Emine KADIOĞLU, Serhat KARAMAN, Ahmet CEYLAN, Mustafa ÇALIK, Ahmet Burak ERDEM, Ozlem ARIK, Abdurrahman YILMAZ, Hasan AYDIN, Abdil COŞKUN, Esref GENÇ, Zeynep Yildiz AKBEY, Harun YILDIRIM, Murtaza KAYA

Covid-19 related anxiety levels of emergency service personnel: A cross-sectional study from Turkey

COVID-19 pandemic significantly affects the mental health of the personnel working in the frontline of the healthcare system. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of anxiety and risk factors in people who served in the emergency health system during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was designed as a cross-sectional online survey conducted on healthcare staff working in emergency services throughout the country between May 15 and June 15, 2020. The questionnaire form consisted of two parts. The first part included sociodemographic questions (13 questions), while the second part consisted of 20 questions found in STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) anxiety. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the potential risk factors for anxiety symptoms in the participants. Relationships between risk factors and their consequences were stated as rates (ORs) and 95% CI. A total 1014 completed the survey. Among the respondents, 54.3% male, 41.3% 18–29 age group, 60.4% married, 44.9% doctors, and 63.4% working in the city center. Analysis showed that anxiety triggering factors included being a female (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13–1.99; p = 0.004), working as an emergency medical technician (OR, 7.42; 95% CI, 1.09–50.53; p = 0.041), large family (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.06–2.70; p = 0.041), few children (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.84–2.15; p = 0.068), and working in the town center (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.06–1.93; p = 0.017). Our results showed that the anxiety level is high for a significant portion of the emergency staff during the pandemic and that risk-enhancing factors exist in their home and work lives during this period. It is important to carry out supportive administrative studies aimed at reducing stress and anxiety levels, especially for the health staff working in the frontline during the pandemic.

PDF

___

1. Jianbo Lai , Simeng Ma , Ying Wang , et al. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:1-12
2. Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, et al. Transmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:970-1.
3. https://www.who.int/news/item/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-secondmeeting- of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergencycommittee- regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019 ncov) accessed date 15.10.2020
4. Republıc Of Turkey Mınıstry Covıd-19 Informatıon Page. https://covid19. saglik.gov.tr/?_Dil=2. accessed date 15.10.2020
5. Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, et al. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ.2003;168:1245-51.
6. Bai Y, Lin CC, Lin CY, et al. Survey of stress reactions among health care workers involved with the SARS outbreak. Psychiatry Serv. 2004;55:1055- 7.
7. Lee AM, Wong JG, McAlonan GM, et al. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52:233-240.
8. https://covid19bilgi.saglik.gov.tr/tr/destek-hat-bilgileri. accessed date 15.10.2020
9. Department of Health and Human Services. Exposure to stress. In: Occupational hazards in hospitals. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 2008. https://www.cdc. gov/niosh/docs/2008-136/pdfs/2008-136.pdf. (Accessed 15.10.2020)
10. Arnetz BB. Psychosocial challenges facing physicians of today. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:203-13
11. Xiao Y, Wang J, Chen S, et al. Psychological distress, burnout level and job satisfaction in emergency medicine: A cross-sectional study of physicians in China. Emerg Med Australas 2014;26:538-42.
12. Dias RD, Scalabrini Neto A. Acute stress in residents during emergency care: a study of personal and situational factors. Stress. 2017; 20:241-8.
13. Bandelow B, Michaelis S. Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17:327-35.
14. Khuwaja AK, Qureshi R, Azam SI. Prevalence and factors associated with anxiety and depression among family practitioners in Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2004;54:45-9.
15. Lee AM, Wong JG, McAlonan GM, et al. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52:233-40.
16. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Test manual for the State Trait Anxiety Inventory. 1st ed.California: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.
17. Karadagli S. Evaluation of the Preoperative Anxiety With Apais and STAI-I Scales. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing. 2017;4:38-47.
18. Van Bavel JJ, Boggio P, Capraro V, et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour. 2020;4:460–71.
19. Ruggiero JS. Health, work variables, and job satisfaction among nurses. J Nurs Adm. 2005;35:254-63.
20. Barrau-Baumstarck K, Rebeschini E, Dalivoust G, et al. Shiftwork and quality of life among critical care nurses and paramedical personnel. Presse Med. 2009;38:346-53.
21. Karagozoglu S, Bingol N. Sleep quality and job satisfaction of Turkish nurses. Nurs Outlook. 2008;56:298-307.
22. Greenberg MR, Schneider DF. Gender differences in risk perception: effects differ in stressed vs. non- stressed envi-ronments. Risk Analysis. 1995; 15:503-11.
23. Chang C, Tang CS. The psychology behind the masks: Psychological responses to the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak in different regions. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2004;7:3-7.
24. Holmes BJ. Communicating about emerging infectious disease: the importance of research. Health Risk and Society. 2008;10:349-60.