Beyin Tümörü Olgularında İntraoperatif Ultrasonografi Kullanımının Rezeksiyon Oranına Etkisi

Amaç: İntraoperatif ultrasonografi eş zamanlı görüntü sağlayan, kolay erişilebilen, minimum riskli ve uygun maliyetli bir görüntüleme tekniğidir. Bu özelliklerine rağmen halen yaygın kullanılmamaktadır. Bu araştırmada intraoperatif ultrasonografi kullanılan olgularda, ultrasonografi tekniğinin hem preoperatif dönemde cerraha hem de postoperatif dönemde olguya faydasının olup olmayacağının araştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif araştırmaya 01 Ocak 2015 ve 31 Aralık 2020 tarihleri arasında, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversite Hastanesi’nde beyin tümörü tanısı alan olgulara (n=113) ait veriler dahil edildi. Ultrasonografi kullanılmadan opere edilen olgular (n=38) kontrol grubunu (grup 1) oluşturuyorken, ultrasonografi kullanılarak opere edilen olgular (n=75) çalışma grubunu (grup 2) oluşturdu. Randomize olarak seçilen tüm olgularda, cerrahi esnasında gözlemlenen kanama miktarları, cerrahi süreleri ile postoperatif hastanede kalış süreleri ve rezidü tümör miktarları karşılaştırıldı. Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar ortalama±standart sapma ve/veya yüzde (frekans) cinsinden sunuldu. %95 güven aralığında değerlendirilerek elde edilen verilerin gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarında, alfa anlamlılık değeri 0,05). Grup 1’e oranla grup 2’de yer alan olguların cerrahi süre ortalamasının daha az olduğu (p=0,03) ve bu sonucun istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu gözlemlendi (p

The Impacts of Intraoperative Ultrasonography Use on Revision Rate in Cases of Brain Tumor

Aim: Intraoperative ultrasonography is an accessible and cost-effective monitoring technique that provides a simultaneous view with minimum risk. Despite these advantages, it is still not in use. This study aimed to identify whether the ultrasonography technique would be advantageous for both surgeons in the preoperative period and patient in the postoperative period in cases where intraoperative ultrasonography was used. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included data of the cases (n=113) diagnosed with a brain tumor in Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Hospital between January 01, 2015 and December 31, 2020. The cases operated without using ultrasonography (n=38) formed the control group (group 1), while the cases operated by using ultrasonography (n=75) formed the study group (group 2). In all cases selected randomly, the amount of bleeding during the operation, length of the operation and postoperative stay in the hospital, and residue tumor amount werecompared. Data obtained were evaluated statistically. The results were presented in mean±standard deviation and/or percentage (frequency). The alpha significance value was accepted as 0.05) between age (p=0.61), gender (p=0.74), and size of the tumor (p=0.27). It was observed that the average length of the operations of the cases in group 2 was shorter than that of group 1 (p=0.03), and this result was statistically significant (p

