TÜRKİYE’DE KAMU YÖNETİMİ TEMEL KANUNU TASARI- SINDAN BUGÜNE MEKÂNSAL PLANLAMA MEVZUATI VE UYGULAMALARININ DÖNÜŞÜMÜ VE ETKİLERİ

Son otuz yıldır, kapitalizmin krizi ve devletin yeniden yapılandırılması tartışmaları mekânsal bir boyut kazanmaya başlamıştır. Özellikle adem-i merkezileşme, ölçek ve yönetsel düzeyler, yetkilerin devletin farklı kademeleri arasında yukarıdan aşağıya ve aşağıdan yukarıya taşınması önemli çalışma alanlarını oluşturmaktadır. Devletin merkezi ve yerel yönetimler düzeyleri arasındaki yetkiler sürekli olarak yeniden dağıtılmakta, yeni ölçekler oluşturulmakta ya da eski ölçekler önemini kaybetmektedir. Son on yıldır Türkiye'de yerel yönetimler reformu adın altında gerçekleştirilen mülki idare değişiklikleri de bu kapsamdadır. Bu değişikliklerin kent planlama sürecine yapısal etkileri olmaktadır. Bu makalede 2000'li yılların başında kısmen yasalaşan "Kamu Yönetimi Temel Kanunu Tasarısı" sonrası dönemde mekânsal planlama sistemindeki değişiklikler yeniden ölçekleme açısından eleştirel bir yaklaşımla ele alınacaktır

THE TRANSFORMATION OF SPATIAL PLANNING LEGISLATION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN TURKEY FROM THE PROPOSAL OF BASIC LAW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION TO TODAY

In the last three decades, discussions on crisis of capitalism and restructuring of state gained a spatial dimension. Decentralization, scale and administrative level, transfer of authority between different levels of government top-down and bottom-up constitutes important areas of study. Authorities have been continuously re-distributed among central and local government levels of the state, new scales are constituted or old ones became ossified. Rearrangements of territorial administration in Turkey under local government reform in the last decade can be accounted for the same scope. These changes created structural influences on urban planning. In this paper, the changes in spatial planning system in post- “Proposal of the Basic Law of Public Administration” period will be handled with regards to rescaling in a critical approach

___

  • Andersen, H. (2008). “The emerging Danish government reform - centralized decentralization”. Urban Research & Practice, 1 (1), 3-17.
  • Ansel, C. (2000) “The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe”, Governance, 13, 303-333.
  • Arboleda, M. (2016). Spaces of Extraction, Metropolitan Explosions: Planetary Urbanization and the Commodity Boom in Latin America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12290
  • Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222. Retrieved from http://metropolitanstudies.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/222/Brenner_Peck_Theodore 2010_Global_Networks_final_PDF_file.pdf
  • Büchs, M. (2009) “Examining the Interaction between Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions of State Transformation”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2, 35-39.
  • Castells, M. (2000) “Materials from an exploratory theory of the Network Society”, British Journal of Sociology, 51, 5-24.
  • Fedeli, V. (2016). Metropolitan Governance and Metropolitan Cities in Italy: Outdated Solutions For Processes of Urban Regionalisation? Raumforschung Und Raumordnung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0430-7
  • Fricke, C. (2016). Metropolitan Regions as a Changing Policy Concept in a Comparative Perspective. Raumforschung Und Raumordnung, 75, 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0450-3
  • Geppert, A. (2017). Vae Victis! Spatial Planning in the Rescaled Metropolitan Governance in France. Raumforsch Raumordn, 75, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-017-0492-1
  • Howitt, R. (1998) “Scale as Relation: Musical Metaphores of Geographical Scale”, Area, 30, 49-58.
  • Jessop, B. Brenner N. ve Jones M. (2008) “Theorizing Socio-spatial Relations”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 389-401.
  • Oliveira, C. ve Breda-Vázquez, I. (2010) “Contradictory Rescaling: Confronting State Restructuring and the Building of New Spatial Policies”, European Urban and Regional Studies, 17:4, 401-415.
  • Pierre J. ve Peters G. (2000) Governance, Politics and the State, Houndmills, UK: Macmillan.
  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996) “The New Governance: Governing without Government”, Political Studies, 44, 652-667.
  • Şahin, S.Z. (2016) 35. “Yeni Büyükşehir Kanununun Mekânsal Planlamaya Etkileri: Ankara Örneğinde Çatışma ve Çelişkiler" KAYSEM 2016 Bildiriler Kitabı. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  • Tomás, M. (2012). “Exploring the Metropolitan Trap: The Case of Montreal”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36:3, 554-567.
  • Tomàs, M., Metropolitane, S., Spanien, G. ·, Metropolitanisierung, ·, Institutionen, ·, Regierung, L., … Tomàs, M. (2017). Explaining Metropolitan Governance. The Case of Spain Metropolitan Governance erklären: Das Beispiel Spanien. Raumforschung Und Raumordnung, 75, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0445-0
  • Zimmermann, K. (2017). Re-Scaling of Metropolitan Governance in Germany ReScaling stadtregionaler Planung in Deutschland Zusammenfassung Deutschland verfügt über keine natio- nal einheitliche Politik für die Organisation stadt-regionaler Politik. Vielmehr können wir seit Jahrz. Raumforschung Und Raumordnung - Spatial Research and Planning, 75(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-017-0480-5
  • Zimmermann, K., & Getimis, P. (2017a). Metropolitan Governance in Europe.
  • Raumforschung Und Raumordnung - Spatial Research and Planning, 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-017-0491-2
  • Zimmermann, K., & Getimis, P. (2017b). Rescaling of Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning in Europe: an Introduction to the Special Issue.
  • Raumforsch Raumordn, 75(3), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-017- 0482-3