Real-life risk factors of inadequate procedure prior to colonoscopy in a Turkish population

Real-life risk factors of inadequate procedure prior to colonoscopy in a Turkish population

Colonoscopy is one of the main diagnostic tools for symptoms related to the colon and colorectal cancer screening programs. Inadequate cleansing of colonoscopy leads to misdiagnosis of adenomas. It is recommended to re-evaluate ineffective colonoscopy. It is of utmost importance to predict whether the bowel is clean or not because the procedure is expensive, invasive and time- consuming. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of inadequate bowel preparation. The consecutive two hundred and fifty-three patients who were referred for colonoscopy were enrolled into the study. The demographic and clinical data were obtained using a questionnaire. Only 79.1% of colonoscopy were assessed as adequate. In the univariate analysis; adherence to protocol, older age, consuming high-fiber diet in last two days, number of days of low residue diet, consumed all laxative, consumed 1.5 L water after laxative usage, regular diet for dinner before the day of colonoscopy, amount of water consumed before the day of colonoscopy, amount of water consumed in the morning of the day of colonoscopy, fasting status in the morning of the CD, and were found significantly relevant for adequate bowel preparation. Older age, number of days of low residue diet, consuming high-fiber diet in last two days, regular diet for the dinner before the day of colonoscopy, not Consumed all laxatives were independent risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy. These factors are reversible risk factors except older age. Increasing the adherence to the protocol with education seems to improve the bowel preparation quality.

___

  • 1. Millien VO, Mansour NM. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020;22:28. 2. Dong SH, Huang JQ, Chen JS. Interval colorectal cancer: a challenging field in colorectal cancer. Future Onco. 2018;14:1307-16.
  • 3. Teixeira C, Martins C, Dantas E, et al. Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico. 2019;84:284-9.
  • 4. Mahmood S, Farooqui SM, Madhoun MF. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;30:819-26.
  • 5. Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Baute JL, Hernandez G, et al. Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score. Endoscopy. 2017;49:536-43.
  • 6. Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, et al. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:501-6.
  • 7. Chan WK, Saravanan A, Manikam J, et al. Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:86.
  • 8. Yenidogan E, Okan I, Kayaoglu HA, et al. Same-day colonoscopy preparation with Senna alkaloids and bisacodyl tablets: a pilot study. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15382-6.
  • 9. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620-5.
  • 10. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1296-308.
  • 11. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, et al. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparationquality rating. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:463-70.
  • 12. Dik VK, Moons LM, Huyuk M, et al. Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:665-72.
  • 13. Abou Fadel CG, Shayto RH, Sharara AI. Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2016;14:115-27.
  • 14. Bechtold ML, Mir F, Puli SR, Nguyen DL. Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a guide to enhance quality of visualization. Ann Gastroenterol 2016;29:137-46.
  • 15. Yee R, Manoharan S, Hall C, et al. Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: what are the predictors of an inadequate preparation? Am J Surg. 2015;209:787-92; discussion 92.
  • 16. Cheng RW, Chiu YC, Wu KL, et al. Predictive factors for inadequate colon preparation before colonoscopy. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19:111-5.
  • 17. Yadlapati R, Johnston ER, Gregory DL, et al. Predictors of Inadequate Inpatient Colonoscopy Preparation and Its Association with Hospital Length of Stay and Costs. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:3482-90.
  • 18. Yoo IK, Lee JS, Chun HJ, et al. A randomized, prospective trial on efficacy and tolerability of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47:131-7.
  • 19. Nguyen DL, Wieland M. Risk factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: the importance of health literacy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2010;19:369-72.
  • 20. Avalos DJ, Sussman DA, Lara LF, et al. Effect of Diet Liberalization on Bowel Preparation. South Med J. 2017;110:399-407.
  • 21. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1797-802.
  • 22. Sharara AI, Harb AH, Sarkis FS, et al. Body mass index and quality of bowel preparation: Real life vs. clinical trials. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2016;17:11-6.
  • 23. Govani SM, Elliott EE, Menees SB, et al. Predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation in asymptomatic patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;8:616-22.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

AVIPTADIL; Class effect of a Synthetic VIP as a treatment option in COVID 19 patients with severe respiratory failure

Dwaipayan Sarathi CHAKRABORTY, Shouvik CHOUDHURY, Sandeep LAHİRY

Evaluation of the neurosurgical events with detailed demographic factors in pediatric traumas

Ayse ERTEKİN, Usame RAKİP

Comparison of the long-term effects of high and low altitude on the choroidal thickness

Mehmet Giray ERSÖZ, İbrahim ÖZDEMİR, Sucattin İlker KOCAMIŞ

The costs of asthma disease on the healthcare system

Kerim YEŞİLDAĞ

Investigation of gut microbiota in suicide cases instead of forensic sciences

Hüseyin ÇAKAN, Alper EVRENSEL, Murat OGDUR

Incidence of symptomatic adjacent vertebral fractures after percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Adnan Yalçın DEMİRCİ, Kazım YİĞİTKANLI, Fatih AYDEMİR

Evaluation of the effect of obesity on fibromyalgia in premenopausal female patients

Müjgan GÜRLER, Dicle AYDOĞDU OĞUZ

Diagnostic performance of hematological indices in early and late preeclampsia

Dicle İSKENDER, Mehmet OBUT, Ayşe KELEŞ, Ozgur ARAT, Özge YÜCEL ÇELİK, Dilara SARIKAYA, Mehmet KAYA, Mehmet Sinan DAL, Cantekin İSKENDER

A Parameter and complication to be followed in COVID-19 patients: creatine kinase and rhabdomyolysis

Nevsun PİHTİLİ TAS, SELDA TELO

The impact of COVID-19-related social restriction and containment measures on admissions for orthopedic surgery in a private hospital: cross-sectional data from a secondary healthcare provider in Turkey

Bertan CENGİZ