___

• Ambrose, P., Barlow, J., (1986), Alternative Systems and Changing Needs: The ‘Effectiveness of European Approaches to Housing Provision, Paper presented at the International Research Conference on Housing Policy, Gävle, June 10-13.
• Balamir, M., (1985), “Konut Kesimi Araştırmalarında Bilgi Kaynakları ve DİE 1985 Konut Kira Sayımı”, DİE toplantısına sunulan yayınlanmamış rapor.
• Balchin, P.N. (Ed.), (1996), Housing Policy in Europe, Routledge, London.
• Ball, M., Harloe, H., Martens, M., (1988), Housing and Social Change in Europe and the USA, Routledge, London and New York.
• Barlow, J., Duncan, S., (1992), “Markets, States and Housing Provision: Four European Growth Regions Compared”, Progress in Planning, 38 (part 2), p. 94-177.
• Boelhouwer, P.J., van der Heijden, H.M.H., (1992), Housing Systems in Europe: Part I. A Comparative Study of Housing Policy (Housing and urban policy studies 1), Delft, University Press, Delft.
• Boelhouwer, P.J., Haffner, M.E.A., Van der Heijden, M.H.H., (2000), “Putting Comparative Housing Research into Practice”, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (15) 3-19.
• Dieleman, F.M, Clark, W.A.V., Deurloo, M.C., (1994), “Tenure choice: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses”, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 9, p. 229-46.
• Donnison, D., Ungerson, C., (1982), Housing Policy, Penguin: Harmondsworth.
• Esping-Andersen, G., (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge Polity Press.
• Goodwin, M., (2001), “Regulation as process: Regulation theory and comparative urban and regional research”, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, p. 71- 87.
• Gramsci, A., (2003), Hapishane Defterleri, Belge, İstanbul. Harloe, M., (1991), Short note: Towards a theorized comparative research: From convergence to divergence, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Researh, 8, 129-32.
• Harloe, M., (1995), The People’s Home? Social rented Housing in Europe & America, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford. Harloe, M., Maartje, M., (1984), Comparative Housing Research, Journal of Social Policy, 13: 3, 255-77.
• Hirayama, Y., Ronald, R., (2006), Housing and Social Transition in Japan, New York: Routledge.
• Kemeny, J., (1992), Housing and Social Theory, Routledge, London and New York.
• Kemeny, J., (1995), From Public Housing to the Social Market: Rental Policy Strategies in Comparative Perspective, Routledge, London.
• Kemeny, J., Lowe, S., (1998), “Schools of Comparative Housing Research: From Convergence to Divergence”, Housing Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 161-76.
• Kemeny, J., (2001), Comparative Housing and Welfare: Theorising the Relationship, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16: p. 53-70.
• Kleinman, M., (1996), Housing, Welfare and the State in Europe, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited: Cheltenham, UK. Lawson, J., (2001), Comparing the Causal Mechanisms Underlying Housing Networks Over Time and Space, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16: 29-52.
• Lux, M., (2010), Housing Policy and Housing Finance in the Czech Republic During Transition, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
• McCrone, G., Stephens, M., (1995), From Public Housing to the Social Market, Routledge, London.
• Kleinman, M., (1996), Housing, Welfare and the State in Europe, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited: Cheltenham, UK.
• McLeay, E.M., (1993), Review: [untitled] Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Winter, 1983), p. 322. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3323343 Accessed: 23/02/2011 03:3
• Oxley, M., (1991), “The Aims and Methods of Comparative Housing Research”, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 8, p. 67-77.
• Oxley, M., Smith, J., (1996), Housing Policy and Rented Housing in Europe, E & FN SPON, London.
• Oxley, M., (2001), “Meaning, Science, Context and Confusion in Comparative Housing Research”, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, p. 89-106.
• Lawson, J., (2001), “Comparing the Causal Mechanisms Underlying Housing Networks Over Time and Space”, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, p. 29-52.
• Rapoport, A., (2000), “Theory, Culture and Housing”, Housing, Theory and Society, 17, p. 145-65.
• Ronald, R., (2007), Comparing Homeowner Societies: Can we Construct an East-West model? Housing Studies, 22: 4, 473-93.
• Ronald, R., Jin, M.Y., (2010), Home Ownership in South Korea: Examining Sector Underdevelopment, Urban Studies, 47 (11) p. 2367-88.
• Sarıoğlu, G.P., (2007a), “Turkish Housing System: History and Current Debates in Comparison with Several EU Countries”, Paper Presented at ENHR Working Group Comparative Housing Policy Seminar, 20/21 Nisan, April 2007, Dublin.
• Sarıoğlu, G.P., (2007b), “Türkiye’de Konut Araştırmaları İçin Veri Kaynakları ve Geliştirme Olanakları Üzerine”, Planlama, 2007-2.
• Sarıoğlu, G.P., Balamir, M., Pellenbarg, P.H., Terpstra, P.R.A (2007), “Rented and Owner Occupied Housing: A Descriptive Study for Two Countries-Turkey and the Netherlands”, Paper presented at ENHR 2007 International Conference W 12 Housing Market dynamics, ‘Sustainable Urban Areas’, Sustainable Urban Areas ENHR Book of Abstracts, Rotterdam, (http://www.enhr2007rotterdam. nl/pages/papersdownload.htm).
• Sarıoğlu-Erdoğdu, G.P., (2010), Entry to Home Ownership: A Comparison between Turkey and the Netherlands, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Groningen, PhD. Thesis.
• Sayer, A., (1985), “The Difference that Space Makes”, Ed.: Gregory, D., Urry, J., (Eds.) Social Relations and Spatial structures, Macmillan, London, p. 49-65.
• Somerville, P., Bengtsson, B., (2002), “Constructionism, Realism and Housing Theory”, Housing, Theory and Society Special Issue: A Theory of Housing: Problems and Potential, Vol. 19: 3-4, p. 121-36.
• Strassmann, W.P., (2001), “Residential Mobility: Contrasting Approaches in Europe and the United States”, Housing Studies, 16-1, 7-21.
• Tekeli, İ., (1996), Yaşamda ve Yazında Konut Sorununun Gelişimi, HDA Housing Research Series; no: 2. Tekeli, İ., (2001), Modernite Aşılırken Kent Planlaması, İmge, Ankara.