PDF

___

1. Regelsberger J, Lohmann F, Helmke K, Westphal M. Ultrasound-guided surgery of deep seated brain lesions. Eur J Ultrasound. 2000;12:115-21.
2. Bal J, Camp SJ, Nandi D. The use of ultrasound in intracranial tumor surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158:1179-85.
3. LEKSELL L. Echo-encephalography. I. Detection of intracranial complications following head injury. Acta Chir Scand. 1956;110:301-15.
4. Chacko AG, Kumar NK, Chacko G, Athyal R, Rajshekhar V. Intraoperative ultrasound in determining the extent of resection of parenchymal brain tumours--a comparative study with computed tomography and histopathology. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003;145:743-8.
5. Hammoud MA, Ligon BL, elSouki R, Shi WM, Schomer DF, Sawaya R. Use of intraoperative ultrasound for localizing tumors and determining the extent of resection: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:737-41.
6. Sweeney JF, Smith H, Taplin A, Perloff E, Adamo MA. Efficacy of intraoperative ultrasonography in neurosurgical tumor resection. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;21:504-10.
7. Pino MA, Imperato A, Musca I, Maugeri R, Giammalva GR, Costantino G, et al. New Hope in Brain Glioma Surgery: The Role of Intraoperative Ultrasound. A Review. Brain Sci. 2018;8:202.
8. Gerard IJ, Kersten-Oertel M, Petrecca K, Sirhan D, Hall JA, Collins DL. Brain shift in neuronavigation of brain tumors: A review. Med Image Anal. 2017;35:403-20.
9. Mahboob S, McPhillips R, Qiu Z, Jiang Y, Meggs C, Schiavone G, et al. Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Resection of Gliomas: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2016;92:255-63.
10. Acerbi F, Broggi M, Eoli M, Anghileri E, Cavallo C, Boffano C, et al. Is fluorescein-guided technique able to help in resection of high-grade gliomas? Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36:E5.
11. Policicchio D, Doda A, Sgaramella E, Ticca S, Veneziani Santonio F, Boccaletti R. Ultrasound-guided brain surgery: echographic visibility of different pathologies and surgical applications in neurosurgical routine. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160:1175-85.
12. el Mouaaouy A, Gawlowski J, Schrot G, Arlt R. Die intraoperative Ultraschalldiagnostik in der Neurochirurgie [Intraoperative ultrasound diagnosis in neurosurgery]. Ultraschall Med. 1986;7:235-8.
13. Sastry R, Bi WL, Pieper S, Frisken S, Kapur T, Wells W, et al. Applications of Ultrasound in the Resection of Brain Tumors. J Neuroimaging. 2017;27:5- 15.
14. Hu S, Kang H, Baek Y, El Fakhri G, Kuang A, Choi HS. Real-Time Imaging of Brain Tumor for Image-Guided Surgery. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:e1800066.
15. Serra C, Stauffer A, Actor B, Burkhardt JK, Ulrich NH, Bernays RL, et al. Intraoperative high frequency ultrasound in intracerebral high-grade tumors. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:E306-12.
16. Woydt M, Krone A, Becker G, Schmidt K, Roggendorf W, Roosen K. Correlation of intra-operative ultrasound with histopathologic findings after tumour resection in supratentorial gliomas. A method to improve gross total tumour resection. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138:1391-8.
17. Gerganov VM, Samii A, Akbarian A, Stieglitz L, Samii M, Fahlbusch R. Reliability of intraoperative high-resolution 2D ultrasound as an alternative to high-field strength MR imaging for tumor resection control: a prospective comparative study. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:512-9.
18. Erdoğan N, Tucer B, Mavili E, Menkü A, Kurtsoy A. Ultrasound guidance in intracranial tumor resection: correlation with postoperative magnetic resonance findings. Acta Radiol. 2005;46:743-9.
19. Gerganov VM, Samii A, Giordano M, Samii M, Fahlbusch R. Two-dimensional high-end ultrasound imaging compared to intraoperative MRI during resection of low-grade gliomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18:669-73.
20. Wang J, Liu X, Ba YM, Yang YL, Gao GD, Wang L, et al. Effect of sonographically guided cerebral glioma surgery on survival time. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:757-62.
21. Simon RH, Ho SY, Perkins CR, D’Arrigo JS. Quantitative assessment of tumor enhancement by ultrastable lipid-coated microbubbles as a sonographic contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:29-34.
22. Karaarslan N, Yilmaz I, Sirin DY. Toxicity of the acetyl-para-aminophenol group of medicines to intact intervertebral disc tissue cells. Exp Ther Med. 2021;21:147.
23. Caliskan T, Sirin DY, Karaarslan N, Yilmaz I, Ozbek H, Akyuva Y, et al. Effects of etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein, on primary cell cultures prepared from intact human intervertebral disc tissue. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18:69-76.
24. Yilmaz I, Karaarslan N, Ozbek H. Practical Performance of Hippocampal Tissue Resection in Rats in Pharmacomolecular Research. Turk Neurosurg. 2021;31:112-8.
25. Yilmaz I, Karaarslan N, Yasar Sirin D, Ozbek H. Pharmaco-molecular assessment of the effects of anandamide and its antagonists on hippocampal tissue in Wistar albino rats. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:11871-82.