Mehmet Husamettin AKKUCUK, MELTEM AKKAŞ, Nalan Metin AKSU, Evvah KARAKILIÇ, Hayri RAMADAN, Murat Dogan ISCANLİ, Yesim Cetinkaya SARDAN

Novel Triage for Crowded Emergency Clinics: Patient Triage

More effective and accurate methods of triage are needed for overcrowded emergency clinics. In this study, the starting point was taken as 'the patient is the primary and most important factor in determining emergency condition', and thus, the triage was conducted by the patient him/herself.The study involved 308 patients over the age of 16 who were admitted to the Adult Emergency Clinic of Emergency Medicine Department, Hacettepe University Medical School, between May 1st and 9th, 2010. The mean age of the patients was 46 years (SD ± 20.894). Of the patients, 47.9% (n=147) were male, 52.1% (n=160) were female. Considering the complaints of the patients at presentation, and compatibility of diagnosis at triage, Kappa statistics were used and the compatibility rates were as follows: 49.8% in the patients, 41.8% in the paramedics, 63.8% in the nurses, 6.2 % in the intern doctors, 62.6% in the junior residents, 65% in the senior residents, and 66.5% in the specialists. The accuracy rates of prediagnosis based on the patient complaints were 53.1% (n=163) for the patients, 67.1% (n=206) for the paramedics, 71.2% for the nurses, 64.5% (n=198) for the intern doctors, 73% (n=224) for the junior residents, 80.8% (n=248) for the senior residents, and 82.4% (n=253) for the specialists. The overtriage and undertriage rates of the patients were 25.1% and15.5% respectively, which are compatible with the recommendations by American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT). The patients were found successful in establishing the correct triage and diagnosis for themselves. Thus, in cases where the patient him/herself cannot cooperate, experimentation with triage scales developed to involve active participation of patients' relatives may be helpful. In addition, active participation will significantly reduce the rates of complaints for waiting times and related arguments among patients.

PDF

___

1. The Lewin Group Emergency department overload: a growing crisis -- the results of the American Hospital Association Survey of Emergency Department and Hospital Capacity: Falls Church, VA: American Hospital Association: 2002.

2. American College of Emergency Physicians. Crowding, Boarding Problems Fleshed Out at ACEP Summit. EM Today. August 22, 2005. http://www.acep.org/publications.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&id=27362&fid=1786&Mo= No access date 27.01.2010

3. FitzGerald G, Jelinek GA, Scott D, Gerdtz MF. Emergency department triage revisited. Emerg Med J. 2010;27(2):86-92.

4. Moll HA. Challenges in the validation of triage systems at emergency departments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;3(4):384-8.

5. Dunn JD, Mayer TA. Future legal issues in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1993;11(4):933-51.

6. Tandberg D, Qualls C. Time series forecasts of emergency department patient volume, length of stay, and acuity. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23(2):299-306.

7. Li J, Galvin HK, Johnson SC. The "prudent layperson" definition of an emergency medical condition. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20(1):10-3.

8. Huang CJ, Poirier MP, Cantwell JR, Ermis PR, Isaacman DJ. Prudent layperson definition of an emergent pediatric medical condition. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006; 45(2):149-55.

9. Moll van Charante EP, ter Riet G, Bindels P. Self-referrals to the A&E department during out-of-hours: patients' motives and characteristics. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(2):256-65.

10. ACEP Reimbursem ent Committee: Fighting managed care denials in the emergency department. American College of Emergency Physicians, Dallas, TX, 1999;1-27.

11. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, 1999;98.

12. Bruijns SR, Wallis LA, Burch VC. A prospective evaluation of the Cape triage score in the emergency department of an urban public hospital in South Africa. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(7):398-402.

13. Platts-Mills TF, Travers D, Biese K, McCall B, Kizer S, LaMantia M, BusbyWhitehead J, Cairns CB. Accuracy of the Emergency Severity Index triage instrument for identifying elder emergency department patients receiving an immediate lifesaving intervention. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(3):238-43.

14. Giannakopoulos GF, Lubbers WD, Christiaans HM, van Exter P, Bet P, Hugen PJ, Innemee G, Schubert E, de Lange-Klerk ES, Goslings JC, Jukema GN. Cancellations of (helicopter-transported) mobile medical team dispatches in the Netherlands. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395(6):737-45.

15. Curtis K, Olivier J, Mitchell R, Cook A, Rankin T, Rana A, Watson WL, Nau T. Evaluation of a tiered trauma call system in a level 1 trauma centre. Injury. 2011;42(1):57-62.

16. Bergeron S, Gouin S, Bailey B, Amre DK, Patel H. Agreement among pediatric health care professionals with the pediatric Canadian triage and acuity scale guidelines. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004;20(8):514-8.

17. Pitts SR, Niska RW, Xu J, Burt CW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;6(7):1- 38.

18. Tokars JI1, English R, McMurray P, Rhodes B. Summary of data reported to CDC's national automated biosurveillance system, 2008. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:30.