (2014). Empowering educationally disadvantaged mathematics students through a strategies-based problem solving approach. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0098-8
• Sáenz, C. (2009). The role of contextual, conceptual and procedural knowledge in activating mathematical competencies (PISA). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(2), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9167-8
• Shuttleworth, M. (2009). Content validity. Retrieved from https://explorable.com/content-validity
• Stacey, K. (2015). The real world and the mathematical world. In K. Stacey & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing mathematical literacy. The PISA experience (pp. 57–84). Springer.
• Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience. Springer.
• Syeda, T. J. (2015). Perceptions of Private College Teachers of Karachi about the Curriculum Prescribed by Sindh Bureau of Curriculum (BOC). Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(4), 13-24. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1092636.pdf
• Şefik, Ö. & Dost, Ş. (2016). Secondary preservice mathematics teachers' views on mathematical literacy. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 320-338. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.277935
• Toh, T. L. (2021). School calculus curriculum and the Singapore mathematics curriculum framework. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(3), 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01225-6
• Uyangör, S. M., & Övez, F. T. D. (2012). İlköğretim altıncı sınıf matematik dersi öğretim programı cebir öğrenme alanı kazanımlarına ulaşılma düzeyi [Reaching of attainment levels of algebra learning domain in sixth grade of elementary mathematics education program]. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(1), 01-22.
• Ülger, T. K., Bozkurt, I., & Altun, M. (2020). Thematic Analysis of Articles Focusing on Mathematical Literacy in Mathematics Teaching-Learning Process. Education and Science, 45(201), 1-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8028
• Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Lasure, S., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Bogaerts, H., & Ratinckx, E. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(3), 195-229. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0103_2
• Wardono, Waluya, S. B., Scolastika, M., & Candra, D. (2016). Mathematics literacy on problem based learning with indonesian realistic mathematics education approach assisted e-learning edmodo. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 693(1), 1-10. IOP Publishing.
• Wheater, R., R. Ager, B. Burge, & J. Sizmur. (2014). Achievement of 15-year-olds in England: PISA 2012 national report (OECD Programme for International Student Assessment). Retrieved from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/19484/1/programme-for-international-student-assessment-pisa-2012-national-report-for-england.pdf
• Yazgan, Y. (2007). Dördüncü ve beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin rutin olmayan problem çözme stratejileriyle ilgili gözlemler [Observations about fourth and fifth grade students’ strategies to solve non-routine problems]. İlköğretim Online, 6(2), 249-263.
• Yazgan, Y., & Bintaş, J. (2005). İlköğretim dördüncü ve beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin problem çözme stratejilerini kullanabilme düzeyleri: Bir öğretim deneyi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 210-218.
• Yenilmez, K., & Uysal, E. (2011). Sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik okuryazarlığı düzeyi [The mathematics literacy level of eighth grade students]. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 1-15.
• Yıkmış, A. (1999). Zihin engelli çocuklara temel toplama ve çıkarma işlemlerinin kazandırılmasında etkileşim ünitesi ile sunulan bireyselleştirilmiş öğretim materyalinin etkililiği [The effectiveness of the individualized teaching materials presented with interactive unit on the teaching of the basic addition and subtraction skills to the student with mental retardation]. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
• Yıldırım, A. (1996). Disiplinlerarası öğretim kavramı ve programlar açısından doğurduğu sonuçlar. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 89-94.
• Yılmaz, K., & Altınkurt, Y. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının Türk eğitim sisteminin sorunlarına ilişkin görüşleri [Prospective teachers’ views about the problems of Turkish educational system]. Uluslararası insan bilimleri dergisi, 8(1), 942-973.