Selis Gülseven GÜVEN, Cem UZUN, Memduha TAŞ, Erbay DEMİR

Trakya Bölgesinde Üçüncü Basamak Bir Sağlık Merkezinin Koklear İmplant Cerrahisi Deneyimleri

Amaç: Koklear implantlar (Kİ), iki taraflı ciddi veya ileri derecede işitme kaybı olan hastalarda işitmeyi iyileştirerek dil ve konuşma gelişimine yardımcı olur. Bu çalışmada, Kİ cerrahisi geçiren hastalarımızın sonuçlarını değerlendirdik. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kİ cerrahisi uygulanmış olan 31 hastada (35 kulak); preoperatif, perioperatif ve postoperatif klinik ve odyolojik bulgular, işitme kaybı etiyolojisi, cerrahi yaklaşım teknikleri ve komplikasyonlar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Otuz bir hasta (13 yetişkin ve 18 çocuk) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Kortikal mastoidektomiyi takiben posterior timpanotomi sonrası 21 kulağa yuvarlak pencereden ve 14 kulağa kokleostomi ile elektrotlar yerleştirildi. Üç farklı firmadan farklı sayıda elektrotlu (22, 16, 12) Kİ’ler kullanıldı. Hiçbir hastada postoperatif komplikasyon görülmedi. Kontrole gelen 24 hastanın ortalama serbest alan odyogramı (FFA) ameliyat öncesi 95,2±19,13 dB, ameliyat sonrası 37,8±8,46 dB idi. Ameliyat sonrası işitme kazanımları ameliyat öncesi değerlerden anlamlı derecede farklıydı (p

Cochlear Implant Surgery Experiences of a Tertiary Health Center in the Thrace Region

Aim: Cochlear implants (CIs) aid in language and speech development through improved hearing in patients with bilateral severe or profound hearing loss. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of our patients undergoing CI surgery. Materials and Methods: Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative clinical and audiological findings, hearing loss etiology, surgical approach techniques, and complications were evaluated retrospectively in 31 patients (35 ears) undergoing CI surgery. Results: Thirty one patients (13 adults and 18 children) were included in the study. After posterior tympanotomy following cortical mastoidectomy, electrodes were introduced through the round window in 21 ears and via cochleostomy in 14 ears. CIs with different number of electrodes (22, 16, 12) from 3 different companies were used. No postoperative complications were observed in any of the patients. The mean free field audiogram (FFA) was 95.2±19.13 dB preoperatively and 37.8±8.46 dB postoperatively in 24 patients who attended the control visits. Postoperative hearing gains were significantly different from the preoperative values (p

