DENİZCİLERİN PSİKOSOSYAL DEĞERLENDİRMELERİNİ BELİRLEMEK İÇİN ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI

Seafarers who spend long periods at sea and therefore have little contact with life on land face various difficulties because of their strenuous working conditions. While identifying those challenges and carrying out psychosocial interventions has the potential to increase the psychosocial well-being of seafarers, there is no scale to determine the psychosocial risks that seafarers contend with in the course of their work. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying the elements of the psychosocial risks they face so such a scale can be developed. A preliminary form was prepared for that purpose. Once the validity reliability rate of the form was determined on the basis of feedback, it was submitted to 735 members of the Turkish Seafarers ' Union residing in Istanbul and the resultant data was analyzed with SPSS and AMOS. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, 3 factors named “Psychological/Spiritual Problems”, “Problems Related to Family and Environment” and “Problems Related to Work Environment” and 26 items were determined. It was determined that the total variance explained was 60.02%. In the confirmatory factor analysis performed, the structure consisting of 26 items and 3 sub-dimensions provided good fit values. As a result, it was concluded that a 3-factor Psychosocial Evaluation Scale for Seafarers consisting of 26 items is a valid and reliable scale.

A SCALE DEVELOPMENT STUDY TO DETERMINE PSYCHOSOCIAL EVALUATIONS FOR SEAFARERS

Seafarers who spend long periods at sea and therefore have little contact with life on land face various difficulties because of their strenuous working conditions. While identifying those challenges and carrying out psychosocial interventions has the potential to increase the psychosocial well-being of seafarers, there is no scale to determine the psychosocial risks that seafarers contend with in the course of their work. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying the elements of the psychosocial risks they face so such a scale can be developed. A preliminary form was prepared for that purpose. Once the validity reliability rate of the form was determined on the basis of feedback, it was submitted to 735 members of the Turkish Seafarers ' Union residing in Istanbul and the resultant data was analyzed with SPSS and AMOS. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, 3 factors named “Psychological/Spiritual Problems”, “Problems Related to Family and Environment” and “Problems Related to Work Environment” and 26 items were determined. It was determined that the total variance explained was 60.02%. In the confirmatory factor analysis performed, the structure consisting of 26 items and 3 sub-dimensions provided good fit values. As a result, it was concluded that a 3-factor Psychosocial Evaluation Scale for Seafarers consisting of 26 items is a valid and reliable scale.

