Murat Bülent TOKDEMİR, GÜRSEL ÇETİN, Bülent ŞAM, Erdal ÖZER, Ali YILDIRIM, CELAL BÜTÜN

The Challenges in Autopsy Cases Exposed to Animal Attack

Discrimination between antemortem and postmortem lesions inflicted by animals from other traumas, and contribution of these injuries to the cause of death which is often encountered in forensic autopsies may cause some difficulties. Detailed identification, and, evaluation of bite marks which has the depth and shape of the teeth and jaw of the animal interfering to the cadaver, tissue losses, paw and tooth marks nd vital signs must be performed during autopsy. Current autopsy reports filed in the Morgue Department of Council of Forensic Medicine between the years of 1996 and 2001 had been retrospectively screened and various cases inflicted by animals during antemortem, perimortem and postmortem periods had been included in the study in order to determine emerging problems in autopsy cases with signs of animal attack and develop recommendations for points to be considered in these cases. Location of animal attack, severity of injury, typical wound characteristics, differential diagnosis among other lesions, the cause of death and effects on identification of the victim and consequences in terms of forensic medicine were evaluated based on autopsy reports of 130 cases. Postmortem (n=129 cases) and antemortem (n=1) signs of animal attack were detected. Lesions were commonly caused by marine animals, and observed on the head region. The identity of the victims, and cause of death couldn't be determined in 22, and 48 % of the cases, respectively. When we consider the problems encountered during phases of determination of the cause and type of death and identification of the signs of postmortem animal scavening, the importance of forensic medicine approach in crime scene investigation on antemortem and/or postmortem animal attacks, identifying the profile of the offending animal and the challenging autopsy procedure becomes much clearer

PDF

___

1. Sam B, Afsin H, Uysal C, Uysal C, Polat O, Günçeet E. Postmortem animal attacks; identification of animals and dead bodies. Four case reports. The 10th Biennial Scientific Meeting of International Association of Craniofacial Identification, 11-14 September 2002. Bari, Italy.

2. İşcan MY, McCabe WM. Animal effects on human remains. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, Knupper GC, eds, Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences Volume One. London: Academic Press. 2000; 198-206.

3. Sabouri Ghannad M, Roshanaei G, Rostampour F, Fallahi A. An Epidemiologic Study of Animal Bites in Ilam Province, Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2012;15(6):356-60.

4. Takayuki Kiuchi, Kotaro Matoba, Koichi Terazawa. Unusual injuries on the right hand and forearm caused by unidentified wild animals. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2008;10(6):301-5.

5. Yıldırım A, Özer E, Bütün C, Gümüş B. Ölümcül bir hayvan saldırısı: Olgu sunumu. Adli Bilimler Dergisi. 2011;10(4):35-7.

6. Mason JK, Purdue BN. The Pathology of Trauma. 3rd ed. Oxford University Pres, New York, 2000;265-82.

7. Afşin H. Adli Diş Hekimliğinde Isırık İzleri. In: Afşin H, ed, Adli Diş Hekimliği. İstanbul: Adli Tıp Kurumu Yayınları. 2004; 185-246.

8. Knight B. Post-Mortem damage by predators. In: Forensic Pathology. 2nd ed. Edward Arold, London, Melbourne, Auckland, 1998;74-6.

9. Jani CB, Gupta BD. An autopsy study on medico-legal evaluation of post-mortem scavenging. Med Sci Law. 2004;44(2):121-6.

10. Byard RW, James RA, Gilbert JD. Diagnostic problems associated with cadaveric trauma from animal activity. Am J Forensic Med Patol. 2002;23(3):238-44.

11. Hayase T, Yamamoto K, Yamamoto Y. An unusual case of extensive cadaver ingestion by a domestic dog. Arch Kriminol. 1994;194(5-6):177-81.

12. Teathter CV. Encyclopedia of Underwater Investigations. Best Publishing Company, Canada, 1998;17-68.

13. Haglund WD, Reay DT, Swindler DR. Canid scavenging/disarticulation sequence of human remains in the Pasific Northwest. J Forensic Sci. 1989;34(3):587-606.

14. Willey P, Snyder LM. Canid modification of human remains: implications for time - since-death estimations. JFSCA. 1989;34(3):894-901.

15. Komar DA. Decay rates in a cold climate region: a review of cases involving advanced decomposition from the Medical Examiner's Office in Edmonton, Alberta. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43(1):57-61.

16. Tsokos M, Koops E, Puschel K. Postmortem dog bites after sexually motivated homicide with multiple stab wounds--differential diagnostic aspects. Arch Kriminol. 2000;206(1-2):30-7.

17. Tsokos M, Schulz F. Indoor postmortem animal interference by carnivores and rodents: report of two cases and review of literature. Int J Legal Med. 1999;112:115-9.

18. Ropohl D, Scheithauer R, Pollak S. Postmortem injuries inflicted by domestic golden hamster: morphological aspects and evidence by DNA typing. Forensic Sci Int. 1995;72(2):81-90.

19. Tsokos M, Matschke J, Gehl A, Koops E, Püschel K. Skin and soft tissue artifacts due to postmortem damage cause by rodents. Forensic Sci Int. 1999;104(1):47-57.

20. Haglund WD. Contribution of rodents to postmortem artifacts of bone and soft tissue. J Forensic Sci. 1992;37(6):1459-65.

21. Rothschild MA, Schneider V. On the temporal onset of postmortem animal scavenging “motivation” of the animal. Forensic Sci Int. 1997;89(1-2):57-64.

22. Patel F. Artefact in forensic medicine: postmortem rodent activity. J Forensic Sci. 1994;39(1):257-60.

23. Vogel JS, Parker JR, Jordan FB, Coury TL, Vernino AR. Persian leopard (panthera pardus) attack in Oklahoma, Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2000;21(3):264-9.

24. Rollins CE, Spencer DE. A Fatality and the American mountain lion: bite mark analysis and profile of the offending lion. J Forensic Sci. 1995;40(3):486-9.

25. American Board of Forensic Odontology. Gudelines for bite mark analyses. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986;112(3):383-6.

26. Denic N, Huyer DW, Sinal SH, Lantz PE, Smith CR, Silver MM. Cockroach: the omnivorous scavenger. Potential misinterpretation of postmortem injuries. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1997;18(2):177-80.

27. De Munnynck K, Van de Voorde W. Forensic approach of fatal dog attacks: a case report and literature review. Int J Legal Med. 2002;116(5):295-300.

28. Brauner P, Reshef A, Gorski A, DNA profiling of trace evidence in a dog biting case. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(5):1232-4.