PDF

___

1. Entwisle LK, Warren SE, Messersmith JJ. Cochlear Implantation for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss. Semin Hear. 2018;39:390-404.
2. Warner-Czyz AD, Loy B, Roland PS, Tobey EA. A comparative study of psychosocial development in children who receive cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013;14:266-75.
3. Orhan İ, Sağıroğlu S. Çocuklarda işitme kayıplarının psikososyal yönü. Erkan M, Şan F, editors. Çocuklarda İşitme Kayıpları ve Güncel Yaklaşımlar. 1. ed. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2019.p.62-4.
4. Gluth MB, Driscoll CLW, Lalwani AK. Cochlear Implants. Lalwani AK, editor. Current Diagnosis & Treatment in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 2 ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill; 2008.p.877-87.
5. Miyamoto RT, Kirk KI. Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Auditory Prostheses. Bailey BJ, Johnson JT editors. Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery. Texas: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins; 2006.p.2265-77.
6. Atay G, Sennaroğlu L. Koklear İmplantasyon. Koç C, editor. Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları ve Baş-Boyun Cerrahisi. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitapevi; 2013.p.357-68.
7. Nadol JB Jr. Cochlear Implantation and Implantable Hearing Aids. Nadol JB Jr, McKenna MJ, editors. Surgery of the Ear and Temporal Bone. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004.p.355-63.
8. Balkany TJ, Whitley M, Shapira Y, Angeli SI, Brown K, Eter E, et al. The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30:903-7.
9. Chin S, Kaiser C. Measurement of Articulation in Pediatric Users of Cochlear Implants. Volta Rev. 2000;102:145-56.
10. Geers AE, Nicholas JG, Sedey AL. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear. 2003;24(1 Suppl):46S-58S.
11. Pau HW, Just T, Bornitz M, Lasurashvilli N, Zahnert T. Noise exposure of the inner ear during drilling a cochleostomy for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:535-40.
12. Richard C, Fayad JN, Doherty J, Linthicum FH Jr. Round window versus cochleostomy technique in cochlear implantation: histologic findings. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:1181-7.
13. Jiam NT, Jiradejvong P, Pearl MS, Limb CJ. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142:873-80.
14. Havenith S, Lammers MJ, Tange RA, Trabalzini F, della Volpe A, van der Heijden GJ, et al. Hearing preservation surgery: cochleostomy or round window approach? A systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:667-74.
15. Rajput M, Nilakantan A. Functional Outcomes in Cochleostomy and Round Window Insertion Technique: Difference or No Difference? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(Suppl 2):1615-20.
16. Helms J, Moser L. Qualität des Hörens und der Kommunikation mit unterschiedlichen Cochlea-Implantaten [Hearing quality with different cochlear implants]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2010;89:660-1.
17. Jethanamest D, Channer GA, Moss WJ, Lustig LR, Telischi FF. Cochlear implant fixation using a subperiosteal tight pocket without either suture or bone-recess technique. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:1674-7.
18. Gray RF, Irving RM. Cochlear implants in chronic suppurative otitis media. Am J Otol. 1995;16:682-6.
19. Axon PR, Mawman DJ, Upile T, Ramsden RT. Cochlear implantation in the presence of chronic suppurative otitis media. J Laryngol Otol. 1997;111:228- 32.
20. Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Bacciu A, Bacciu S, Zini C. Cochlear implantation in chronic otitis media and previous middle ear surgery: 20 years of experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34:272-7.
21. Cevizci R, Bayazit YA. Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation and Treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media With or Without Cholesteatoma. KBB ve BBC Dergisi. 2016; 24:78-82.
22. Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:91-9.
23. Guneri EA, Kirkim G, Serbetcioglu BM, Erdag TK, Guneri A. Cochlear implantation in neurobrucellosis. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30:747-9.
24. Ocak E, Demirtaş M, Meco C. Nörobruselloziste Kohlear İmplantasyon ile İşitme Rehabilitasyonu. KBB ve BBC Dergisi. 2015;23:44-6.
25. Bajin MD, Savaş Ö, Aslan F, Sennaroğlu L. Cochlear Implantation in Neurobrucellosis. Balkan Med J. 2016;33:108-11.
26. Ahmadzadeh A, Daraei M, Jalessi M, Peyvandi AA, Amini E, Ranjbar LA, et al. Hearing status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131:895-9.
27. Dikici O, Muluk NB, Tosun AK, Unlüsoy I. Subjective audiological tests and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of the factors affecting hearing levels. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266:1719-26.
28. Dekker PJ, Isdale AH. Sensorineural hearing loss in juvenile chronic arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1992;31:711-3.
29. Yorgancılar E, Yıldırım M, Gün R, Bakır S, Kınış V, Özbay M, et al. Koklear implantasyon cerrahisi uygulanan 36 hastanın analizi. Dicle Med J. 2012;39:262-8.
30. Şahan M, Akın İ, Kılıçarslan S, Şimşek G, Metin E. Koklear İmplant Cerrahi Sonuçlarımız. Türk Otorinolarengoloji XXXII Ulusal Kongre Özetleri; 2010 Oct 27-31; Antalya, Türkiye; 2010.p.109.