___

  • Chapman, P. K. (1992). Trouble on board: The plight of international seafarers. NY: Ilr Press.
  • Carotenuto, A., Fasanaro, A. M., Molino, I., Sibilio, F., Saturnino, A., Traini, E., & Amenta, F. (2013). The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) for assessing stress of seafarers on board merchant ships. International Maritime Health, 64(4), 215-220.
  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
  • de Vet, H. C. W., Mokkink, L. B., Mosmuller, D. G., & Terwee, C. B. (2017). Spearman–Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach’s alpha: different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 85, 45–49. https:// 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.013
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage publications.
  • Doyle, N., MacLachlan, M., Fraser, A., Stilz, R., Lismont, K., Cox, H., & McVeigh, J. (2016). Resilience and well-being amongst seafarers: A cross-sectional study of crew across 51 ships. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 89(2), 199-209.
  • Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642.
  • Ercan, İ., & Kan, İ. (2004). Ölçeklerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik.
  • Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales.
  • Hafez, A. A. N. (1999). Seafarers' social life and its effect on maritime safety with respect to Egyptian seafarers. World Maritime University Dissertations. 46.
  • Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(3), 66 LP – 67. https://10.1136/eb-2015-102129
  • Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416.
  • Iversen, R. T. (2012). The mental health of seafarers. International Maritime Health, 63(2), 78-89.
  • Maskey, R., Fei, J., & Nguyen, H. O. (2018). Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(2), 91–111. https:// 10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006
  • MacLachlan, M., Kavanagh, B., & Kay, A. (2012). Maritime health: a review with suggestions for research. International Maritime Health, 63(1), 1-6.
  • McLaughlin, H. L. (2012). Seafarers and seafaring. The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics, 321-332.
  • Mitropoulos, E. E. (2011). The year of the seafarer and the impacts of piracy. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 10(1), 1-5.
  • Moss, P. A. (1994). Can There Be Validity Without Reliability? Educational Researcher, 23(2), 5–12. https://10.3102/0013189X023002005
  • Noar, S. M. (2003). The Role of Structural Equation Modeling in Scale Development. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(4), 622–647. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1004_8
  • Oldenburg, M., Hogan, B., & Jensen, H. J. (2013). Systematic review of maritime field studies about stress and strain in seafaring. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 86(1), 1-15.
  • Oldenburg, M., Baur, X., & Schlaich, C. (2010). Occupational risks and challenges of seafaring. Journal of Occupational Health, 52(5), 249–256.
  • Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. In Psychological Methods (Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 343–355). American Psychological Association. https://10.1037/1082-989X.5.3.343
  • Rengamani, J., & Murugan, M. S. (2012). A study on the factors influencing the seafarers’ stress. AMET International Journal of Management, 4(1), 44-51.
  • Sampson, H. (2013). International seafarers and transnationalism in the twenty-first century. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Shi, Q. H., & Zhang, J. (2016). On shaping the professional psychology of maritime majors. Paper presented in 2nd International Conference on Social, Education and Management Engineering (SEME 2016).
  • Shultz D. P., Shultz S. Psychology and challenges of the present-day work. PWN, Warszawa 2002.
  • Slišković, A., Penezić, Z., (2015). Occupational stressors, risks and health in the seafaring population. Review of Psychology, 22, 29–39. https://10.21465/rp0022.0004
  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Pearson Boston, MA.
  • Taşdelen, U., Aksoy, R., & Çakmak, A. F. (2016). Gemi adamlarinin iş-aile ve aile-iş çatişmasina ilişkin bir saha çalişmasi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2).
  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53.
  • Thanasegaran, G. (2009). Reliability and Validity Issues in Research. Integration & Dissemination, 4.
  • Yang, Y., & Green, S. B. (2011). Coefficient Alpha: A Reliability Coefficient for the 21st Century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 377–392. https:// 10.1177/0734282911406668
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-1658
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TÜRKİYE’NİN PROGRAM BÜTÇESİNİN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA AMAÇLARINA UYUMU

Ayşe YİĞİT ŞAKAR, Emrullah AYDIN

FİNANSAL İNOVASYON İLE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Gülay ÇİZGİCİ AKYÜZ, Seval AKBULUT BEKAR

COVID-19 PANDEMİ SÜRECİNDE UZAKTAN MUHASEBE VE FİNANS EĞİTİMİ: LİSANS ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Nurcan YAĞMURLU, İrfan SEKTİOĞLU

UYGULAMALI GİRİŞİMCİLİK EĞİTİMİNDE BAŞARILI GİRİŞİMCİLERİN KATILIMININ GİRİŞİM NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Ömer Lütfi ANTALYALI, Pınar GÖKTAŞ

KESİŞİMSELLİK YAKLAŞIMINDAN HAREKETLE KENTSEL MEKÂNA İLİŞKİN BASKI DİNAMİKLERİNİ DÜŞÜNMEK: TÜRKİYE’DE KADINLARIN KENT DENEYİMLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Funda KEMAHLI GARİPOĞLU, Duygu YILDIZ KARAKOÇ, Ayşem SEZER-ŞANLI

ÖRGÜTSEL ETİK DEĞER, KENDİNİ GELİŞTİRME, ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME VE ÇALIŞAN PERFORMANSI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Servet ALP

KADINLARIN İDEOLOJİK YÖNELİMLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ALAN ARAŞTIRMASI: ANTALYA ÖRNEĞİ

Nazlı TEKİN

TÜRKİYE’DE GENÇ KADIN VE GENÇ ERKEKLERİN İŞSİZLİK HİSTERİSİ

Yasemin TELLİ ÜÇLER, Metin YILDIRIM, Ahmet Tayfur AKCAN, Özlem KARADAĞ AK

AZERBAYCAN’DA TÜRK MİLLİYETÇİLİĞİNİN OLUŞUM SÜRECİ ÜZERİNE GENEL DEĞERLENDİRMELER

Hakan ALTINTAŞ, Hıfzı TOZ, Ali TAGHIYEV

GENEL ÖZ YETERLİLİK DÜZEYİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK EĞİLİMİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE RİSK ALMANIN RÖLÜ: ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Turhan MOÇ