This study was carried out to analyze the trends by years in the distribution of subjects in anatomy questions asked in Medical Specialization Exams (TUS) in year 2000 and beyond. Anatomy questions asked in TUS in year 2000 and beyond were examined under basic anatomy and clinical anatomy headings based on the curriculum in medical faculties. A total of 506 anatomy questions, 10 each year until 2012 and 14 each year starting from 2012 spring, were evaluated. The questions were grouped in two as years 2000-2011 and 2012-2021. Of the 506 questions examined, 382 (75.49%) evaluated basic anatomy knowledge, while 121 (23.91%) evaluated clinical anatomy knowledge. It was found that 3 (0.59%) were cancelled by Student Selection And Placement Center (it is called OSYM in Turkey). It was found that 21 (4.22%) of the questions included figures or pictures. All of the questions were examined in terms of systems. Statistically significant increase was found in the number of questions on locomotor system anatomy, circulatory system anatomy, digestive system anatomy and urogenital system anatomy in 2012 and after (p
___
1. Gülekon İ. The role of radiological and clinical anatomy in anatomy education: interview with students. GMJ. 2017;28:179-183.
2. Arifoğlu Y. Her Yönüyle Anatomi. Revised 1st edition, İstanbul Medicine publisher, İstanbul, 2017;15.
3. Ekmekci PE, Berna A. An example of anatomy education materials from 1931: excellent human body map. Lokman Hekim Journal. 2015;5:52-61.
4. Tubbs RS. Anatomy, the eye of medicine. Clinical Anatomy. 2021;3:821.
5. Carmichael SW, Pawlina W. Animated powerpoint as a tool to teach anatomy. Anat Rec. 2000;261:83-8.
6. Özveren CP. The final year medical students who are preparing for the medical proficiency examination and the factors that affect the opinions or choices of new graduated doctors about the emergency medicine department. Specialization Thesis in Medicine, Trakya.
7. Özmen P, Şahin S, Çetin M, et al. Perceptions of education and future considerations of year 2012 graduates of gülhane military medical faculty. Gulhane Med J. 2013;55:261-8.
8. Atılgan B, Temizayak F, Çağıran T, et al. The views of senior medical students' about the medical skills traning at the hacettepe university faculty of medicine. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 2020;19:5-25.
9. Sayek İ, Odabaşı O. Turkish medical association pregraduate medical edication report 2010. 1st edition. Turkish Medical Association Publications, Ankara, 2010.
10. Kandemir YB, Sindel M, Şenol Y. Anatomy course requirement during training in different specialities in medi̇ci̇ne. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2018;17:50-5.
11. All TUS Questions Anatomy, Clinician Medicine Publisher, 30th edition, 2020.
12. March 2021 OSYM's Original TUS Questions and detailed explanations 2021. Clinician Medicine Publisher. 2021.
13. ÖSYM Çıkmış TUS Soruları 2021. Available from: https://www.osym.gov. tr/TR,15072/tus-cikmis-sorular.html. acces date 01.07.2021
14. Yılmaz S, Susar H, Karaca İ, et al. Viewpoints of research assistants on anatomy training. Bozok Med J. 2017;7:35-40.
15. Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, et al. American medical education 100 years after the flexner report. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1339-44.
16. Şenol D, Toy Ş, Canbolat M, et al. Evaluation of online anatomy education given in medicine and dentistry faculties of universities during covid-19 pandemic with student feedback. Konuralp Medical Journal. 2021;13:30-5.
17. Canbolat M. Evaluation of the knowledge levels of the physician candidates about oral dental health and some anatomical structures in the oral area. Med Records. 2021;3:87-93.
18. Uygur R, Çağlar V, Topçu B, et al. The Assessment of the Students’ Opinions about Anatomy Education. Int J Basic Clin Med. 2013;1:94-106.
19. Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89;104–7.
20. Arı İ, İrgil E, Kafa İM, et al. A questionnaire study: anatomy education and student’s views. Journal of Uludağ University Medical Faculty. 2003;29:15- 8.